On a grey November afternoon at the Emirates, Arsenal stepped into the international break carrying a six-point lead, earned by a single goal from captain Martin Odegaard in the 72nd minute against Hull City. Yet much of the talk before that moment belonged to a contested decision, in which a referee's chosen pivot reshaped a moment of expectation into a free-kick for the visitors. It is the familiar tale of football's modern age: a rule designed to bring fairness into the frame, but whose edges still leave room for argument. Arsenal's march continues, though the question of how to turn territ
Odegaard's Lone Goal Edges Arsenal Past Hull and Clear at the Top, With VAR Again Under the Spotlight
Arsenal are top, yet the lowest scorers of the top four
Mark
Odegaard scores in the 72nd minute, Arsenal win 1-0. Why is the VAR moment the thing people talk about?
Mimi
Because it came in the first half and everyone in the ground thought a penalty was coming. Hallam was already describing the foul when he switched to offside against Havertz. That reversal is what stuck.
Mark
And the rules back that up?
Mimi
Partly. A foul before an offside player touches the ball or challenges is supposed to come first. Darren Cann said it should have been a penalty, though he called the law very ambiguous.
Luke
Worth saying the explanation of Oliver's thinking is the writer's reading, not a statement from him. The second-phase idea is plausible, but nobody has confirmed it was his reasoning.
Mark
Fair. Are there precedents?
Mimi
Kane in 2019 and Schar two years ago got penalties while offside. Ouattara last December had his ruled out, though he seemed to be engaging with a defender.
Luke
So the precedents are inconsistent, and that is the real finding. One case isn't enough to say which interpretation is correct.
Mark
What about Arsenal's scoring?
Mimi
They are top with nine wins from 10 but the lowest scorers in the top four, with no more than two goals in a league game since opening day. Saka is out, and Tzolis and Havertz have had hamstring problems.
Luke
The injuries are the explanation offered, but the piece doesn't prove they cause the drought. Arteta himself points to efficiency and approach against low blocks.
O Pulso
- A first-half penalty that the whole Emirates expected was overturned by a VAR offside call on Kai Havertz, leaving the crowd stunned mid-cheer.
- Liverpool supporters are seething at the irony, having been refused a similar shirt-pull penalty only a week earlier.
- Arsenal broke a scoreless stalemate through Martin Odegaard's 72nd-minute finish, opening a six-point gap at the top of the table.
- Their scoring has been thin, with Bukayo Saka sidelined and no more than two league goals since the opening day, so Arteta is urging sharper, quicker finishing.
- Arsenal sit on nine wins from ten and are chasing back-to-back titles for the first time in a century.
On a grey November afternoon at the Emirates, Arsenal stepped into the international break carrying a six-point lead, earned by a single goal from captain Martin Odegaard in the 72nd minute against Hull City. Yet much of the talk before that moment belonged to a contested decision, in which a referee's chosen pivot reshaped a moment of expectation into a free-kick for the visitors. It is the familiar tale of football's modern age: a rule designed to bring fairness into the frame, but whose edges still leave room for argument. Arsenal's march continues, though the question of how to turn territory into goals now hangs quietly over their ambitions.
Arsenal went into the international break six points clear at the top of the Premier League after a 1-0 win over Hull City at the Emirates. The decisive moment came in the 72nd minute, when captain Martin Odegaard bundled the ball home from close range in a match that had otherwise drifted along quietly.
Before that, the afternoon belonged to a VAR decision. Referee Farai Hallam was sent to the monitor to review a shirt pull by Hull's Nobel Mendy on Kai Havertz, and the crowd had already begun to cheer what looked like a certain penalty. Then the call changed: Havertz was ruled offside, and Hull were awarded a free-kick. Liverpool fans noticed the irony, since they had been denied a similar shirt-pull penalty only the week before.
The law itself is murky. Former referee Darren Cann argued the foul should have come first, but precedents point both ways, and the likely reasoning is that Havertz was the only attacker who could still have been involved in the play.
The larger worry for Arsenal is goals. They lead the table yet score the fewest of the top four, and Saka's injury has thinned their attack. Arteta says the answer is to be more efficient and a little more chaotic, and with nine wins from ten, the title chase remains firmly on track.
