A president, under the pressure of a long and bitter conflict, has stepped back from the edge of new strikes and offered the world a glimpse of a possible settlement with Tehran. Yet the one ally most affected by the choice learned of it only when everyone else did, and its carefully worded reply suggests that the gap between Washington and Jerusalem is as much about how peace is pursued as about whether it is desirable. Whether this pause becomes a durable turn or a brief interlude will depend on a regime that has not yet confirmed what its counterpart claims.
Netanyahu Reportedly Blindsided as Trump Halts Iran Strikes and Pushes Surprise Diplomatic Deal
"I call the shots. He doesn't call the shots."
Strip away the headline. What actually happened here?
Trump called off planned strikes on Iran and said a deal could come within days. Reports say Netanyahu wasn't warned and found out when the announcement went public.
What's in the framework Trump described?
A ceasefire extension, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and a new round of nuclear talks. Trump also claimed Iran agreed never to pursue nuclear weapons.
Careful there. That claim is Trump's. Iran hasn't confirmed it, and spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said no final decision has been made.
So the deal itself is unconfirmed?
Yes. Baghaei called reports of a completed deal speculation, and accused Washington of shifting its positions. Qatar and Pakistan are still mediating.
The Netanyahu part is also built on reports and unnamed sources. We have Israel's official statement, which welcomed the goals but didn't endorse the process. That's on the record. The blindsiding is attributed.
Why does the Israeli statement's wording matter?
It lists demands: removal of enriched material, dismantled enrichment infrastructure, missile limits, an end to proxy support. That's a bar the deal has to clear, without saying Israel backs the talks.
And Trump's "I call the shots" line?
That one is a direct quote from an interview, so it's solid. What's unknown is how Netanyahu will respond, and whether the memorandum in Europe materializes at all.
Le Pouls
- Trump called off planned strikes on Iran and announced a framework that could finalise a deal within days.
- Netanyahu reportedly learned of the pause only after it became public, stirring alarm in Jerusalem.
- The Prime Minister's Office welcomed the goals but refused to endorse the diplomatic process, setting out tough nuclear and missile demands.
- Tehran calls the deal speculation and says no final decision has been made, while Qatar and Pakistan keep mediating.
- A memorandum could be signed in Europe with Vice President Vance leading the delegation, but Iran's approval remains unconfirmed.
A president, under the pressure of a long and bitter conflict, has stepped back from the edge of new strikes and offered the world a glimpse of a possible settlement with Tehran. Yet the one ally most affected by the choice learned of it only when everyone else did, and its carefully worded reply suggests that the gap between Washington and Jerusalem is as much about how peace is pursued as about whether it is desirable. Whether this pause becomes a durable turn or a brief interlude will depend on a regime that has not yet confirmed what its counterpart claims.
President Donald Trump cancelled planned military strikes on Iran and told the world that a diplomatic agreement could be finalised within days. Reports suggest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not told beforehand and only learned of the decision once it was public.
Trump announced the pause on Truth Social, saying Iran's leadership had signalled approval of a framework for renewed talks. It reportedly covers a ceasefire extension, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and new nuclear negotiations. He later claimed the United States had effectively ended the war and that Tehran had agreed never to pursue nuclear weapons.
Israel's apparent exclusion has drawn the most attention. Its Prime Minister's Office thanked Trump for insisting that any final deal cover the nuclear programme, missiles and proxy groups, but stopped short of backing the process. Israel expects removal of enriched material, dismantling of enrichment sites, missile limits and an end to support for militants. Netanyahu had reportedly urged Trump to strike rather than pause, arguing that Iran uses talks to buy time.
The rift follows months of friction over Israeli operations in Lebanon, which Trump reportedly saw as complicating wider diplomacy. Both leaders still publicly describe each other as close allies. Iran, for its part, calls reports of a completed deal speculation and insists it has made no final decision, while accusing Washington of shifting its positions.
President Donald Trump cancelled planned military strikes on Iran and then told the world that a diplomatic agreement with Tehran could be finalised within days. According to reports, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not told beforehand. He learned of the decision only once it was public.
Trump announced the pause in a post on Truth Social. He said talks with Tehran had reached the highest levels of Iran's leadership, and that he had received indications Iran's leaders had approved a framework for renewed negotiations. That, he said, was why he called off the operation. The framework reportedly has three parts: an extension of the ceasefire, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and a new round of talks on Iran's nuclear programme.
Trump went further afterward. He declared that the United States had effectively "ended the war with Iran" and claimed Tehran had agreed never to develop, acquire or pursue nuclear weapons.
Israel's apparent exclusion is the part of the story that has drawn the most attention. Israel is among Washington's closest allies and one of the strongest advocates of keeping military pressure on Iran. Sources familiar with the matter said Israeli officials were caught off guard as word of the proposed agreement spread.
The Prime Minister's Office responded with a carefully worded statement. It expressed appreciation for Trump's commitment to making sure any final deal covers Iran's nuclear programme, its missile capabilities and its support for regional proxy groups. It did not endorse the diplomatic process itself. It said Israel expects any eventual agreement to require removal of enriched nuclear material, dismantling of enrichment infrastructure, limits on missile production and an end to Tehran's backing of militant organisations in the region.
The position is consistent with Netanyahu's stance over recent months. He has argued that Iran uses negotiations to buy time while it strengthens its military and regional influence. Israeli officials have maintained that sustained military pressure is the best way to extract real concessions. Reports say Netanyahu personally urged Trump to go ahead with the strikes rather than pause for diplomacy, and warned in recent discussions that Iran was engaged in diplomatic "foot-dragging" and could not be trusted.
The episode follows other signs of strain between the two leaders. Israel's military operations in Lebanon have been a major source of friction. Trump reportedly grew frustrated that Israeli action against Hezbollah was complicating wider diplomatic efforts involving Iran and several Gulf states. Those disagreements reportedly led to heated exchanges, and Trump later acknowledged he had been irritated by Israel's continued campaigns. Both leaders still publicly call each other close allies and have played down the disputes.
Trump made his own position plain in a recent interview, when he dismissed the idea that Netanyahu could derail a US-Iran deal. "He won't have any choice. I call the shots. He doesn't call the shots," he said.
Iran has not confirmed any breakthrough. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei called reports of a completed deal speculation and said Iran had made no final decision. He acknowledged that mediation involving Qatar and Pakistan continues, but accused Washington of repeatedly changing its negotiating positions. Iran, he said, will not compromise on what it regards as its core national interests and red lines.
Trump has indicated that a memorandum of understanding could be signed in Europe within days, with Vice President JD Vance expected to lead the American delegation. Whether that happens depends on a framework Iran has not formally endorsed and on a process Israel openly doubts.
Citations marquantes
He won't have any choice. I call the shots. He doesn't call the shots.— Donald Trump, in a recent interview
Reports of a completed deal are speculation; Iran has made no final decision.— Esmail Baghaei, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson (paraphrased)