No 10 Clarifies Burnham's Stance on Freedom of Movement After Weekend Interviews Stir EU Speculation

"Crucially not leaning either way" — and the public will decide
Downing Street's spokesperson described Burnham's position on the EU relationship after confusion over his weekend interviews.
Mark

Why did Downing Street have to step in at all?

Mimi

Because the weekend interviews were read as softening a long-held position. The Sunday Times piece suggested staying out of free movement was no longer a red line, and that set off the speculation.

Luke

Worth noting that is the paper's reading of his interview. The spokesperson says he is not proposing it.

Mark

So what is the official position?

Mimi

Not leaning either way. He wants a discussion on the long-term relationship, and the public decides.

Luke

But the spokesperson also said the government isn't yet at the stage of confirming whether the public would vote on closer ties. So a referendum is neither promised nor excluded.

Mark

Burnham said no to joining free movement without a referendum, though.

Mimi

Yes, and he ruled out rejoining this parliament. But he said he could fight a later election on rejoining.

Luke

Which is a door left open, not a plan. Nothing in the reporting says he has decided to do it.

Mark

What about Makerfield?

Mimi

Sixty-five percent of his constituents voted to leave. He answered that he isn't rerunning the referendum and that they will be the bosses.

Luke

That answers the tone, not the substance. We don't know what he would actually propose.

Mark

And what's next?

Mimi

The 20 November summit in Brussels, where the focus is practical arrangements.

Luke

The billions the spokesperson mentioned is the government's own claim, with no breakdown given here.

  • A weekend of interviews left Westminster reading the prime minister's words as a signal that free movement might return, and the reading spread faster than any clarification could follow.
  • Downing Street moved to contain the confusion, insisting Burnham is proposing no particular option and is 'crucially not leaning either way'.
  • Burnham ruled out rejoining the EU in this parliament and refused to commit to free movement without a referendum, while leaving a future campaign on rejoining open.
  • Pressure is building in Makerfield, where 65% of voters backed Leave, and the question of whether the public will be asked to decide remains unanswered.
  • All eyes now turn to the Brussels summit on 20 November, where Burnham hopes to secure a better deal and the weekend's talk must meet practical negotiation.

A government that must explain its own leader has found itself in the familiar position of reconciling a sentence with its meaning. Andy Burnham, speaking of an honest conversation about Britain's long-term place in Europe, set off weekend speculation that the country might edge back toward free movement, and on Monday Downing Street stepped in to say that no such proposal exists. The episode sits within a larger, unfinished argument about what Brexit has cost and what Britain might still choose, and it will be tested not in words but at the UK-EU summit in Brussels on 20 November.

Downing Street spent Monday explaining what its own prime minister had meant. Andy Burnham had said an "honest discussion" was needed about Britain's long-term relationship with Europe, and weekend interviews left many reading that as a signal about freedom of movement.

The speculation began with a Sunday Times interview, in which Burnham suggested that staying out of free movement would no longer be a red line in talks on closer EU ties. Further remarks, read as leaving the door open to both a return to free movement and another referendum, deepened the confusion.

A spokesperson was left to draw the line. The prime minister, she said, was not proposing a return to free movement or any other particular option. He wanted to discuss what long-term relationship is best for Britain, and he was "crucially not leaning either way", leaving the decision to the public. For now, she said, his focus was the summit next month, where practical arrangements could add billions to the economy.

Burnham himself was more direct. He ruled out rejoining the EU in this parliament, though he hinted he could campaign on it later, and answered "no" when asked if he would let Britain join the free movement scheme without a referendum. He said he would like to see Britain rejoin in his lifetime, but that the British public must be "the bosses". Challenged over Makerfield, where 65% backed Leave, he insisted the people there would decide.

He also ruled out an early election. Yet the question lingers, and the summit on 20 November will show how much of the weekend's talk survives practical negotiation.

Downing Street spent Monday explaining what its own prime minister had meant. Andy Burnham had said an "honest discussion" was needed about Britain's long-term relationship with Europe, and a series of weekend interviews had left many people reading that as a signal about freedom of movement.

The speculation began with an interview in the Sunday Times. In it, Burnham indicated that staying out of free movement would no longer be a red line in talks about how the UK might move closer to the EU. Further interviews deepened the confusion, because they were read as leaving the door open both to an eventual return to freedom of movement and to another referendum on the question.

A Downing Street spokesperson was left to draw the line. The prime minister, she said, was not proposing a return to freedom of movement, or any other particular option. In her account, he was saying it was time to discuss what kind of long-term relationship with Europe is best for Britain, and he was pointing to the areas such an agreement could cover. She said he was "crucially not leaning either way" and that the decision would rest with the British public. His focus for now, she added, was next month's summit and the practical arrangements the government hopes to agree there, which she said would add billions to the economy.

She did not go further on process. The government, she said, was not yet at the stage of confirming whether the public would be asked to decide on proposals for the UK to move closer to the EU. Pressed on whether Burnham accepted that returning to freedom of movement would mean losing control over legal migration, she said he was not setting out a concrete position either way, only seeking a conversation with the public about the long-term future with the EU.

Burnham himself spoke on Monday. He ruled out rejoining the EU within this parliament, while indicating he could fight a future general election on a promise to take the UK back in. "I'm not going to move away from the red lines that were in the Labour manifesto," he said. Hours later he told journalists "no" when asked whether he would let the UK join the EU freedom of movement scheme without a referendum.

Asked whether he wanted Britain to rejoin, he said that in his lifetime he would like to see it happen, but that he would not move ahead of the public or dictate his own opinions. The British public, he said, must be "the bosses."

He was also challenged over his constituency. In Makerfield, 65% of voters backed leaving the EU. Burnham replied that he had said the referendum would not be rerun and that this was not what he was doing. The people of Makerfield, he said, would decide what happens on Brexit.

He dismissed any prospect of an early election on a changed manifesto. "There is no election coming anytime soon," he told GMB, adding that people might as well put it out of their minds. Yet he left open a later campaign on a pledge to rejoin fully.

Burnham is due in Brussels for the UK-EU summit on 20 November, where he hopes to secure a better deal. He believes the Brexit settlement has weakened the economy and weakened control of immigration, and that it is not good enough for the country. The summit will show how much of the weekend's talk survives contact with practical negotiation.

He is crucially not leaning either way, and that will be for the British public to decide.
— Downing Street spokesperson
There is no election coming anytime soon. People may as well put that out of their mind.
— Andy Burnham, on GMB
Contact Us FAQ