Arsenal went into the international break six points clear at the top of the Premier League after beating Hull City 1-0 at the Emirates, and the goal that did it arrived in the 72nd minute. Martin Odegaard, the captain, bundled the ball home from close range in a game that had otherwise drifted along without much incident.
The result was Arsenal's 34th 1-0 win under Mikel Arteta, and no side has recorded more since he was appointed in 2019. It also took them to 27 points from 10 games, matching their best start to a Premier League season under the Spaniard, set in 2022-23. They have now won their last 10 home games in all competitions, keeping eight clean sheets across that run.
Before Odegaard scored, the afternoon's story looked likely to be a VAR decision in the first half. Referee Farai Hallam was sent to the pitchside monitor to review a shirt pull by Hull's Nobel Mendy on Kai Havertz. Everyone in the ground seemed to expect a penalty, and the cheers had started as Hallam began explaining the foul to the crowd. Then he pivoted: Havertz was ruled offside, and play restarted with a free-kick to Hull. The VAR was Michael Oliver.
The irony was unlikely to be lost on Liverpool supporters. Last weekend they were refused a VAR penalty for a shirt pull when Arsenal's Jurrien Timber tugged back Alexander Isak. Havertz, unlike Isak, made sure everybody, Oliver included, knew a defender had hold of him.
The weekend had already produced other disputes. On Friday, Coventry City were denied what looked like a clear penalty against Everton for a hair pull by James Tarkowski on Caleb Yirenkyi, and Thierno Barry's goal for Everton, making it 2-1, came when the ball appeared to come off his hand. In Saturday's early game between Leeds and Tottenham, Leeds wanted a penalty for handball against Mateus Fernandes, though replays showed the ball hit his shoulder. Then came a possible red card for Jayden Bogle's challenge on Mathys Tel. VAR Tony Harrington took four minutes to decide the foul lacked sufficient force. Tel went off injured, and referee John Brooks had not even shown a yellow card on the pitch.
The law on the Havertz incident is murky. If an offside player running for the ball is fouled before playing it or challenging an opponent, the foul comes first, which stops defenders getting free rein to foul an attacker just because he is offside. Former referee Darren Cann told Match of the Day the foul should have taken precedence and it should have been a penalty, though he called the law very ambiguous. Precedents point both ways: an offside Harry Kane was given a penalty after being pulled down by Shkodran Mustafi in February 2019, and Newcastle won a spot-kick against Bournemouth when Adam Smith tugged back an offside Fabian Schar two years ago. Yet last December Brentford's Dango Ouattara had a penalty against Leeds ruled out for offside, although he appeared to be engaging with Gabriel Gudmundsson as the ball was played.
The likely reasoning is that officials weigh whether the attacker could become involved in a second phase, for example if a team-mate played the ball first and made him onside. Kane and Schar could have benefited from that. Havertz was the only attacker with any chance of being involved, so the VAR judged offside the fair outcome.
The bigger question for Arsenal is goals. Despite leading the table, they are the lowest scorers among the top four, and they have not scored more than twice in the league since beating Coventry 3-0 on the opening day. Bukayo Saka is out with a quadriceps injury. Christos Tzolis has looked less of a threat since a hamstring injury with Greece, and Havertz has not been at the same level since his own hamstring problem with Germany, even though he scored the winner against Liverpool. Viktor Gyokeres is second choice, Arteta is still finding how best to use Eberechi Eze, and Noni Madueke is trying to fill Saka's gap.
Arteta said the answer is to be more efficient, pointing to two one-on-ones with the keeper, a penalty claim, and a bouncing ball in the box. He said the team sometimes tries to score a perfect goal against low blocks and needs to be more chaotic, and score earlier. With nine wins from 10, Arsenal are well placed to defend their title and win back-to-back championships for the first time in 100 years.
Citações Notáveis
We need to find ways to be more efficient, sometimes even more pragmatic.— Mikel Arteta, Arsenal manager
The foul should have taken precedence over the offside and it should have been a penalty. The law is very ambiguous though.— Darren Cann, former referee, on Match of the Day
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em BBC News ↗
Sports