Ofiniti Eyes 20% of Global Bunker Market as Digital Platform Scales Rapidly

Transparency pays, and the data proves it.
Carlsen argues that shipowners who embrace operational visibility can reduce fuel costs and avoid costly delays.
Mark

So Ofiniti is projecting 20% of global bunker fuel by 2027. That's a staggering claim. What makes them confident they can actually get there?

Mimi

They've already completed 24,700 operations in 2026 alone, which beat their entire 2025 total with months to spare. They've moved over half a million metric tons of alternative fuels. The growth trajectory is real.

Luke

But growth in one port—Singapore—where there's a mandate, is different from organic adoption elsewhere. How much of that 20% projection depends on new mandates versus voluntary adoption?

Mimi

That's the bet Carlsen is making. He's arguing that once operators see the operational benefits—on-time barges, verified deliveries, fuel reconciliation—they'll want it even without a mandate.

Mark

What are those benefits exactly? Why would a shipowner care enough to demand this from their suppliers?

Mimi

Faster port turnarounds mean more time at sea, which means slower steaming and lower fuel costs. Late barges delay departures with huge financial consequences. Mismatches between stated and actual fuel delivered have caused engine failures. The platform lets you verify what actually happened.

Luke

Those are real problems, but they're not new. Why hasn't the industry solved them before? And is Carlsen's experience at DFDS—a European ro-ro operator—actually representative of the global shipowner base?

Mimi

Fair point. DFDS operates in Northern Europe with predictable supply chains. The shadow fleet, which Carlsen himself acknowledged, operates in a completely different world. Transparency is not a universal value.

Mark

So who actually adopts this voluntarily, and who doesn't?

Mimi

Legitimate operators who want to demonstrate compliance and distance themselves from sanctions evasion and illicit activity. The good actors, as Carlsen puts it. But that's a subset of the market.

Luke

And the geographic expansion—South China Sea, Hong Kong, Thailand—those are regions where regulatory frameworks are less settled than Singapore. How does Ofiniti scale without mandates?

Mimi

They're betting on the operational case alone. And they're talking to the global top ten suppliers, which would be a different lever than port-by-port adoption.

Mark

What about the alternative fuels angle? Half the orderbook is LNG-fuelled. Does that drive adoption?

Mimi

It did in Singapore, but Carlsen suggested the fuel mix might not matter long-term. Once operators see the system's advantages with LNG, why would they accept an old-fashioned system for conventional fuels?

Luke

That's a nice theory, but it assumes operators will voluntarily pay for transparency across all fuel types. The bunker industry has resisted transparency for decades. What's changed?

Mimi

Regulation, partly. But also competitive pressure and the reputational cost of being associated with shadow fleets. The industry's reputation is toxic enough that legitimate players see transparency as a differentiator.

Mark

So the real question is whether 20% is achievable without mandates, or whether Ofiniti's growth depends on regulatory momentum they can't control.

Luke

Exactly. And the source material doesn't really tell us how much of their current 24,700 operations come from mandate-driven Singapore versus voluntary adoption elsewhere.

  • 24,700 bunker operations completed by August 2026, exceeding full-year 2025 total of 24,000
  • Ofiniti projects handling close to 20% of global marine fuel delivered in 2027
  • Singapore's bunkering market recorded 56.2 million metric tons in 2025, roughly 20% of global demand
  • Company raised $9 million total funding; acquired Teqplay in May 2026
  • Expansion underway from Singapore into South China Sea, with global top-10 suppliers in active talks

Ofiniti has completed 24,700 bunker operations in 2026 alone, surpassing its entire 2025 total of 24,000 with four months remaining in the year. The platform focuses on operational coordination, scheduling, and documentation rather than procurement, differentiating itself from failed digital bunkering platforms of the past two decades.

Marine fuel digitalization firm Ofiniti projects handling nearly 20% of global bunker fuel by 2027, having already exceeded 2025's annual operations by August 2026 with 24,700 completed transactions.

