For generations, surgeons removing brain tumors have worked at the edge of the visible, unable to fully distinguish cancer from the healthy tissue surrounding it. A new ultrasound technique called shear wave elastography, tested across four London hospitals, may offer a way through that uncertainty — detecting residual tumor tissue with 94 percent sensitivity by mapping the stiffness of what lies beneath the surgeon's hands. The technology does not replace human judgment, but it may become one of medicine's more consequential second opinions, arriving in real time, at the operating table, wher
Novel ultrasound technique shows promise for detecting residual brain tumor tissue during surgery
Surgeons could greatly increase confidence that no cancerous tissue is going to be left behind
So this scan detects tumors better than surgeons can see them—94 percent versus 36 percent. That's a huge gap. Why can't surgeons just look harder?
Because once you open the brain, the tumor and healthy tissue can look very similar. The scan measures stiffness, which is a physical property surgeons can't assess by sight or touch alone. It's literally giving them information their senses can't provide.
But wait—the scan also produces false positives at a 23 percent rate. That means it's flagging things that aren't actually tumors. How do you know those false positives won't lead surgeons to remove healthy tissue?
That's exactly why the researchers say it should be used with surgeon judgment, not instead of it. The surgeon still decides whether to act on what the scan shows.
And the comparison was against MRI scans done after surgery, right? So they're looking at what was left behind, not what was actually there during the operation.
Right. The study shows the scan is as good as post-op MRI at detecting residual tissue. But we don't yet know if using it during surgery actually changes patient outcomes—fewer relapses, longer survival. That's the real question.
That's true. This is proof of concept. The researchers are clear that larger trials are needed before it becomes standard practice.
How much faster is it than MRI?
MRI would add nearly two hours to surgery. Shear wave scans happen in real time during the operation.
And cost matters too. MRI machines aren't usually in operating rooms. This technique uses ultrasound equipment that's already there.
So if it works as hoped, it could become routine pretty quickly.
If the larger trials confirm the findings, yes. But that's still ahead of us.
El Pulso
- Brain tumor surgery carries an irreducible danger: incomplete removal raises the risk of relapse, yet surgeons alone detected only 36% of remaining cancer tissue in the study.
- Shear wave elastography — which maps tissue stiffness by measuring how fast vibrations travel — identified residual tumor 2.5 times more effectively than the unaided surgical eye.
- The technique's speed and low cost give it a practical edge over intraoperative MRI, which is expensive, rarely available in operating rooms, and would add nearly two hours to surgery.
- A significant caveat tempers the excitement: the scans flagged healthy tissue as suspicious 23% of the time, meaning surgeon expertise remains essential to interpret the results.
- Researchers and neurosurgeons agree the tool works best as a supplement — giving surgeons a real-time map of suspicious stiffness while their own experience governs the final decision.
- Larger clinical trials are still required before the technique becomes standard practice, but this study marks the first demonstration of shear wave elastography as a tool to confirm tumor removal is complete during surgery.
For generations, surgeons removing brain tumors have worked at the edge of the visible, unable to fully distinguish cancer from the healthy tissue surrounding it. A new ultrasound technique called shear wave elastography, tested across four London hospitals, may offer a way through that uncertainty — detecting residual tumor tissue with 94 percent sensitivity by mapping the stiffness of what lies beneath the surgeon's hands. The technology does not replace human judgment, but it may become one of medicine's more consequential second opinions, arriving in real time, at the operating table, where the stakes are highest.
Surgeons removing brain tumors have long faced a fundamental problem: the boundary between cancer and healthy tissue is rarely clear to the eye. A new ultrasound technique called shear wave elastography may help close that gap. In a study published in Frontiers in Oncology, researchers found the scans detected residual tumor tissue with 94 percent sensitivity — nearly three times better than surgeon judgment alone, which caught only 36 percent of remaining cancer.
The study followed 26 patients across four London hospitals. During surgery, researchers performed shear wave scans alongside standard 2D ultrasounds, then compared all findings against post-operative MRI. The technique works by sending vibrations through brain tissue and measuring how quickly they travel — tumors, being stiffer than normal brain, transmit the waves faster, producing a map of suspicious areas for surgeons to examine.
The advantage over MRI is practical: shear wave scans are faster, cheaper, and can be performed in real time without extending surgery. But the technique also produced more false alarms than surgeons did, flagging healthy tissue as suspicious in roughly one in four cases. Researchers concluded it works best not as a replacement for surgical expertise but as a supplement — an additional layer of confidence that removable cancer has not been left behind.
