In September 2026, Newcastle University appointed Anant Ambani — heir to India's largest oil fortune and operator of a vast private zoo under international scrutiny — as a professor of sustainability, a decision that has since become a mirror held up to the academy itself. The appointment asks an old and unresolved question: whether institutions built to interrogate power can remain credible when they begin to confer legitimacy upon it. At a moment when climate science demands the rapid unwinding of fossil fuel economies, the choice of a billionaire oil heir to represent environmental stewards
Newcastle University's sustainability professorship for oil heir sparks backlash
Universities are supposed to question power, not legitimize it
So Newcastle gave this man a professorship in sustainability. What exactly did he do to earn it?
He runs a massive private zoo called Vantara in India—1,400 hectares, over 150,000 animals. The university cited his conservation work and his role in his family's renewable energy division.
But here's the thing: a UN investigation found probable forged permits for endangered species imports to that zoo. That's a serious allegation, even if he's never been convicted.
Right. And the German newspaper investigation traced animals arriving through countries with opaque wildlife trading networks. The concerns about illegal trafficking are documented and international.
Did he respond to any of this?
Vantara and the Ambani family have denied the trafficking allegations. They say their mission is rescue and rehabilitation. They also announced a "reset" of operations and paused wildlife imports.
But that pause came after the investigations, not before. And India's supreme court cleared them in less than three weeks—which some observers found suspiciously fast.
What did other academics say?
Ramachandra Guha, a major Indian environmentalist scholar, said he could name 50 to 100 people better qualified. He questioned whether Newcastle did any due diligence.
The real tension is this: his family made its fortune in oil and gas. He works for an oil and gas company. And he's being given a sustainability professorship. That's the core contradiction.
Is that disqualifying?
That's what the critics are asking. One Sussex professor said universities are supposed to question power, not give corporate interests academic legitimacy.
El Pulso
- An oil dynasty heir worth £90 billion has been handed a sustainability professorship at a British university, a pairing that critics describe as a contradiction dressed in academic robes.
- His private zoo — 1,400 hectares housing over 150,000 animals near active oil refineries — is at the centre of a UN investigation that found probable forged permits for endangered species imports.
- Prominent scholars and wildlife investigators are openly questioning whether Newcastle conducted any meaningful due diligence, with one researcher asking simply: 'Is this a joke?'
- Staff unions and sustainability academics warn that declining public funding is making universities dangerously susceptible to billionaire influence, trading intellectual independence for financial survival.
- Vantara has announced an operational reset and voluntarily paused wildlife imports, but the reputational damage to both the zoo and the university continues to deepen.
- Newcastle has defended the appointment on conservation grounds while declining to address the trafficking allegations, the forged permits, or the fossil fuel contradiction at the heart of the controversy.
In September 2026, Newcastle University appointed Anant Ambani — heir to India's largest oil fortune and operator of a vast private zoo under international scrutiny — as a professor of sustainability, a decision that has since become a mirror held up to the academy itself. The appointment asks an old and unresolved question: whether institutions built to interrogate power can remain credible when they begin to confer legitimacy upon it. At a moment when climate science demands the rapid unwinding of fossil fuel economies, the choice of a billionaire oil heir to represent environmental stewardship has unsettled conservationists, academics, and wildlife investigators across two continents.
When Newcastle University announced in September that it had appointed Anant Ambani as a professor of practice in sustainability, the reaction from the conservation and academic communities was swift and pointed. Ambani, 31, is the son of India's richest person and heir to the Reliance conglomerate, whose wealth is rooted in fossil fuels and includes the world's largest oil refinery. His own role leading Reliance's renewable energy transition already placed him in complicated territory. But it was Vantara — his 1,400-hectare private zoo in Gujarat, housing more than 150,000 animals including hundreds of lions, leopards, and crocodiles — that drew the sharpest scrutiny.
Investigations by the German press and a Cites fact-finding mission raised serious concerns about how so many endangered animals had been sourced, with the UN body finding that some import permits were probably forged. Vantara has never been found legally culpable — an Indian supreme court inquiry cleared its operators — and the Ambani family has consistently denied any wrongdoing. In August, the zoo announced a voluntary pause on wildlife imports and brought in a former Cites head to oversee its procedures.
The backlash, however, extended well beyond the zoo's record. Ramachandra Guha, one of India's foremost public intellectuals, said he could name dozens of soil scientists, ecologists, and community conservationists far better qualified for such recognition, and questioned whether Newcastle had done its homework. Wildlife investigator Bhuvan Mangalore, who is completing a dissertation on Vantara, was more blunt in his disbelief.
