Nvidia denies DeepSeek is using smuggled Blackwell chips despite market impact

We pursue any tip we receive, but such smuggling seems far-fetched.
Nvidia's response to allegations that DeepSeek obtained restricted Blackwell chips through illegal channels.
Mark

When DeepSeek released that model in January, what exactly made people so nervous about it?

Mimi

It wasn't just that the model worked well. It was that it worked well cheaply. American companies had been spending enormous sums to build comparable systems. DeepSeek seemed to do it for a fraction of the cost. That gap suggested either a breakthrough in efficiency or access to resources people thought were restricted.

Mark

And that's why people started asking about the chips?

Mimi

Exactly. Advanced AI requires enormous computing power. Nvidia's Blackwell chips are the gold standard for that work. The US has banned their export to China specifically to prevent this kind of scenario. So when DeepSeek succeeded, the natural question was: how did they get the hardware?

Mark

But Nvidia says they found no evidence of smuggling.

Mimi

Right. They're saying the scenario itself seems implausible—these elaborate phantom data centers that get built, hidden, then dismantled and moved. It's a lot of moving parts. But they also say they investigate any credible tip, which suggests they take the possibility seriously even if they haven't found proof.

Mark

What about Trump's announcement this week? Does that change anything?

Mimi

It signals a different calculation about what's possible. Instead of trying to block chip sales entirely, the new approach is to allow them under conditions—revenue sharing, approved customers, government oversight. It's a shift from restriction to managed access.

Mark

Is that a win for Nvidia or for China?

Mimi

It's complicated. Nvidia gets to sell into a massive market. China gets access to advanced chips. The US gets revenue and maintains some control through the approval process. But it also suggests the old export ban strategy wasn't working as intended, or at least that the administration thinks the costs outweigh the benefits.

Mark

So we still don't know if DeepSeek used smuggled chips?

Mimi

No. The allegation is out there, Nvidia has denied it, and the investigation presumably continues. But the policy shift suggests that even if they did, the US response is moving toward managed coexistence rather than outright prohibition.

  • DeepSeek's R1 model shocked global markets in January 2025, built at a fraction of American competitors' costs and raising urgent questions about how China had closed the AI gap so quickly.
  • A report from The Information alleged DeepSeek used smuggled Nvidia Blackwell chips — among the most powerful in existence and strictly banned from export to China — to train its next-generation models.
  • Nvidia pushed back hard, calling the smuggling scenario 'far-fetched' and stating it had found no evidence of phantom data centers being built, dismantled, and secretly reassembled inside China.
  • The controversy lands against a shifting policy backdrop: Trump has now approved Nvidia's sale of H200 chips to China under a 25-percent revenue-sharing deal, signaling a break from Biden-era export restrictions.
  • Whether DeepSeek's breakthrough came from smuggled hardware, older chips used more cleverly, or homegrown designs remains unresolved — but the question itself reveals how much is at stake in the global race for AI supremacy.

In the shadow of DeepSeek's startling January 2025 AI breakthrough — one that erased billions from American markets and unsettled assumptions about China's technological pace — a deeper question has taken hold: where did the computing power come from? Allegations surfaced this week that Nvidia's export-restricted Blackwell chips had been smuggled into China to fuel DeepSeek's ambitions, a claim Nvidia swiftly and firmly rejected as implausible. The episode arrives at a moment when chip access has become a proxy for geopolitical power, and when even the rules governing that access are visibly in flux — with President Trump now permitting limited Nvidia sales to China under a revenue-sharing arrangement that would have been unthinkable under his predecessor.

When DeepSeek released its R1 model in January 2025, the reaction in American financial markets was swift and severe. The model performed at a level that rivaled US competitors, yet had reportedly been built at a fraction of the cost. Billions in stock valuations vanished within days, and a single uncomfortable question rose to the surface: how had a Chinese startup achieved this, and with what hardware?

This week, The Information offered one possible answer — that DeepSeek had acquired smuggled Nvidia Blackwell chips, some of the most advanced processors available, which are subject to strict US export controls barring their sale to China. The allegation implied an elaborate diversion operation designed to circumvent Washington's strategy of limiting China's access to cutting-edge AI infrastructure.