Ofiniti, a digital platform for coordinating marine fuel operations, is on track to handle nearly one-fifth of the world's bunker fuel by next year. The company has already completed 24,700 bunkering operations in 2026 alone—surpassing the entire 24,000 it processed throughout 2025, with four months still remaining. Over the past eighteen months, more than 13,000 unique vessels have used the platform. By August, Ofiniti had moved more than half a million metric tons of alternative fuels, a volume it had already exceeded by the time the year's eighth month closed.

These numbers matter partly because the digital bunkering sector has been a graveyard of failed platforms since the early 2000s. What sets Ofiniti apart is deliberate restraint about what it does and does not do. The company explicitly avoids procurement—the buying side of the fuel chain—and steers clear of voyage optimization and routing systems. Instead, it focuses on the operational layer: scheduling, coordination, digital delivery, documentation, and the shared visibility that allows all parties in a bunker transaction to see the same picture. This narrow focus proved crucial. Torben Carlsen, the company's newly appointed chair and former chief executive of shipping company DFDS, was initially skeptical that suppliers would embrace a shared, transparent platform. He was wrong. Barge operators became early adopters, and shipowners began demanding access to the data their suppliers could now provide through Ofiniti.

The platform took root in Singapore, the world's largest bunkering port, which recorded 56.2 million metric tons in bunker sales in 2025 against global demand of roughly 275 million metric tons. Singapore's electronic bunker delivery note mandate—requiring suppliers to issue digital documentation—opened the door. Alternative fuels, particularly liquefied natural gas, drove early adoption because of their regulatory complexity and administrative weight. Carlsen noted that many shipowners now benefit from the platform without realizing it, while others who have seen the operational data are now requesting it from their suppliers as a condition of doing business.

The company has raised $9 million in total funding, including $6.8 million in March 2026. In May, it acquired Teqplay, a firm specializing in digital twins of vessel and cargo movements, expanding Ofiniti's ability to connect ship movements, port activity, and bunkering operations into a unified operational picture. Carlsen joined in August to drive growth on the buyer side of the market—the shipowners and operators who consume the fuel.

From his years running DFDS, Carlsen understands what transparency delivers. At DFDS, an internal program called "every minute counts" recognized that faster port turnarounds let ships slow down at sea and burn less fuel. Knowing exactly when barges arrive, when they depart, and when the last cargo reaches the vessel matters enormously. Late barges delay departures with cascading financial and operational consequences. Mismatches between stated deliveries and actual fuel received have caused engine failures. The platform's data allows owners to verify delivery metrics after the fact—comparing what a barge was present for against what was invoiced—and to trace fuel problems back to their source. These are problems Carlsen can speak to from direct experience, and they form the core of his pitch to other shipowners.

Geographic expansion is now underway. Ofiniti has already moved into the ARA hub, West Africa, and Scandinavia. From Singapore, it is working outward into the South China Sea, with Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Thailand as near-term targets and China under exploration. Two of Hong Kong's top five suppliers are running trials. The company is also rolling out across the United States and Panama with an existing customer, and the Teqplay acquisition brought it the first and third largest U.S. ports by gross tonnage through Greater Houston. Raguse said much of the growth potential lies with the global top ten suppliers, and Ofiniti is in active conversations with players in that bracket. The company is also monitoring several acquisition targets.

The bunker industry has long carried a reputation for opacity and malpractice. Increased transparency is not for everyone—shadow fleet operators, which have drawn attention this year due to U.S. action against Iran and sanctions on Russia, are unlikely to adopt the platform. But Carlsen argues there is a substantial market of legitimate operators who want to demonstrate compliance with regulations and distance themselves from illicit activity. For those operators, transparency becomes a commercial advantage. The question now is whether Ofiniti can convert that advantage into the scale it projects—and whether the industry's traditional resistance to visibility will hold or finally give way.

We are not a procurement system, and we're not a voyage or routing system. What we focus on is connecting the operational layer around bunkering.
— Tue Raguse, CEO of Ofiniti
As a ship owner, what I saw was how important it is that the barges arrive in time. If a barge is late, you risk that you get delayed with your departure, and that has huge financial implications.
— Torben Carlsen, chair of Ofiniti and former DFDS CEO
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Ship & Bunker ↗
Kontakt FAQ