A month after catastrophic floods reshaped Nepal's northern valleys, the survivors who remain — many of them women, children, and the pregnant — find themselves caught between the disaster that displaced them and the inadequate systems meant to shelter them. In Nuwakot and neighboring districts, makeshift tents without sanitation, lighting, or privacy have become the daily reality for hundreds of families, while aid organizations warn that such conditions are not merely uncomfortable but dangerous. The absence of protection infrastructure in displacement camps is a familiar chapter in the huma
Nepal's flood survivors struggle for safe shelter as trafficking risks mount
A stable place to stay, where I could cook my own meals, feel safe
So a month has passed since the floods. Why are people still in tents?
Reconstruction takes time. The damage is enormous—$4.8 billion in costs. Many families have found rented rooms, but hundreds are still in temporary shelters because there simply isn't enough housing yet.
Do we know how many hundreds? The reporting says "hundreds" but doesn't give a number.
Fair point. The source doesn't quantify it precisely. We know 541 children have lost parents or been separated, and 14,000 children's schooling has been disrupted across 62 schools, but the exact number of people still in temporary shelters isn't stated.
What makes these shelters dangerous specifically?
They lack privacy and basic facilities. Women and girls have to bathe in open spaces among strangers. There's no separation between families. Unfamiliar people have unrestricted access to shared spaces at all hours.
Has anyone actually been trafficked or abused in these shelters?
The reporting says at least seven people spoke to DW, and none reported experiencing sexual harassment or abuse. But Save the Children is warning that the conditions create risk—they're not documenting cases that have already happened.
So it's a prevention concern, not a crisis that's already unfolding?
Exactly. The organization is saying: these conditions are vulnerable to exploitation. We need to strengthen protections now, before trafficking happens. They've documented mental health issues in children, school dropouts, and concerns about child marriage, but the trafficking piece is about risk, not confirmed incidents.
What is the government actually doing versus what are they saying they're doing?
They've increased monitoring at displacement sites, discouraged informal child placements, and taken 78 children out of monasteries. Those are concrete actions. Whether the monitoring is adequate or whether it's preventing actual trafficking—that's not measured in the reporting.
What does Karishma need right now?
A stable place to stay where she can cook, bathe in private, and sleep without water dripping on her. She's pregnant, caring for a 4-year-old, and her brother is still missing. The tent is not enough.
O Pulso
- One month after the August 26 floods killed roughly 1,450 people and left over 5,500 missing, hundreds of displaced women and children are still living in leaking tents with no functioning toilets or private spaces.
- Pregnant women and mothers who lost children are forced to bathe in the open among strangers — a daily exposure that humanitarian workers describe not as inconvenience but as structural danger.
- Save the Children Nepal warns that unplanned shelters with unrestricted access are actively enabling trafficking, sexual exploitation, child marriage, and mental health collapse among the displaced.
- At least 541 children have been separated from or orphaned by the disaster, with older siblings assuming caregiver roles and some children already being pulled toward informal arrangements that bypass legal protections.
- The Nepali government has begun monitoring displacement sites, retrieved 78 children from informal religious placements, and is raising awareness about trafficking — but hundreds remain in conditions where protection systems are still being assembled.
A month after catastrophic floods reshaped Nepal's northern valleys, the survivors who remain — many of them women, children, and the pregnant — find themselves caught between the disaster that displaced them and the inadequate systems meant to shelter them. In Nuwakot and neighboring districts, makeshift tents without sanitation, lighting, or privacy have become the daily reality for hundreds of families, while aid organizations warn that such conditions are not merely uncomfortable but dangerous. The absence of protection infrastructure in displacement camps is a familiar chapter in the human story of disaster: the flood recedes, but the vulnerability it creates lingers, often invisibly, in the lives of those least able to defend themselves.
A month after glacier meltwater and debris tore through Nepal's northern river valleys, Karishma Tamang — 26, pregnant, and caring for a 4-year-old daughter — is still sleeping in a tent that leaks when it rains. Her brother and his two children remain among the more than 5,500 unaccounted for. The August 26 floods killed approximately 1,450 people and left a reconstruction bill estimated at $4.8 billion. For Karishma, the numbers are distant. What is immediate is the absence of a private toilet, the need to bathe in the open among strangers, and the wish for a roof that holds.
She is not alone. Sabita Tamang, 24, lost her daughter, nephew, and niece in the same floods and lives under the same conditions in the Barahachaur area. Their discomfort is not merely about modesty — it is about exposure. Save the Children Nepal has raised urgent concerns about displacement camps built without planning: no lighting at night, no separate washrooms, no restricted access. Advocacy director Ayush Joshi explained that field assessments found children becoming frightened and angry, dropping out of school, and in some cases being pushed toward child marriage. When families fracture and protection systems are absent, older siblings become caregivers and vulnerability compounds.
