Novartis actinium drug shows promise in prostate cancer, even after prior treatment

Trial participants experienced notable side effects including dry mouth and severe anemia requiring further assessment in larger studies.
Energy delivered across a much smaller distance, potential for greater efficacy
How actinium-225's concentrated radiation differs from the lutetium-based therapy Novartis already sells.
Mark

Why does it matter that this new drug works even in patients who already failed Pluvicto?

Mimi

Because it suggests the two drugs attack cancer in different ways, or with different intensity. If you can use them in sequence, you've extended the runway for treating a disease that eventually becomes resistant to everything.

Mark

The response rates are higher in people who haven't been treated yet. Doesn't that undercut the excitement?

Mimi

Not really. It's actually expected—healthier patients respond better to aggressive therapy. What's interesting is that it works at all in the previously treated group. That's the proof of concept. The higher rates in naive patients suggest where the real value might be.

Mark

What's the difference between alpha and beta emitters in plain terms?

Mimi

Think of it as the difference between a focused beam and a spray. Beta spreads its energy over distance. Alpha concentrates it in a tiny space. More energy in a smaller area means more cell death, but also potentially more damage to healthy tissue nearby.

Mark

The side effects sound serious—anemia, dry mouth. Why push forward?

Mimi

Because prostate cancer kills. If you're a man with advanced disease, severe anemia is a problem you can manage. Death is not. The question is whether the benefit outweighs the burden, and that's what the larger trials will answer.

Mark

Why is Novartis suddenly investing 40 percent of cancer R&D into radioligand therapy?

Mimi

Because it works, and because competitors are moving in the same direction. Once you see a technology that delivers results, you follow the money. Pluvicto and Lutathera are already generating billions. The company is doubling down on what's proven.

Mark

What about the supply problem with actinium?

Mimi

It's real, but it's a good problem to have. It means demand might exceed supply. Novartis locked in a long-term deal with Niowave to avoid being caught short. If the drug works, supply will follow.

  • Men whose prostate cancer had already defeated one radioligand therapy were responding to the actinium drug at rates above 50%, suggesting the disease may not have the last word after all.
  • In treatment-naive patients, response rates surpassed 85%, a figure striking enough to reframe how oncologists might sequence these therapies from the very beginning of treatment.
  • Severe anemia and persistent dry mouth shadowed the trial's promising numbers, reminding clinicians that a more powerful weapon can also carry a heavier toll on the body carrying it.
  • Novartis has committed nearly 40% of its cancer R&D budget to radioligand therapies, a strategic wager now drawing competitive pressure from Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and AstraZeneca.
  • The rarity of actinium-225 itself threatens to become the drug's quiet adversary — a supply chain problem that a long-term agreement with isotope producer Niowave is only beginning to address.

At the intersection of nuclear physics and oncology, Novartis has presented early evidence that actinium-225 — a radioactive element that delivers energy with unusual precision — may offer new hope to men whose prostate cancer has resisted existing treatments. Presented at a major oncology gathering in Chicago, the findings suggest that the concentrated, alpha-emitting nature of actinium could outperform the company's own established therapy, Pluvicto, particularly in patients who have never received radioligand treatment before. The results are preliminary, the side effects real, and the supply of the isotope itself finite — yet the moment marks a meaningful step in humanity's long effort to turn the destructive power of radiation into a tool of healing.

Novartis unveiled early trial results for an experimental cancer drug built around actinium-225, a radioactive isotope that delivers energy in a tighter, more concentrated burst than the lutetium-based Pluvicto, the company's existing prostate cancer therapy. The data, presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in Chicago, came from a study of 101 patients and carried a finding that caught attention: the actinium drug appeared to work even in men whose cancer had already resisted Pluvicto.

The numbers varied by patient history. Among those previously treated with Pluvicto, just over half saw their prostate-specific antigen levels fall by at least half — the standard measure of response. Among patients who had never received radioligand therapy at all, that figure climbed above 85 percent. The distinction matters because it hints at a drug that might be deployed earlier in treatment, or used in sequence with Pluvicto to extend a patient's options.

