For more than three decades, the sea has quietly drawn down a growing share of the carbon humanity releases by burning fossil fuels, while the forests and soils of the land have not kept pace with the rising load. A team at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, drawing on decades of air samples gathered from remote corners of the planet and published in Science, has traced this divergence with a patience that the subject demands. Their finding unsettles a comfortable assumption in climate projections: that the living land will keep absorbing more as the air grows richer in CO2. The question now
Oceans Absorb a Growing Share of Fossil Carbon as Land Sinks Stall, Scripps Study Finds
The land sink peaked around 2009 and has generally declined since.
Why does it matter that oxygen is part of this?
Because burning fuel consumes oxygen, and land plants release it while taking up CO2. The ocean takes up CO2 without touching oxygen. Tracking both gases lets the team split the sink between sea and land.
So what did the split show?
The ocean took in 2.8 billion metric tons of CO2 a year from 1990 to 2019, about 35% of emissions. Land took about 1 billion tons of carbon a year, around 13%, with no long-term growth.
Careful with the units. The ocean figure is given in CO2, and the growth rate of 0.63 is in tons of carbon. Those aren't the same measure, so don't compare them directly.
Fair. And the land result disagrees with models?
Many models say the land sink should grow as CO2 and nitrogen fertilize plants. To square that with the data, deforestation emissions would have had to rise, but current estimates show them declining.
Worth saying that's a mismatch, not a diagnosis. The source doesn't say which part of the models is wrong.
Is the ocean sink safe, then?
Not necessarily. Warmer water holds less CO2 and mixes less into the deep ocean. Those are reasons it could weaken, though the study doesn't report that it has.
Right, that's a future risk. And Morgan calling the land sink possibly fragile is his interpretation, not a measured outcome.
O Pulso
- The ocean is steadily swallowing roughly a third of fossil fuel emissions, and its appetite is growing with each decade.
- The land, long assumed to be a reliable partner in absorbing carbon, has stopped growing its uptake and has been weakening since around 2009.
- Climate models that counted on forests and soils fertilized by rising CO2 now face a serious discrepancy that researchers must resolve.
- Warming waters threaten to slow the ocean's absorption and loosen its grip on carbon, leaving the planet's buffers under growing strain.
For more than three decades, the sea has quietly drawn down a growing share of the carbon humanity releases by burning fossil fuels, while the forests and soils of the land have not kept pace with the rising load. A team at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, drawing on decades of air samples gathered from remote corners of the planet and published in Science, has traced this divergence with a patience that the subject demands. Their finding unsettles a comfortable assumption in climate projections: that the living land will keep absorbing more as the air grows richer in CO2. The question now is whether either great sink can be trusted to keep doing its work as the world warms.
Since 1990, the ocean has taken up more and more of the carbon dioxide released by burning fossil fuels, while the net uptake by forests, soils and other land ecosystems has stayed flat. The finding comes from scientists at UC San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, published in Science, and rests on more than thirty years of air measurements gathered at remote sites around the world.
The method is elegant in its patience. Burning fuel releases CO2 and consumes oxygen, while photosynthesis on land does the reverse. By tracking both gases together, the team could tell how much carbon went into the sea and how much into living land. The ocean absorbed about 2.8 billion metric tons of CO2 a year, roughly 35 percent of fossil emissions, and that uptake has been strengthening steadily. Its cost is real, including the acidification that lowers seawater pH.
The land told a different story. It absorbed about a billion tons of carbon a year, around 13 percent of emissions, but without any lasting growth. It peaked around 2009 and has generally declined since. That clashes with many climate models, which expect plants to thrive on extra CO2 and nitrogen. "It was very surprising to see how the net land sink has not kept pace with rising CO2 levels," said Eric Morgan, the study's lead author. "Our data underscore that the land sink may be pretty fragile."