Nvidia responded quickly and skeptically. A company spokesperson told CNBC there was no evidence to support the claims, describing the scenario of phantom data centers being built, smuggled, and secretly reconstructed as implausible. The company nonetheless affirmed it takes credible tips about chip diversion seriously and investigates when leads emerge.

The denial arrives at a moment of genuine policy turbulence. President Trump this week announced that Nvidia would be allowed to sell its H200 chips to approved Chinese customers, with the US government receiving 25 percent of the resulting revenue — a notable departure from the Biden administration's approach of requiring degraded export versions. Trump framed the shift as a way to benefit American workers while preserving national security, and said Chinese President Xi Jinping had responded positively to the arrangement.

Whether DeepSeek's capabilities stem from smuggled hardware, more efficient use of older chips, or independent design remains an open question. But the intensity of scrutiny surrounding it reflects something larger: in the contest between the US and China over artificial intelligence, control of the most powerful chips has become inseparable from questions of national power — and the rules of that contest are being rewritten in real time.

In January 2025, a Chinese artificial intelligence startup called DeepSeek released a model that sent shockwaves through global markets. The R1 model worked remarkably well—and it had been built at a fraction of what American competitors spent. Within days, billions of dollars evaporated from US stock valuations as investors grappled with the implications: China was advancing faster in AI than many had assumed possible. The question that followed was immediate and uncomfortable: how had DeepSeek done it? Where had the computing power come from?

This week, The Information published a report suggesting an answer. According to the outlet, DeepSeek had acquired smuggled Nvidia Blackwell chips—among the most powerful processors Nvidia makes—and was using them to train its next generation of models. The allegation carried weight because Blackwell chips are subject to strict US export controls. Washington has banned their sale to China as part of a deliberate strategy to preserve American dominance in the AI race. If the report was true, it would mean DeepSeek had circumvented those restrictions through an elaborate smuggling operation.

Nvidia moved quickly to push back. A company spokesperson told CNBC that the claims seemed implausible and that Nvidia had found no evidence to support them. "We haven't seen any substantiation or received tips of 'phantom data centers' constructed to deceive us and our OEM partners, then deconstructed, smuggled and reconstructed somewhere else," the spokesperson said. The company acknowledged the scenario was far-fetched but added that it takes any credible tip about chip diversion seriously and investigates leads when they surface.

The denial matters because Nvidia's relationship with China has become a flashpoint in Washington. Blackwell chips are foundational to the AI boom—they power everything from large language models to the data centers that train them. Control over who gets access to these chips has become a matter of national security policy, not just commercial competition. The stakes are high enough that they have drawn presidential attention.

This week, President Donald Trump announced a significant shift in that policy. He said Nvidia would be permitted to sell its H200 chips to approved customers in China, provided the US government receives 25 percent of the revenue from those sales. Trump framed the move as a way to support American workers and manufacturers while maintaining national security safeguards. He claimed to have discussed the arrangement with Chinese President Xi Jinping, who he said responded positively. The announcement also signaled that the same approach would apply to other American chipmakers like AMD and Intel.

The policy reversal highlights the tension between commercial interests and geopolitical caution. The Biden administration had pushed companies to develop degraded versions of their chips for export, a strategy Trump criticized as wasteful and counterproductive. His administration, he suggested, would take a different approach: allow sales under conditions that protect American interests while keeping the US ahead in AI.

What remains unclear is whether DeepSeek actually obtained Blackwell chips through smuggling, or whether the company achieved its breakthrough through other means—perhaps by using older, less restricted processors more efficiently, or by developing its own chip designs. Nvidia's denial suggests the company sees no hard evidence of diversion. But the fact that the question is being asked at all underscores how central chip access has become to the US-China competition in artificial intelligence, and how quickly the rules governing that competition can shift.

We haven't seen any substantiation or received tips of 'phantom data centers' constructed to deceive us and our OEM partners, then deconstructed, smuggled and reconstructed somewhere else.
— Nvidia spokesperson to CNBC
I have informed President Xi that the United States will allow NVIDIA to ship its H200 products to approved customers in China under conditions that allow for continued strong National Security.
— President Donald Trump
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Times of India ↗
Contáctanos FAQ