In a court filing this week, New York Attorney General Letitia James laid out what her long investigation has found about the Trump Organization: a pattern of asset valuations that were, in her office's account, fraudulent or misleading, used to win loans and tax advantages. Nothing has been charged, and no civil suit has yet been filed, but the filing puts a pattern on the public record at a moment when the former president's finances and his political future are tangled together. Such disputes over how much a fortune is worth have followed Trump for decades, and the question of when an exagg
NY Attorney General Says Evidence Shows Trump Company Inflated Asset Values for Loans and Tax Breaks
It isn't illegal to fib to the public about a penthouse. Lying to a bank could be.
Why did James put all this in a public filing now?
The formal aim was to convince a judge that Trump, Don Jr. and Ivanka should testify under oath. But the filing also lays out her evidence for the public.
Worth saying: these are the attorney general's allegations in a legal memo. Nothing has been proven in court, and Trump hasn't been charged.
What's the core of the allegation?
That the company inflated asset values on financial statements given to banks and tax authorities. The example is the penthouse, valued $200 million higher by claiming it was nearly three times its real size.
And why does the audience matter, banks versus the public?
Bragging to the public about a penthouse isn't illegal. Misstating values to lenders or tax authorities could be.
The $300 million Deutsche Bank figure is the attorney general's account of what the statements helped secure. The filing doesn't settle that, and the Trumps call the whole probe baseless.
Is this connected to the tax fraud case?
No. That's the Manhattan DA's case against the company and Allen Weisselberg over off-the-books perks. It's separate, though the DA's grand jury is looking at many of the same issues.
And we don't know yet whether James will sue, or whether the judge will compel testimony. Both are open.
So what's actually decided?
Nothing yet. The next real step is the judge's ruling on questioning under oath.
Il Polso
- A court filing accuses the Trump Organization of inflating asset values to win loans and tax deductions, and the claims land with immediate force.
- A Manhattan penthouse allegedly overvalued by $200 million and $300 million in Deutsche Bank loans put a concrete number on the accusation.
- Attorney General James is pushing a judge to compel sworn testimony from Trump and two of his children, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump.
- The Trump Organization calls the probe baseless and politically driven, while a separate Manhattan grand jury is already weighing criminal charges.
- A judge's ruling on compelled testimony is the next gate, and a civil case could bring penalties or business bans if it advances.
In a court filing this week, New York Attorney General Letitia James laid out what her long investigation has found about the Trump Organization: a pattern of asset valuations that were, in her office's account, fraudulent or misleading, used to win loans and tax advantages. Nothing has been charged, and no civil suit has yet been filed, but the filing puts a pattern on the public record at a moment when the former president's finances and his political future are tangled together. Such disputes over how much a fortune is worth have followed Trump for decades, and the question of when an exaggeration becomes a lie to a lender or a tax authority is one the courts now have to answer.
On Tuesday, New York Attorney General Letitia James used a court filing to lay out much of what her investigators have found after years of looking into former President Donald Trump. The memo argues that the Trump Organization relied on "fraudulent or misleading" valuations of its assets while seeking loans and tax breaks. The filing charges no one. Trump has not been charged with wrongdoing, and James has not decided whether to file a civil lawsuit. What she has done is put a pattern on the record.
James, a Democrat first elected attorney general in 2018, has a long history with Trump, having sued him several times over his policies as president. The investigation's central distinction is a subtle one. Exaggerating a penthouse's worth to the public is not illegal, but lying about asset values to banks, partners or tax authorities could be. According to her office, the company repeatedly used unsupported methods to inflate what it owned. One example: the Manhattan penthouse was allegedly valued $200 million too high by claiming it was nearly three times its real size. Those inflated statements were submitted to banks, and her office says they helped secure $300 million in Deutsche Bank loans. Overvalued land donations in New York and California were also used to justify millions in tax deductions.