Deeper institutional anxieties surfaced alongside the specific objections. Academics at Sussex and union representatives at Newcastle warned that as public funding erodes, universities face growing pressure to accept billionaire and corporate money — and with it, the risk of allowing those donors to shape academic priorities and acquire scholarly credibility. Newcastle defended the appointment on conservation grounds but did not engage with the trafficking concerns or the apparent tension between its stated mission and the fossil fuel origins of its new professor's fortune. The episode has become a pointed test of whether universities can hold power to account when they are increasingly dependent on it.
Newcastle University announced in September that it had appointed Anant Ambani as a professor of practice, citing his work in conservation, biodiversity protection, animal welfare, and environmental stewardship. The appointment landed like a stone in still water. Within days, conservationists, academics, and environmental investigators began asking the same question: how did the heir to an Indian oil and gas fortune—a man worth an estimated £90 billion whose family made its wealth primarily in fossil fuels—end up holding a sustainability professorship at a British university?
Ambani, 31, is the son of Mukesh Ambani, India's richest person and owner of the world's largest oil refinery through his Reliance conglomerate. The younger Ambani serves as executive lead for the group's renewable energy transition, a role that sits in obvious tension with his family's core business. But the real source of the backlash was not his lineage or his employer. It was Vantara, the 1,400-hectare private zoo he runs near the family's refining facilities in Gujarat. The facility houses more than 150,000 animals, including 200 lions, 250 leopards, and 900 crocodiles. Ambani hosted his lavish pre-wedding celebrations there in 2024, an event attended by celebrities and politicians, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The zoo's origins raised immediate red flags among wildlife experts. In 2025, an investigation by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung found that many animals delivered to Vantara had arrived through countries with opaque wildlife trading networks, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the United Arab Emirates. Conservation groups questioned how so many endangered species had been sourced. A fact-finding mission by Cites, the UN body regulating trade in endangered species, discovered that some of the permits used to import animals to Vantara were probably forged. The Cites report warned that large-scale animal imports by facilities like Vantara could be creating demand for illegally sourced animals. Vantara has never been found guilty of wrongdoing. An investigation by India's supreme court, completed in less than three weeks in August of the previous year, cleared the zoo's operators. The Ambani family has consistently denied trafficking allegations, stating that their mission remains the rescue, rehabilitation, and care of animals. In August, Vantara announced a "reset" of its operations, appointing a former Cites head to oversee procedures and voluntarily pausing all wildlife imports until June of the following year.
Ramachandra Guha, a leading Indian public intellectual and author of Speaking With Nature: The Origins of Indian Environmentalism, responded to the appointment with bewilderment. He said he could name at least 50, perhaps 100, individuals far better qualified for such an honor—soil scientists, energy scientists, water conservation experts, community forest workers, ecologists, and pollution abatement experts who had made tangible contributions to sustainability in India. Guha questioned whether Newcastle had conducted proper due diligence and warned that the appointment was likely to damage the university's institutional credibility and intellectual standing. Bhuvan Mangalore, an Indian investigator into illegal wildlife trade completing a dissertation on Vantara at Anglia Ruskin University, simply asked: "Is this a joke?"
The objections extended beyond India. Matt Perry, chair of the University and College Union branch at Newcastle, said staff members had raised environmental concerns about the appointment. Lyla Mehta, head of the climate, environment and sustainability department at the University of Sussex's Institute of Development Studies, flagged a deeper institutional worry: as public funding for universities declined, there was real danger that billionaire and corporate money would begin shaping academic priorities. "Universities are supposed to be places that question power and hold corporations to account, not give them academic legitimacy," she said. Lorne Stockman, a research co-director at Oil Change International, added that at a moment when the climate crisis demanded an urgent phase-out of oil and gas, publicly funded institutions needed to do better.
Newcastle University defended the appointment through a spokesperson, saying the professorship of practice recognized Ambani's contributions to conservation and biodiversity protection through Vantara and his role leading Reliance's green energy transition. The university did not address the specific concerns about wildlife trafficking, the forged permits, or the apparent contradiction between appointing a sustainability professor from an oil and gas dynasty at a moment when the world's leading climate scientists are calling for the rapid abandonment of fossil fuels. The appointment stands as a test case for how universities navigate the tension between financial need and intellectual independence—and whether accepting money and prestige from billionaires can coexist with the institution's stated mission to question power.
Citas Notables
I can name at least 50—perhaps 100—individuals who are far better qualified to be thus honoured. Its appointment of Mr Ambani is puzzling in the extreme, and is likely to adversely affect the university's institutional credibility and intellectual standing.— Ramachandra Guha, Indian public intellectual and environmentalism scholar
Universities are supposed to be places that question power and hold corporations to account, not give them academic legitimacy.— Lyla Mehta, head of climate, environment and sustainability department at University of Sussex