In the long shadow of October 7, Benjamin Netanyahu made a quiet journey to Abu Dhabi — a trip both governments confirmed only after Israeli media had already named it. At its surface, the visit was framed as diplomacy between two nations bound by the Abraham Accords; beneath it lay a far more consequential question: whether a warning of the Hamas attack had been given, received, and then buried. The meeting reminds us that in the space between what leaders know and what they choose to act upon, history is often made — and unmade.
Netanyahu's Secret UAE Visit Amid Allegations Over 2023 Hamas Warning
Over 70,000 Palestinians have been killed in the Gaza war, many of them civilians.
Netanyahu is widely viewed as the chief architect of the Gaza war
Mark
So Netanyahu flew to Abu Dhabi in secret. Why does that matter if both governments just say they talked about strengthening ties?
Mimi
Because Channel 12 reported he went there to ask the UAE president to deny he'd warned Israel about Hamas before October 7. If that's true, it suggests Netanyahu is trying to manage a story that could damage him politically.
Luke
But we should be clear: Netanyahu's office denies he made any such request. We have one broadcaster's reporting against an official denial. That's the actual state of what we know.
Mark
And the original warning—did that actually happen?
Mimi
The UAE president apparently did warn Netanyahu. But Netanyahu allegedly didn't pass it to Israeli security services. That's what Channel 12 reported, and Netanyahu's office denied that too.
Luke
Right. So we have a claim about a warning, a claim that Netanyahu suppressed it, and now a claim that he went to Abu Dhabi to get the UAE to recant. Each layer is contested by Netanyahu's side.
Mark
Why would the Shin Bet file a complaint against the broadcaster for reporting the trip?
Mimi
They said it endangered Netanyahu's life—his plane was still in the air when the story broke. But it also looks like damage control, trying to discredit the outlet that's reporting the uncomfortable parts of the story.
Luke
That's fair, but the security concern is real too. Reporting a leader's location before they're home is genuinely risky. Both things can be true.
Mark
What does this say about Israel and the UAE?
Mimi
They have official ties under the Abraham Accords, but they're strained by Gaza. The UAE condemned the October 7 attack but has also criticized Israeli actions in Gaza. This meeting shows they're still talking, but carefully.
Luke
And Netanyahu is politically isolated in the region right now. Most Arab governments see him as driving the Gaza war. The UAE meeting him at all is significant—but also risky for the UAE's standing.
Mark
So what happens next?
Mimi
That depends on whether more reporting surfaces about what was actually discussed, and whether the Shin Bet's complaint against Channel 12 succeeds in silencing further coverage.
Luke
And whether the original claim about the warning ever gets independently verified. Right now it's one broadcaster's account against official denials.
El Pulso
- Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi while his government stayed silent, and it was Israeli media — not his office — that told the world he had gone.
- The core allegation is damning: that UAE President Sheikh Mohamed had warned Netanyahu of an imminent Hamas threat before October 7, and that Netanyahu never passed it to Israeli security services.
- Israel's Shin Bet filed a censorship complaint against Channel 12 for reporting the trip while Netanyahu's plane was still airborne, signaling how fiercely the government wanted to control the story.
- Netanyahu's office denied both the original warning claim and the suggestion that the Abu Dhabi trip was meant to persuade the UAE to retract it — Channel 12 says otherwise, and neither side is backing down.
- The visit lands in a relationship already under strain: the UAE and Israel are formal allies under the Abraham Accords, yet Abu Dhabi has condemned the Gaza war's scale as over 70,000 Palestinians have been killed.
In the long shadow of October 7, Benjamin Netanyahu made a quiet journey to Abu Dhabi — a trip both governments confirmed only after Israeli media had already named it. At its surface, the visit was framed as diplomacy between two nations bound by the Abraham Accords; beneath it lay a far more consequential question: whether a warning of the Hamas attack had been given, received, and then buried. The meeting reminds us that in the space between what leaders know and what they choose to act upon, history is often made — and unmade.
Benjamin Netanyahu arrived in Abu Dhabi on Sunday for a meeting with UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan — a visit both governments confirmed only after Israeli media had already reported it. The official language from both sides was measured: bilateral ties, regional challenges, shared interests. What it did not address was the reason Channel 12 said Netanyahu had actually made the trip: to persuade the Emirati leader to deny that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an imminent Hamas attack in the weeks before October 7, 2023.
The allegation is serious. According to Channel 12's reporting, Sheikh Mohamed had alerted Netanyahu to the threat, but Netanyahu never relayed it to Israeli security services. The October 7 attack killed hundreds of Israelis and set off a war in Gaza that has now taken more than 70,000 Palestinian lives. If advance warning had been given and ignored, the political consequences for Netanyahu would be severe. His office denied both the original claim and any suggestion that the Abu Dhabi visit was meant to suppress it.
