New Studies Find No Clear Link Between Metformin Use Before or Early in Pregnancy and Major Birth Defects

The disease, not the drug, may explain the earlier warning signs.
Researchers say diabetes and related conditions may account for risk seen in earlier metformin studies.
Mark

So what's the headline here? Metformin got cleared?

Mimi

Not cleared so much as unlinked. Two large analyses found no clear added risk of major birth defects once other health factors were accounted for.

Mark

But the raw numbers in the father study looked worse for metformin.

Mimi

Yes, 6.2% against 4.7%. Then the researchers adjusted for the fathers' other conditions and the mothers' diabetes, and the gap went away.

Luke

That adjustment carries the whole conclusion, though. It's an observational analysis, so it can't prove the drug is harmless, only that the excess risk isn't visible after those corrections.

Mark

And the combination therapy result?

Mimi

Modestly elevated risk with metformin plus another drug. Rotem's explanation is that those fathers had worse-controlled diabetes.

Luke

That's his interpretation. The reporting doesn't show it's proven, and the editorial itself says these studies lack glycemic control data.

Mark

What about the mothers?

Mimi

Metformin plus insulin came in around 6% versus 8% for insulin alone, so continuing it looked no worse, perhaps slightly better.

Luke

Worth noting the lead author's explanation about blood sugar control is a hypothesis. And the paternal study didn't measure how long men took the drug.

Mimi

Which is why the editorial says individual risks and benefits need careful weighing, even while suggesting guidelines favoring insulin switches may deserve a second look.

  • Two new studies challenge a 2022 finding that paternal metformin use raised birth defect risk by 40 percent, unsettling families already navigating diabetes and pregnancy plans.
  • Researchers suspect the earlier alarm was driven by underlying diabetes and related conditions in both parents rather than by the medicine itself.
  • A modest rise in risk appeared only when fathers combined metformin with another diabetes drug, pointing toward poorly controlled blood sugar as the likely culprit.
  • Experts are calling for prenatal guidelines that often steer patients toward insulin to be reexamined, while still urging lifestyle changes and noting gaps in glycemic control data.

In a season when many parents-to-be quietly weigh every pill against the fragile hope of a healthy child, two new studies have offered a measure of relief. Published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, they suggest that metformin, the long-trusted diabetes medicine, does not clearly raise the risk of major birth defects whether a father takes it before conception or a mother takes it in early pregnancy. The findings gently revise an earlier and more alarming signal, reminding us that the diseases we treat often carry their own shadows, and that the drug and the illness are not always the same thing.

Parents managing type 2 diabetes have long carried a particular worry: does metformin, the drug so many of them rely on, put a future child at risk of a major birth defect? Two studies published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine, both from researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, suggest it does not, whether fathers take it before conception or mothers take it in early pregnancy. Their conclusions run against a 2022 study that linked paternal use to a 40 percent higher risk.

The paternal study drew on records for nearly 400,000 babies born in Israel between 1999 and 2020. At first glance, children of fathers taking metformin had higher rates of birth defects, 6.2 percent compared with 4.7 percent. But the men on the drug were older, sicker, more likely to smoke and more likely to face fertility problems, and their partners shared many of those burdens. Once those factors were accounted for, the extra risk vanished. Dr. Ran Rotem, an author of the study, argued that the disease itself, not the drug, was the likelier source of the earlier signal. One wrinkle remained: fathers on metformin plus another diabetes drug showed a modest increase, which Rotem attributed to poorer diabetes control rather than the pills themselves.

The maternal study, using US Medicaid data on more than 12,000 women with type 2 diabetes, found little added risk when women kept metformin and added insulin in the first trimester, with rates of about 6 percent compared with 8 percent for insulin alone. Dr. Yu-Han Chiu noted that metformin may cross the placenta, yet it helps keep blood sugar steady, and poor control is itself a known danger.

