Niels Bohr's Wartime Humanitarian Record Reexamined in Philip Ball's New Biography

Jewish scientists and Danish Jews faced persecution under Nazi occupation, and Denmark's Jews were evacuated to Sweden in 1943 to escape deportation.
Bohr kept a list of refugees and carried it abroad to find them posts
Philip Ball's biography shows Bohr quietly working to place Jewish scientists who fled Nazism.
Mark

Why does a book review still circle back to one conversation in 1941?

Mimi

Because nobody can say with certainty what was said. Frayn's play made it vivid, but the reviewer says plainly that the question of whether it reflects history is unresolved.

Mark

And Ball's contribution is a different angle on Bohr?

Mimi

Yes. He shows Bohr keeping a list of refugee Jewish scientists and carrying it abroad to find them posts. Rozenthal, Frisch, Born and Szilard all came through his institute.

Luke

Careful, though. That's the reviewer's summary of Ball. We don't have the book's own evidence here, so how many people Bohr actually placed isn't stated.

Mark

Fair. What about Heisenberg? Was he there for the bomb?

Mimi

The review says that was probably his reason for visiting, since Copenhagen was central to fission knowledge. But it also asks whether he was just a goodwill ambassador.

Luke

Note the word "probably." The motive is inference. What's documented is Heisenberg's postwar explanation and Bohr's unsent 1958 letter rejecting it, plus Meitner and others' belief that he expected a German victory.

Mark

And 1943?

Mimi

Bohr was warned through the resistance, escaped to Sweden, flew to Britain, and Duckwitz's tip helped most of Denmark's Jews cross to Sweden.

Luke

The review gives no figure for those saved, only "the vast majority." I'd leave it there.

  • Nazi occupation hangs over Denmark, and the country's Jews live under a threat that grows darker as news of mass murder seeps through.
  • Bohr carries a list of endangered colleagues across borders, scrambling to secure posts and shelter for refugees fleeing the race laws.
  • The 1941 meeting with Heisenberg remains a rupture, with Bohr later calling his old friend's self-justification an apologia for German nationalism.
  • When deportation threatens in 1943, Danish resistance, a German diplomat's warning, and a sea crossing to Sweden move the Jewish population toward safety.
  • The book's legacy lands in postwar work toward restraint on nuclear weapons and the founding of CERN as a cooperative science born from catastrophe.

In the autumn of 1941, two physicists sat together in occupied Copenhagen, and the silence and words between them have been argued over ever since. Michael Frayn's play turned that encounter into a long meditation on memory and guilt, and Philip Ball's new biography returns to it while asking what kind of man Niels Bohr truly was. What emerges is a portrait of a scientist who, under a shadow of persecution, spent himself finding refuge for those the age had marked for destruction, even as the motives of his old colleague remain a question no one has fully answered.

In 1998, Michael Frayn's play Copenhagen opened in London and drew wide acclaim. It imagined a conversation between Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg in autumn 1941, a conversation whose true content no one can recover. Philip Ball's new biography, The Man Who Broke Reality, revisits that encounter and paints Bohr above all as a humanitarian.

The meeting unfolded while Nazi Germany occupied Denmark. The Danish government refused German pressure to act against its Jewish citizens, and most Danes shunned Heisenberg during his visit, even as rumors of mass murder began to circulate. Ball stresses what Bohr did for colleagues fleeing Nazism. He kept a list of refugees, carried it on his travels, and sought posts for them, and many found their way to his institute in Copenhagen, among them Otto Frisch, Max Born and Leo Szilard.

Heisenberg's motives remain unsettled. After the war he claimed he had worked within the regime to keep the nuclear project out of Hitler's hands. Bohr, in a letter he never sent, dismissed this as little more than an apologia for German nationalism, and the review leaves open whether Heisenberg was a goodwill envoy or something more troubling.

In 1943, warnings came that Bohr himself faced deportation. That summer the Danes, aided by a German diplomat who alerted them, ferried most of the country's Jews to Sweden. Bohr escaped too, reaching Britain and later Los Alamos, where he advised younger scientists.