The science behind the difference is physics. Actinium-225 is an alpha emitter, releasing particles that travel a short distance but concentrate enormous energy in that small space — a sharper strike against cancer cells than the broader energy spread of lutetium-177. Novartis's Chief Medical Officer described this concentrated delivery as potentially more lethal to tumors, and the company has placed a substantial institutional bet on the approach, directing nearly 40 percent of its cancer research spending toward radioligand therapies.

Yet the trial's promise arrived alongside real costs. Dry mouth was common among participants, and severe anemia — a dangerous reduction in red blood cells — raised questions that analysts said would need answers in larger studies. Whether these side effects reverse after treatment ends, and how they manifest in healthier patients treated earlier in their disease course, remains to be seen.

Novartis is pressing forward regardless. Two late-stage trials are already underway, and the commercial logic is clear: Pluvicto and Lutathera together generated $2.8 billion in sales last year, drawing rivals including Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca into the space. The remaining obstacle is elemental — actinium-225 is scarce, and scaling production to meet potential demand is not guaranteed. A supply agreement signed in February with U.S. isotope producer Niowave represents the company's attempt to build the infrastructure before it is urgently needed.

Novartis announced early trial results on Sunday for an experimental cancer drug that works differently from anything the company has sold before. The new treatment uses actinium-225, a radioactive isotope that delivers energy in a tighter, more concentrated burst than the lutetium-based drug the company already markets under the name Pluvicto. In a study of 101 patients, the actinium drug showed it could shrink tumors even in men who had already failed treatment with Pluvicto—a finding that suggests the two drugs might work in sequence, or that the newer one might simply be more powerful.

The numbers tell the story. Among patients who had previously received Pluvicto, just over half saw their prostate-specific antigen levels drop by at least half, which is the standard measure of response in prostate cancer. That's meaningful, because these were patients whose cancer had already resisted one radioligand therapy. But the real signal came from patients who had never received Pluvicto at all. More than 85 percent of treatment-naive patients saw their PSA levels fall by half. Among those who had received chemotherapy first, the response rate was 58.8 percent. The data were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in Chicago.

What makes this drug work is physics. Actinium-225 is an alpha emitter, meaning it releases particles that travel only a short distance but pack enormous energy into that small space. Lutetium-177, which Pluvicto uses, is a beta emitter—it spreads its energy over a longer path. Shreeram Aradhye, Novartis's Chief Medical Officer, explained that the concentrated energy delivery of actinium could mean greater killing power against cancer cells. The company is betting heavily on this approach. Radioligand therapies now account for nearly 40 percent of Novartis's cancer research and development spending, a dramatic shift in where the company is placing its bets.

But the early promise comes with a cost. Patients in the trial experienced notable side effects. Dry mouth was common. More concerning was severe anemia—a dangerous drop in red blood cells. TD Cowen analysts, reviewing the data, noted that managing these toxicities would be crucial to the drug's eventual success. Aradhye acknowledged that larger trials will be needed to understand how severe these side effects are and whether they reverse once treatment stops, especially if the company wants to use the drug earlier in the treatment sequence, when patients are healthier and might tolerate it differently.

Novartis is already moving forward. Two late-stage studies of the experimental drug are underway. The company's existing radioligand therapies—Pluvicto and another drug called Lutathera—generated $2.8 billion in combined sales last year, a sign that the market for these targeted radiation treatments is real and growing. Competitors have noticed. Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and AstraZeneca have all acquired radioligand therapy companies in recent years, sensing the same opportunity.

One constraint looms: supply. Actinium-225 is not abundant. The isotope must be produced, and current production capacity may not keep pace with clinical demand if the drug reaches the market and is used widely. Analysts have flagged this as a potential bottleneck. Novartis is thinking ahead. In February, the company signed a long-term supply agreement with Niowave, a U.S.-based medical isotope producer, to secure actinium for future trials and, if the drug is approved, for commercial use. The company is essentially betting that the science will work and that the supply chain can be built to match.

The difference is that much higher amounts of energy are delivered across a much smaller distance, and the potential for greater efficacy.
— Shreeram Aradhye, Novartis Chief Medical Officer
Larger trials will be needed to fully assess the severity and reversibility of side effects, especially if the drug is used in earlier lines of treatment.
— Shreeram Aradhye, Novartis Chief Medical Officer
Contattaci Domande frequenti