The ocean's growing role may not last. Warmer water holds less CO2 and mixes less readily into the deep, where carbon can stay sequestered for centuries. Together the two sinks have offset about half of fossil emissions, a buffer the planet cannot afford to lose. Because climate models set the pathways for emissions reductions, getting these sinks right matters greatly. Ralph Keeling, who co-authored the work, noted that sustaining such measurements year after year is difficult, but the understanding they bring to the carbon cycle is immense.
Since 1990, the ocean has taken up a growing amount of the carbon dioxide released by burning fossil fuels, while the net uptake by forests, soils and other land ecosystems has not grown at all. That is the central finding of a study led by scientists at UC San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, published Nov. 12 in Science.
The work rests on more than 30 years of air measurements from the Scripps O2 Program. Researchers have collected regular air samples at remote sites around the world, shipped them back to Scripps, and measured the oxygen and carbon dioxide in each. The two gases together carry the signal. Burning coal, gas and oil produces CO2 and consumes oxygen. On land, photosynthesis draws down CO2 and releases oxygen. In the ocean, CO2 is absorbed mainly through reactions in seawater that do not affect oxygen. By following long-term trends in both gases, the team could separate how much carbon went into the sea from how much went into land ecosystems.
From 1990 to 2019, the ocean absorbed an average of 2.8 billion metric tons of CO2 per year, about 35% of fossil fuel emissions over that period. The ocean sink strengthened by 0.63 billion metric tons of carbon per year with each passing decade. That uptake slows the rise of CO2 in the atmosphere, but it carries a cost for the ocean itself, including lower pH through ocean acidification.
The net land sink told a different story. Land ecosystems took up an average of 1 billion metric tons of carbon per year over the same three decades, about 13% of fossil emissions. There was no notable long-term growth, though the sink swung widely in strength from one decade to the next. It peaked in the decade centered on 2009 and has generally declined since.
That result conflicts with many computer models of land absorption, which show the natural land sink growing as rising CO2 and nitrogen fertilize plant growth. For those models to hold, emissions from deforestation and other land-use change would have had to rise enough to cancel the growth. Current estimates show those emissions falling. "It was very surprising to see how the net land sink has not kept pace with rising CO2 levels," said Eric Morgan, a Scripps project scientist and the study's lead author. "Our data underscore that the land sink may be pretty fragile."
The ocean's growing role may not last. Warmer water holds less CO2, and warmer surface water mixes less efficiently into the deep ocean, where carbon can be locked away from the atmosphere for many hundreds of years. Together, the land and ocean sinks have offset roughly half of fossil fuel emissions, slowing warming. "Without the land and ocean absorbing half the CO2 from fossil fuel emissions, we would be living on a very different planet," Morgan said, noting that the sinks cannot be observed directly.
The study stresses that representing these sinks accurately matters, because climate models define the emissions-reduction pathways needed to meet a temperature target. Ralph Keeling, a Scripps geosciences professor and co-author, said keeping such measurements going year after year is not easy, but the payoff for understanding the carbon cycle is huge.
Keeling founded the O2 Program in 1989. It now maintains 10 sampling sites along a Pacific transect from the high Arctic to the South Pole, and it is a companion to the Keeling Curve, the CO2 record begun at Mauna Loa by Charles David Keeling in 1958. Funding came from the U.S. National Science Foundation, NOAA and Schmidt Sciences, with added support for the University of Exeter authors from the EU's OceanICU and UK Research and Innovation. Co-authors include researchers from NCAR and UC Santa Barbara, Exeter, the Rochester Institute of Technology, the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Japan's National Institute for Environmental Studies, and NOAA and CIRES at the University of Colorado Boulder.
Citações Notáveis
It was very surprising to see how the net land sink has not kept pace with rising CO2 levels.— Eric Morgan, Scripps project scientist and lead author
It's not easy to keep these kinds of measurements going year after year, but the payoff is huge.— Ralph Keeling, Scripps professor and co-author (paraphrased)