The filing's immediate aim is to have a judge force Trump, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump to answer questions under oath. A law professor, Stephen Gillers, suggested James also feels a duty to explain herself to the public, given Trump's sharp claims that the probe is political. The company, which runs his towers, hotels, golf courses and marketing deals, dismissed the investigation as baseless, and Donald Trump Jr. called for her disbarment.
The company already faces separate tax fraud charges brought in July by the Manhattan district attorney, along with its chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg. A grand jury convened by that office is also examining many of the same issues. For now, the next step belongs to a judge. If James's civil probe concludes with a case, she could seek financial penalties or a ban on certain business involvement. Politically, the filing is unlikely to change minds, and even an indictment would not block a 2024 run.
On Tuesday, after years of investigating former President Donald Trump, New York Attorney General Letitia James used a court filing to lay out much of what her investigators have found. The legal memo argues that the Republican's company relied on "fraudulent or misleading" valuations of its assets while seeking loans and tax breaks.
The filing does not charge Trump with anything. He has not been charged with any wrongdoing, and James has not yet decided whether to file a civil lawsuit at all. What she has done is put a pattern on the public record.
James, a Democrat elected attorney general in 2018, has a long history with Trump. She sued him multiple times on behalf of the state over his policies as president, and she has also sued the National Rifle Association. She was instrumental in Gov. Andrew Cuomo's fall from power, releasing a report over the summer that said he sexually harassed 11 women. She briefly ran for governor last fall before deciding to seek reelection as attorney general.
Her office has been examining whether the Trump Organization obtained loans or tax breaks by lying about the value of Trump's assets. The distinction matters. Trump was scrutinized over the size of his fortune long before he reached the White House, and it is not illegal to exaggerate to the public what a penthouse is worth. It could be a crime, though, to lie about asset values to banks, business partners or tax authorities.
According to James's office, investigators found the company repeatedly used dubious or unsupported methods to inflate the worth of what it owned. One example among many: the filing says the company raised the estimated value of Trump's Manhattan penthouse by $200 million by claiming it was nearly three times its actual size. Financial statements carrying the inflated figures were then submitted to banks to get credit and to meet the terms of existing loans. The office says such statements once helped Trump secure $300 million in loans from Deutsche Bank. The filing also says the company overvalued land donations in New York and California to justify millions of dollars in tax deductions.
The immediate purpose of the filing was to persuade a judge that Trump and two of his children, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, should be forced to answer questions under oath. New York University law professor Stephen Gillers said James likely also feels "she has a duty to tell the public what she is doing and why," given Trump's intense criticism of the investigation as politically motivated. Gillers added that it may serve as a warning too: "It's like when a country displays its guns and tanks in a military parade, meant to warn opponents, 'Don't mess with us.'"
The Trump Organization, the company through which Trump manages his office towers, hotels, golf courses and marketing deals, called the investigation "baseless" and politically driven. It said James had "defrauded New Yorkers by basing her entire candidacy on a promise to get Trump at all costs without having seen a shred of evidence and in violation of every conceivable ethical rule." Donald Trump Jr. tweeted that she should be disbarred.
The company is already in legal trouble elsewhere. In July, it and its chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, were indicted on tax fraud charges, accused of conspiring to pay senior executives lucrative fringe benefits off the books. That case, overseen by the Manhattan district attorney, is separate from James's civil probe.
Next, a judge will decide whether Trump, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. must submit to questioning. When her investigation concludes, James could sue to seek financial penalties or a ban on involvement in certain kinds of business. The Manhattan district attorney has separately convened a grand jury to examine many of the same issues. Politically, the filing is unlikely to shift much, as supporters and critics are firmly set. Even an indictment or conviction would not bar a 2024 run, and Trump has already used the probe to rally supporters, airing an anti-James video at an Arizona rally last weekend.
Citazioni salienti
She has a duty to tell the public what she is doing and why.— Stephen Gillers, NYU law professor
The investigation is baseless and politically motivated.— Trump Organization statement (paraphrased)