In his final decade he helped found CERN, a cooperative project born from the wreckage of the Holocaust and Hiroshima. The reviewer calls Ball's book perceptive and accessible, and credits it with restoring many half-forgotten scientists who faced moral choices under dictators.

In 1998, Michael Frayn's play Copenhagen opened in London to wide acclaim. It dramatized a conversation between the Danish physicist Niels Bohr and the German Werner Heisenberg in the autumn of 1941. Whether the play captured what actually happened in that room is still unresolved, and a new biography by Philip Ball, The Man Who Broke Reality, returns to the question while drawing a broader portrait of Bohr as a humanitarian.

The meeting took place while Nazi Germany occupied Denmark, a country the Nazis regarded as a model for Aryan states. The Danes, with few resources, did not resist the takeover, but their social democratic government refused German pressure to act against Danish Jews. The reviewer in The Jerusalem Post notes that most Danes ostracized Heisenberg during his visit, at a time when hints of mass murder of Jews were beginning to filter through.

Ball's account stresses what Bohr did for colleagues fleeing Nazism, especially after the race laws were introduced. Many refugees found shelter in Copenhagen before moving on. Bohr kept a list of them and carried it abroad on his travels, trying to find them posts. Among those who made their way to his institute were Stefan Rozenthal, Otto Frisch, Max Born and Leo Szilard, often with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation. A cyclotron began operating there in 1938, and the institute became a central site for the developing knowledge of nuclear fission in occupied Europe. The review suggests this was probably why Heisenberg came.

Bohr was not Jewish by religion, though his mother, Ellen, came from the Adler family, a liberal banking family descended from David Baruch Adler and Jenny Raphael, settled in Copenhagen since 1850. The family was highly assimilated and Bohr was raised Lutheran. He broke with Christianity after hearing a clergyman call the sinking of the Titanic "God's will." Nazi scientists nonetheless called him a "white Jew," accusing him of collusion in "Jewish physics."

Heisenberg's motives remain disputed. After the war he argued that he had worked within Nazi oppression to keep control of the nuclear project and keep it from Hitler. In a letter he never sent, written in 1958, Bohr called that explanation little more than an apologia for German nationalism. Lise Meitner and other Jewish scientists believed Heisenberg had then regarded a German victory as inevitable. The review asks whether he was an apolitical goodwill ambassador or was pursuing an atomic weapon, and leaves the question open.

The book also traces Bohr's scientific path: study under J. J. Thomson at the Cavendish Laboratory, then work with Ernest Rutherford at Manchester, where Chaim Weizmann had been a researcher. Bohr replaced the plum-pudding model of the atom with electrons orbiting a nucleus, each in a specific energy level, emitting a photon when jumping between "quantized" orbits. This explained the structure of the periodic table and helped predict where undiscovered elements would fit. Hafnium was named from the Latin name for Copenhagen. He and Einstein stayed friends despite disagreeing over chance in quantum processes, which Einstein resisted as a "dice-throwing God."

In early 1943, the British sent word through the Danish resistance that Bohr risked deportation to Germany. That summer, strikes and sabotage led Hitler to end the lenient treatment of Denmark, which was to be made Judenrein. The German diplomat Georg Ferdinand Duckwitz alerted the Danes, and the great majority of Denmark's Jews were ferried across the straits to Sweden. Bohr was taken there too, then flown to Britain on Churchill's orders and lodged at London's Savoy Hotel. He later went to Los Alamos under the name "Nicholas Baker" to advise younger scientists.

Neither Bohr nor Einstein helped build the bomb, though both laid its theoretical groundwork, and both tried after the war to prevent proliferation and an arms race with the Soviet Union. Bohr had also tried to help Soviet colleagues, pressing the Kremlin, without success, to let Pyotr Kapitza leave, and seeking aid for the imprisoned Lev Landau. In his last decade he was a central figure in founding CERN in Switzerland, a project of cooperation across nationalities in the wake of the Holocaust, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The reviewer calls Ball's book perceptive and accessible, and credits it with recovering many half-forgotten scientists who faced moral dilemmas under dictators.

Heisenberg's postwar explanation was little more than an apologia for German nationalism.
— Niels Bohr, in an unsent 1958 letter (as paraphrased in the review)
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Jerusalem Post ↗
Kontakt FAQ