The secrecy of the trip became its own controversy. Before either government had confirmed Netanyahu's whereabouts, Israel's Shin Bet filed a complaint against Channel 12 for violating censorship rules — arguing the broadcaster had published its report while the prime minister, his wife, and a delegation that included the Mossad chief were still in the air. Netanyahu's office called for prosecution. The complaint revealed just how much the government wanted to shape what the public knew, and when.
The visit came at a complicated moment in Israel-UAE relations. The two countries are formal partners under the 2020 Abraham Accords, but the Gaza war has introduced real friction. The UAE condemned the October 7 attack and expressed alarm at the hostage-taking, yet it has also denounced what it describes as ongoing Israeli violations in Gaza. The relationship has had moments of genuine cooperation — Israel reportedly deployed Iron Dome systems to help protect the UAE during Iranian retaliatory strikes — but Netanyahu remains a polarizing figure across the Arab world, and the meeting carried political risk for Abu Dhabi.
This was not Netanyahu's first reported secret visit to the UAE. A previous trip in May was denied at the time; this one marked the first official confirmation of a meeting between the two leaders. What was said in that room, however — whether Netanyahu asked Sheikh Mohamed to walk back his account of the pre-October 7 warning — remained disputed and unconfirmed. Netanyahu's office said no. Channel 12 said yes. The door to that conversation, for now, remains closed.
Benjamin Netanyahu slipped into Abu Dhabi on Sunday for a meeting with UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Both governments confirmed the visit late Monday, offering carefully neutral language about strengthening bilateral ties and addressing regional challenges. What neither side acknowledged directly was the reason Israeli media outlets were reporting the prime minister had actually gone there: to persuade the Emirati leader to recant a claim that he had warned Netanyahu of an imminent Hamas attack weeks before October 7, 2023.
The allegation, first reported by Israeli broadcaster Channel 12, carried serious weight. According to the reporting, Sheikh Mohamed had alerted Netanyahu to the threat posed by Hamas, but the Israeli premier had failed to pass that warning along to his country's security services. The October 7 attack killed hundreds of Israelis and triggered a war in Gaza that has now claimed over 70,000 Palestinian lives, many of them civilians. If the UAE president had indeed provided advance notice and Netanyahu had ignored or suppressed it, the implications for the prime minister's leadership were severe. His office moved quickly to deny both the original claim and the suggestion that he had traveled to Abu Dhabi to bury it.
The secrecy surrounding the trip itself became a flashpoint. Before the governments had even confirmed Netanyahu's visit, Israel's domestic security service, the Shin Bet, filed a complaint against Channel 12 for breaching censorship rules. The broadcaster had published its report while Netanyahu's plane was still outside Israeli airspace, the security service argued, putting the prime minister, his wife, and a delegation that included the head of the Mossad spy agency at risk. Netanyahu's office demanded the broadcaster be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The complaint underscored how sensitive the visit was—and how much the government wanted to control the narrative around it.
The meeting itself represented a delicate moment in Israel-UAE relations. The two countries maintain official diplomatic ties under the Abraham Accords, signed during Donald Trump's first term in 2020, making the UAE one of only a handful of Arab nations with formal relations to Israel. Yet those ties have grown strained. The UAE condemned the October 7 attack as a grave escalation and expressed horror at the taking of Israeli hostages. But it has also denounced what it calls ongoing Israeli violations in Gaza, reflecting the deep discomfort many Arab governments feel with the war's scale and its civilian toll.
The relationship has not been purely adversarial. During Israel's conflict with Iran, the UAE faced retaliatory attacks from Tehran, and Israel reportedly deployed Iron Dome air defense systems and personnel to help protect the Gulf state. Still, Netanyahu is widely viewed across the Middle East as the chief architect of the Gaza war, making his visit to Abu Dhabi a significant diplomatic move at a moment when such engagement carries political risk for the UAE.
This was not Netanyahu's first attempt at a secret meeting with the Emirati leadership. In May, reports surfaced of a previous trip to the UAE, which the government had denied at the time. The acknowledgment of this latest visit marked a shift—the first time the UAE had officially confirmed a meeting between the two leaders. What remained unconfirmed, and hotly disputed, was whether Netanyahu had used the opportunity to ask Sheikh Mohamed to walk back his account of the pre-October 7 warning. Netanyahu's office said no. Channel 12 said yes. The truth of what was discussed in that room in Abu Dhabi remained, for now, behind closed doors.
Citas Notables
Netanyahu's office said the visit focused on strengthening relations between the two countries and on regional challenges— Netanyahu's office statement
The UAE condemned the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023 as a serious and grave escalation but has also denounced ongoing Israeli violations in Gaza— UAE government position
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en Deutsche Welle ↗