The human cost of incomplete removal is not abstract. Dagmar Krafft, a 54-year-old violinist diagnosed with brain cancer in 2013 after a seizure during rehearsal, saw her tumor relapse six years after initial treatment. She underwent surgery in 2019 and now lives under regular monitoring. Hearing of the new technique, she called it fantastic — any tool that helps surgeons work more safely, she said, is worth pursuing.
Professor Jeffrey Bamber, who led the study at The Institute of Cancer Research, described the scan as a quick and affordable way to map tissue stiffness during surgery, helping surgeons locate what they might otherwise miss. Consultant neurosurgeon Neil Dorward called it a practical means of detecting removable tumor invisible to the operating eye, while stressing that experience must still guide the final decision. Larger clinical trials remain necessary before the technique can be adopted as standard practice.
Surgeons removing a brain tumor face an old problem: they cannot always tell where the cancer ends and healthy tissue begins. A new ultrasound technique called shear wave elastography may change that. In a study published in Frontiers in Oncology, researchers found that this type of scan detected leftover tumor tissue with 94 percent sensitivity—nearly three times better than a surgeon's eye alone, which caught only 36 percent of residual cancer.
The study involved 26 patients at four London hospitals: The Institute of Cancer Research, the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, The Royal London Hospital, and University Hospital Southampton. During surgery, researchers performed shear wave scans and standard 2D ultrasounds before, during, and after tumor removal. They also asked surgeons to identify suspicious tissue before showing them the scan results. All three approaches were then compared against post-operative MRI scans, the current gold standard.
Shear wave elastography works by measuring how stiff tissue is. The technique sends vibrations through brain tissue and detects how fast they travel—stiffer tissue transmits the waves more quickly. Brain tumors tend to be stiffer than normal brain tissue, so the scan creates a map of suspicious stiff areas that surgeons can then examine and remove. The advantage is speed and cost. MRI scans, while more accurate, are expensive, rarely available in operating rooms, and would add nearly two hours to surgery time. Shear wave scans can be performed in real time during the operation itself.
The findings came with a caveat. While shear wave scans excelled at detecting tumor tissue that was actually there, they also produced more false alarms than surgeons did. The scans had 77 percent specificity—meaning they sometimes flagged normal tissue as suspicious—compared with 100 percent specificity for surgeon judgment. Standard ultrasound fell between the two at 63 percent specificity. For this reason, researchers believe the technique works best not as a replacement for surgical expertise but as a supplement to it, giving surgeons additional confidence that they have removed all removable cancer.
The stakes are clear. Patient outcomes from brain tumor surgery improve significantly when surgeons remove as much tumor as possible. Incomplete removal increases the risk that cancer will return. Dagmar Krafft, a 54-year-old patient who was not part of the study, experienced this firsthand. She was diagnosed with brain cancer in 2013 after suffering a seizure during an orchestral rehearsal where she played violin. Radiotherapy shrank the tumor, and she entered surveillance. Six years later, in 2019, a routine scan revealed the cancer had relapsed. She underwent surgery to remove as much tumor as possible and now receives regular monitoring. When asked about the new scanning technique, she called it fantastic, saying any technology that helps surgeons do their jobs more safely is encouraging.
Professor Jeffrey Bamber, the study's leader at The Institute of Cancer Research, emphasized the practical value. Shear wave scanning can quickly and affordably map the stiffness of brain and tumor tissue during surgery, he said, allowing surgeons to locate and remove tissue they might otherwise miss. Professor Kevin Harrington, head of the Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging at the same institution, noted that the scan provides real-time guidance as surgeons decide which tissue to remove, with potential to improve outcomes while minimizing damage to healthy brain.
Mr Neil Dorward, a consultant neurosurgeon at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and co-researcher on the study, called the technique a practical means of detecting removable tumor that may not be visible to the operating surgeon. The surgeon must still use experience to decide whether to remove flagged areas, he said, but the technique has potential to substantially improve surgical outcomes.
The research was funded by the Royal Free Charity and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, part of UKRI. While the findings are promising, researchers emphasize that larger clinical trials are needed before the technique can be recommended as standard practice. The study is the first to demonstrate shear wave elastography's potential as a neurosurgical tool to confirm during surgery that tumor removal is complete.
Citas Notables
Ensuring all of a brain tumor is removed without damaging healthy tissue is a major challenge in brain surgery. Using this new type of scan, surgeons could greatly increase confidence that no cancerous tissue is going to be left behind after surgery.— Professor Jeffrey Bamber, study leader, The Institute of Cancer Research, London
This technique provides a very practical means of detecting areas of potentially removable tumor that are not readily visible to the operating surgeon.— Mr Neil Dorward, Consultant Neurosurgeon, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery