Nike, once a symbol of athletic aspiration and global brand dominance, now faces a reckoning that no amount of restructuring language can fully soften. Under CEO Elliott Hill, the company is cutting jobs, redrawing its geographic map, and retreating from distribution arrangements in China — a market that has delivered nine straight quarters of declining sales. The moment asks a deeper question than any earnings call can answer: whether a brand built on the mythology of winning can find its footing again when the world it once conquered has moved on.
Nike Deepens Restructuring With Job Cuts as China Sales Plummet 26%
Nike will cut an unspecified number of jobs beginning in 2027 as part of its restructuring program.
Things will get worse before they get better in China
Mark
So Nike is cutting jobs and reorganizing. How bad is it really?
Mimi
The China numbers tell you most of what you need to know. Sales down 26% in a single quarter, and that's nine quarters in a row. China is their third-largest market. That's not a blip.
Luke
But we should be careful here—the source doesn't say whether that 26% is typical for a quarter or if it's accelerating. It says the slowdown is accelerating, but we don't have the prior quarter's number to compare.
Mark
Fair. What about the restructuring itself—is it a real fix or just cutting costs?
Mimi
Hill is saying the problem is product. They're not making things people want at full price, so they discount, which trains customers to wait for sales. The restructuring includes opening an India campus and consolidating regions, but the real bet is that they'll innovate better products.
Luke
That's what Hill is saying. But the analyst from BNP Paribas directly contradicts that—he says Nike doesn't have a channel problem, it has a product problem. So the restructuring might be addressing the wrong thing.
Mark
What about the job cuts? How many people are we talking about?
Mimi
That's the thing—Nike hasn't said. They'll notify employees in 2027, but the total number is unknown. They're expecting $2.5 billion in savings through 2031.
Luke
So we know the financial target but not the human cost. That's a gap in the reporting.
Mark
And the China strategy—pulling online sales from retail partners. That sounds risky.
Mimi
It is. Hill himself said it will take multiple seasons and will hurt near-term revenue and profitability. He's essentially saying things will get worse before they get better.
Luke
But again, the question is whether it will work. Analysts are divided. Some think it's the right move on pricing control. Others think it won't convince Chinese consumers to buy Nike at all.
Mark
So we're in a waiting period.
Mimi
Multiple waiting periods. The restructuring unfolds through 2027 and beyond. The China turnaround takes multiple seasons. The savings don't materialize until 2029 and 2030. This is a long game.
El Pulso
- China sales cratered 26% in a single quarter, the ninth consecutive decline in Nike's third-largest market, turning what was once a growth engine into the company's most urgent wound.
- Investors responded swiftly — shares fell 8.5% after hours — as a projected high-single-digit revenue decline for fiscal 2027 signaled that the turnaround is taking far longer than the market had hoped.
- Nike is attempting a sweeping reset: collapsing four geographic regions into three, opening an India campus, and stripping major Chinese retail partners of their online sales rights in a high-stakes bid to reclaim pricing control.
- The company's own CEO admitted the performance business is not yet strong enough to offset weakness across Nike Sportswear, Jordan Brand, and Greater China — a candid acknowledgment that the core identity of the brand is under strain.
- Analysts remain unconvinced, arguing that Nike's China problem is rooted in product relevance, not distribution mechanics, and that the $2.5 billion in projected savings won't materialize meaningfully until 2029 at the earliest.
Nike, once a symbol of athletic aspiration and global brand dominance, now faces a reckoning that no amount of restructuring language can fully soften. Under CEO Elliott Hill, the company is cutting jobs, redrawing its geographic map, and retreating from distribution arrangements in China — a market that has delivered nine straight quarters of declining sales. The moment asks a deeper question than any earnings call can answer: whether a brand built on the mythology of winning can find its footing again when the world it once conquered has moved on.
Nike entered the fall of 2026 carrying the weight of a brand in genuine distress. The company announced sweeping job cuts and a reorganization of its global structure after projecting a high-single-digit revenue decline for fiscal 2027 — a forecast that rattled investors and sent shares down 8.5% in after-hours trading. At the center of the crisis is China, where sales fell 26% in the first quarter, extending a losing streak now nine quarters long in a market that still generates roughly 15% of Nike's annual revenue.
CEO Elliott Hill, who inherited the turnaround mandate two years ago, has staked his tenure on refocusing Nike around core sports and rebuilding wholesale relationships. But the company has struggled to release products that consumers will pay full price for, leading to discounting cycles that erode margins and brand prestige. On the earnings call, Hill was candid about the gap: the performance business simply isn't growing fast enough to compensate for weakness in Nike Sportswear, Jordan Brand, and Greater China. He pointed to a deliberate pullback in Jordan retro releases as part of a longer-term reset — one he acknowledged will take time.
The restructuring is broad in scope. Nike will consolidate from four operating regions to three, open a new campus in India, and begin notifying employees of layoffs in 2027. The cuts are expected to yield $2.5 billion in savings by fiscal 2031, though most of that relief is backloaded into 2029 and 2030. In China specifically, Nike plans to revoke online sales rights from some of its largest retail partners starting in January — a calculated gamble that tighter distribution control can arrest the decline. Hill warned the cleanup will span multiple seasons and will weigh on near-term revenue and profitability before it helps.
Skepticism runs deep on Wall Street. Analysts at BNP Paribas have argued that Nike's China difficulties are fundamentally about product appeal, not channel architecture, and questioned whether the aggressive timeline for dismantling online wholesale will deliver results. North America offered a modest counterpoint — sales rose 2% in the quarter, lifted by World Cup momentum — but even that bright spot dimmed when French star Kylian Mbappe ended his two-decade Nike partnership and signed with Swiss rival On. The symbolic weight of that departure was not lost on observers.
First-quarter revenue of $11.21 billion missed analyst expectations, and while gross margin improved slightly, the underlying demand picture remains soft. S&P Dow Jones Indices removed Nike from the S&P 100 in September after 18 years, a rebalancing decision that nonetheless registered as a cultural signal. The question Hill must answer — and that the market is no longer willing to wait patiently for — is whether Nike's problems are fixable through strategy, or whether something more fundamental about the brand's relationship with consumers has shifted.
Nike is bracing for a difficult year ahead. On Thursday, the company announced it would cut jobs and reorganize its global operations after projecting a high-single-digit revenue decline for fiscal 2027—a forecast that surprised investors and sent the stock down 8.5% in after-hours trading. The announcement came as the sportswear giant confronted a deepening crisis in China, where sales collapsed 26% in the first quarter on a constant-currency basis, marking the ninth consecutive quarter of decline in a market that still accounts for roughly 15% of Nike's annual revenue.
China's deterioration has become the defining problem of CEO Elliott Hill's tenure. Hill took over two years ago with a mandate to revive growth by refocusing on core sports like running and rebuilding relationships with wholesale retailers. But the company has struggled to release products compelling enough to justify full price, forcing it into heavy discounting. On a post-earnings call, Hill acknowledged the bind: "Our Nike performance business is not yet large enough to offset the pressure we're seeing in Nike sportswear, Jordan brand, and Greater China." He signaled that fixing these weak spots "will take time," pointing to a deliberate slowdown in Jordan retro releases as part of the strategy.
The restructuring plan itself is sweeping. Nike will consolidate its operating model from four geographic regions to three—Americas, Asia Pacific and Greater China, and EMEA—while opening a new campus in India to tap local talent and capabilities. The company has not yet determined how many employees will lose their jobs, but notifications will begin in 2027. The layoffs are expected to generate roughly $2.5 billion in savings through fiscal 2031, with most of that relief arriving in 2029 and 2030. This builds on earlier rounds of cuts announced throughout the year.
The China strategy carries particular risk. Starting in January, Nike will pull online sales rights from some of its largest retail partners in the country—a high-stakes gamble that tighter control over pricing and distribution can reverse the slide. But Hill warned the digital cleanup will take "multiple seasons" and will depress near-term revenue and profitability in China. Analysts are skeptical. BNP Paribas senior analyst Laurent Vasilescu has argued that Nike's real problem in China is not its distribution channels but its products, and he questioned whether the company's aggressive timeline for shutting down online wholesale will actually work. The broader question hanging over the restructuring is whether Chinese consumers will want what Nike is selling once the company gets its pricing and channels in order.
North America offered a rare bright spot. Sales in the region rose 2% on a constant-currency basis in the quarter, buoyed by Nike's performance business, which benefited from World Cup momentum. But even that silver lining has tarnished. In September, French soccer star Kylian Mbappe ended a two-decade partnership with Nike and signed with Swiss rival On—a symbolic loss that underscores how the company's grip on elite athletes is loosening.
The first-quarter numbers themselves fell short of expectations. Nike's quarterly sales dropped about 4% to $11.21 billion, missing the analyst consensus of $11.32 billion. Gross margin did improve by 60 basis points to 42.8%, helped by lower warehousing and logistics costs, but that gain masks the underlying weakness in demand. Hill said Nike would update its full-year targets in November as the restructuring unfolds.
Wall Street's confidence in the turnaround has visibly eroded. In September, S&P Dow Jones Indices removed Nike from the S&P 100 after 18 years as a blue-chip holding, part of a quarterly rebalancing that nonetheless signals a shift in how the market views the company. Analysts like Neil Saunders of GlobalData have questioned whether the restructuring plan, while sensible on its face, reveals a deeper problem: that Nike's current business model is fundamentally broken. The question now is whether Hill's fixes will arrive in time to prevent further erosion, or whether the company's challenges will persist through multiple quarters of pain.
Citas Notables
Our Nike performance business is not yet large enough to offset the pressure we're seeing in Nike sportswear, Jordan brand, and Greater China.— CEO Elliott Hill
Nike does not have a channel problem in China, but rather a product problem.— BNP Paribas senior analyst Laurent Vasilescu
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en CNBC TV18 ↗