On a Thursday morning in late January, oil markets rose for a third straight day, carrying Brent crude to $68.90 a barrel and WTI to $63.79, their highest levels since late September. The reason lies less in the barrels themselves than in the shadow of a possible American strike on Iran, a country that pumps roughly 3.2 million barrels a day and whose trouble has always reached the world through the price of fuel. Traders are pricing in a future that has not yet arrived, and in doing so they reveal how quickly a threat of war can become a line item on a commodity chart.
Oil Climbs for a Third Day as Iran Strike Fears Lift Brent to Highest Since September
The potential for Iran getting hit has escalated the geopolitical premium
Mark
Three days of gains, about 5% in total. Is this really just about Iran?
Mimi
Mostly, but not only. Iran's threat is the headline, with a U.S. naval group arriving and Trump threatening strikes. But U.S. crude stocks also fell 2.3 million barrels when analysts expected a 1.8 million rise.
Mark
How much of the price is fear, then?
Mimi
Citi estimates the Iran risk adds $3 to $4 a barrel. Brent is at $68.90, so that's a meaningful slice.
Luke
Worth saying that's Citi's estimate, not a measured figure. Nobody can observe a premium directly; it's inferred.
Mark
And the $72 number?
Luke
Same caveat. It's Citi's scenario for further escalation, not a forecast anyone has confirmed.
Mimi
Iran produces 3.2 million barrels a day and is the fourth-largest OPEC producer. That's why traders pay attention even before anything happens.
Mark
The report on toppling the regime sounds significant.
Luke
It is attributed to unnamed U.S. sources, and the reporting says Trump is considering options. That isn't a decision. We don't know whether any strike will happen.
Mimi
Right, and Citi also points to Russian oil restrictions and Chinese buying, so the support for prices isn't only Iran.
Luke
And the year began with an expected large oversupply. Whether these factors outweigh that isn't settled by one week of data.
Le Pouls
- Oil climbed for a third day as traders priced in the chance of a US military strike on Iran, with Brent up about 5% since January 26.
- Reports that Washington is weighing strikes on Iranian security forces and leaders have injected fresh fear into an already jittery market.
- A surprise drop of 2.3 million barrels in US crude inventories tightened supply, adding real physical pressure beneath the political one.
- Citi estimates the Iran threat alone adds $3 to $4 a barrel and could push Brent toward $72 if tensions escalate.
- Prices are poised to stay elevated, with the next move hinging on whether pressure on Tehran turns into action.
On a Thursday morning in late January, oil markets rose for a third straight day, carrying Brent crude to $68.90 a barrel and WTI to $63.79, their highest levels since late September. The reason lies less in the barrels themselves than in the shadow of a possible American strike on Iran, a country that pumps roughly 3.2 million barrels a day and whose trouble has always reached the world through the price of fuel. Traders are pricing in a future that has not yet arrived, and in doing so they reveal how quickly a threat of war can become a line item on a commodity chart.
By the early hours of Thursday, January 29, Brent crude had reached $68.90 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate $63.79, marking a third consecutive daily gain and the highest prices since late September. Both benchmarks had climbed about five percent in just three sessions, and the market was no longer quietly drifting but reacting to a specific fear.
That fear is a possible American military attack on Iran. President Trump has increased pressure on Tehran to abandon its nuclear programme, backing his demands with threats of strikes, and a US naval group has moved into the region. Iran, the fourth-largest producer in OPEC, pumps about 3.2 million barrels a day, so any conflict that touched its output or exports would reach far beyond its borders. Reuters reported that Washington was weighing strikes against Iranian security forces and leaders, in the hope of sparking protests that might topple the government.
Adding to the pressure was an unexpected drawdown in American crude stocks, which fell 2.3 million barrels when analysts had expected a rise. Citi estimated that the Iran threat alone added $3 to $4 a barrel in geopolitical premium and could lift Brent to $72 if escalation followed. Its broader view is that prices will stay firm, given US restrictions on Russian oil and steady Chinese buying, a sharp change from the oversupply many had expected at the year's start.
For now the market waits on a single question: will pressure become action? Until that answer comes, oil rests on three supports, the military buildup, the shrinking inventories, and persistent demand from China.
By 0216 GMT on Thursday, January 29, Brent crude futures stood at $68.90 a barrel, up 50 cents, or 0.73%. U.S. West Texas Intermediate had gained 58 cents, or 0.92%, to $63.79. It was the third straight daily rise for oil, and both benchmarks have now climbed about 5% since January 26, reaching their highest levels since September 29.
The driver is the possibility of a U.S. military attack on Iran. President Donald Trump has stepped up pressure on Tehran to end its nuclear programme, backing it with threats of military strikes, and a U.S. naval group has arrived in the region. Iran is the fourth-largest producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, pumping 3.2 million barrels per day, so any conflict that disrupted its output or exports would matter to supply.
Reuters reported on Thursday, citing U.S. sources familiar with the discussions, that Trump is weighing options to strike Iranian security forces and leaders. The aim under consideration would be to inspire protests that could potentially topple the current regime. The report adds a more specific scenario to the broader threats already in circulation.
Analysts at Citi put a number on the effect. In a note on Wednesday they said the potential for Iran being hit has raised the geopolitical premium in oil prices by potentially $3 to $4 a barrel. They added that further escalation could push Brent as high as $72.
The geopolitical story was not the only support. The U.S. Energy Information Administration reported on Wednesday that American crude inventories fell by 2.3 million barrels to 423.8 million barrels in the week ended January 23. Analysts polled by Reuters had expected a 1.8 million-barrel increase, so the draw was a surprise in the opposite direction. The United States is the world's largest oil consumer.
Linh Tran, a market analyst at XS.com, read the data as a sign of tightening. In her view, the short-term supply-demand balance has tightened, reflecting steady refinery demand and constrained barrels available to the market.
Citi's wider assessment is that prices may remain elevated. It points to rising geopolitical risks, U.S. restrictions on Russian oil purchases, and continued buying by China. That outlook stands against the expectation many in the market held at the start of the year, when a large oversupply was widely anticipated.
What to watch now is whether the U.S. moves from pressure to action against Iran. Short of that, the price has a few supports: the military buildup, the inventory draw, and steady Chinese demand.
Citations marquantes
The potential for Iran getting hit has escalated the geopolitical premium of oil prices by potentially $3 to $4 per barrel.— Citi analysts
The short-term supply-demand balance has tightened, reflecting steady refinery demand and constrained barrels available to the market.— Linh Tran, market analyst, XS.com
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur MarketScreener ↗
Politics & Governance