The Nepali government has responded by increasing monitoring at displacement sites, mobilizing stakeholders to watch entry and exit points, and retrieving at least 78 children from Buddhist monasteries in Kathmandu that had offered informal shelter. Officials have discouraged all placements outside legal procedures, permitting children to stay only with verified close relatives. UNICEF reports that 541 children have lost parents or been separated from families, and learning has been disrupted for more than 14,000 children across three districts. Hundreds of families have found rented rooms, but hundreds more remain in tents — waiting for the stable, private, dignified shelter that has not yet arrived.
A month after the glacier collapse that sent water and debris through Nepal's northern river valleys, Karishma Tamang is still looking for a place where she can sleep through the night without water dripping onto her face. She is 26, pregnant with her second child, and has spent the past weeks moving between shelters with her 4-year-old daughter. The August 26 flood killed roughly 1,450 people and left more than 5,500 unaccounted for. The reconstruction bill is estimated at $4.8 billion. For Karishma, the numbers are abstract. What matters is that her brother and his two children remain missing, and she is living in a tent that leaks when it rains.
In the first days after the disaster, she and hundreds of others were crowded into a covered hall at Bidur Municipality in Nuwakot District. There was no privacy, no separation between families, no space to breathe. She has since moved to a makeshift tent in the Barahachaur area, a small improvement that is still not enough. There is no proper toilet—only a small latrine set up nearby. When she needs to bathe or collect water, she must walk beyond the nearest tap. She does this in the open, among strangers and people she does not know. "It would be great to have a stable place to stay, where I could cook my own meals, feel safe and have some comfort," she told reporters.
Karishma is not alone in this struggle. Sabita Tamang, 24 years old, lost her 5-year-old daughter, nephew and niece in the same floods. She too is living in a makeshift tent in Barahachaur, and she too must bathe in open spaces. The discomfort is not merely about modesty. It is about vulnerability. Save the Children Nepal has raised alarms about what happens when women and girls are forced to use shared facilities with unrestricted access—when strangers can move freely through displacement camps at any hour. The organization warns that such conditions naturally increase the risk of harassment, exploitation, and trafficking.
The shelters themselves were built without planning. Many sit on the outskirts of towns with inadequate lighting at night. There are no separate washrooms. There are no private spaces. Ayush Joshi, director for advocacy at Save the Children Nepal, explained to reporters that the organization's concerns are based on qualitative assessments conducted with affected people, including women, children, and volunteers deployed in the flood zones. "Such situations naturally increase the risk of insecurity, potential harassment and exploitation, especially for young girls and children," he said. The organization's field assessment found that many children are experiencing mental health crises—becoming angry, frightened, crying loudly. Some are dropping out of school. Some are being pushed toward child marriage. Joshi noted that in the aftermath of the disaster, many children became separated from their families, and older siblings had to assume the role of caregiver. In such circumstances, protection systems collapse.
The Nepali government has acknowledged the risks. The Ministry of Women, Children, Gender and Sexual Minorities has increased monitoring and surveillance at displacement sites and is raising awareness about gender-based violence and trafficking. Officials have mobilized stakeholders to check entry and exit points to prevent trafficking and abuse. The government also took back at least 78 children from two Buddhist monasteries in Kathmandu and placed them in temporary camps. The monasteries had offered shelter, education, and employment, but the government discourages such informal arrangements. "We have strictly discouraged religious or charitable organizations from keeping children without following legal procedures," said Chakra Bahadur Budha, a spokesperson at the ministry. Children can be placed with close relatives—uncles, aunts—after verification, but adoption has been discouraged for now.
The scale of displacement is staggering. UNICEF reports that at least 541 children have either lost their parents or become separated from their families. Learning has been disrupted for more than 14,000 children across 62 schools and learning centers in the three most affected districts: Dhading, Nuwakot, and Rasuwa. Hundreds of families have managed to move into rented rooms, but hundreds more remain in temporary shelters and makeshift tents. For women like Karishma and Sabita, the immediate need is simple: a stable place to stay, a private space to bathe, a toilet that works, a roof that does not leak. What they face instead is a landscape of vulnerability, where the systems meant to protect them are still being assembled, and the risks of trafficking, abuse, and exploitation remain acute.
Citações Notáveis
It would be great to have a stable place to stay, where I could cook my own meals, feel safe and have some comfort.— Karishma Tamang, 26-year-old flood survivor
Such situations naturally increase the risk of insecurity, potential harassment and exploitation, especially for young girls and children.— Ayush Joshi, Save the Children Nepal