Outside experts were cautiously receptive. Dr. Meleen Chuang of NYU Langone said she would not change how she prescribes metformin to couples trying to conceive, while still encouraging healthy weight, diet, exercise and abstaining from smoking, alcohol and drugs. Dr. Sarah Martins da Silva, writing an accompanying editorial, judged the evidence clearer and metformin safe and effective, while noting the studies lack data on glycemic control. She suggested it may be time to revisit guidelines that favor switching to insulin.

Two studies published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine take on a question that has worried parents managing type 2 diabetes: does metformin, the drug so many of them take, raise the chance of a baby being born with a major birth defect? Both papers, from researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, conclude that it does not appear to, whether the drug is taken by fathers before conception or by mothers in early pregnancy.

The findings cut against a 2022 study that tied metformin use by men in the three months before conception to a 40% higher risk of birth defects in their children. Metformin has been used to control blood sugar since the 1960s. It is a first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes and the most commonly prescribed oral drug for the condition. People are advised to tell their doctor before starting it if they plan to become pregnant, are pregnant or are breastfeeding.

The paternal study was done with the Kahn-Sagol-Maccabi Research and Innovation Center of Maccabi Healthcare Services in Israel. It analyzed birth and medical records for nearly 400,000 babies born in Israel from 1999 to 2020, and matched them with information on the fathers: age, laboratory results and medication records, including metformin prescriptions. Major birth defects appeared in 4.7% of children whose fathers had taken no diabetes medication in the months before conception, and in 6.2% of children whose fathers had taken metformin. But once the researchers adjusted for the fathers' other health conditions and for whether the mothers also had diabetes or related problems, the extra risk disappeared.

The groups were not alike to begin with. Men on diabetes medication during the sperm development period were older, had more underlying health conditions, were more likely to have fertility problems and were more likely to have a history of smoking. Their partners also had more health conditions and fertility problems. As Dr. Ran Rotem, an author of the study, put it, when a father is on diabetes medication the mother is much more likely to be on it too, or to have other metabolic problems. He argued that earlier risk signals may reflect the disease and its comorbidities rather than the drug. The study did not specifically examine how long the men had taken metformin, though Rotem said many had been on it for a long time and their results were consistent.

There was one wrinkle. Risk was modestly elevated among children of fathers who took metformin together with another diabetes drug, though metformin alone showed no such increase. Rotem noted that fathers on multiple medications had more poorly controlled diabetes, which suggests to him that their worse cardiometabolic health, not the drugs, drove the difference. His message for fathers planning a family is that they can continue metformin. If lifestyle changes alone can manage diabetes, he said, that is helpful, but if medication is needed, metformin looks like a safe choice.

The second study looked at mothers. Researchers drew on US Medicaid data from 2000 to 2018, covering more than 12,000 women with type 2 diabetes. Women who kept taking metformin and added insulin in the first trimester showed little to no added risk of a baby with major birth defects compared with women who stopped metformin and switched to insulin. The estimated risk was about 6% with insulin plus metformin and 8% with insulin alone. Lead author Dr. Yu-Han Chiu said the team was not surprised: metformin may cross the placenta, but it can help blood sugar control, and poor control is itself a risk factor for birth defects.

Outside experts were receptive. Dr. Meleen Chuang of NYU Langone, who was not involved, called the studies well done and said she would not change how metformin is prescribed to parents trying to conceive. She would still urge both parents to work on weight, diet, exercise, and on cutting smoking, alcohol and substance use. In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Sarah Martins da Silva of the University of Dundee called the picture complex but clearer, and cautioned that the studies lack data on glycemic control. She nonetheless wrote that metformin appears safe and effective for men and women trying to conceive and for pregnant women in the first trimester, and that it may be time to reconsider guidelines advising a switch to insulin.

Paternal use of metformin in the sperm development period is not associated with excess risk of malformation in newborns.
— Dr. Ran Rotem, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Results should be interpreted with caution since studies lack information on glycemic control.
— Dr. Sarah Martins da Silva, University of Dundee
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Cable News Network ↗
Kontakt FAQ