Each monsoon season, India's northern highlands remind the nation that geography is destiny — and that the institutions built to answer nature's worst moments are themselves mortal, limited, and strained. This year, roughly 537 lives were lost to cloudbursts and landslides across Uttarakhand, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, and Jammu, and the National Disaster Response Force — the country's frontline answer to catastrophe — has been forced to reckon publicly with what it cannot yet do: detect the buried dead electronically, predict the disasters that kill the most, or fully heal the men and women wh
NDRF battles tech gaps, mental strain as India faces intensifying disasters
Radar detectors can't identify dead bodies—only dogs can smell them
So the NDRF can't actually detect bodies with radar. That seems like a basic tool for rescue work.
Right. Radar finds metal and structure—it can tell you there's a house buried under a landslide. But a human body isn't metallic. So they're training dogs instead, which can smell remains. It's effective, but it's also labor-intensive and slower.
How many trained dogs does the NDRF actually have? The article doesn't say. And "training canines now" could mean they're just starting, or it could mean they have a full program. We don't know the scale.
Fair point. What about the mental health piece? That sounds like they've solved it.
They've put a system in place. Counselors are available, feedback happens after operations. But Bundela is describing the mechanism, not its effectiveness. He's not saying every person who needs help gets it.
Exactly. And the article doesn't tell us how many first responders have actually used these counseling services, or whether the counseling is adequate for what they're witnessing. It's a policy, not proof it's working.
So what's the real bottleneck here? Equipment, training, or something else?
All three, probably. But the early warning systems for cloudbursts and landslides—that's what Bundela specifically flagged as the major gap. If you can't predict these events, you can't position people in advance.
And we don't know what "major room for improvement" actually means in terms of timeline or investment. Is this a five-year problem or a twenty-year problem?
The article mentions China and Japan have AI drones. Is the NDRF actually going to get those?
Bundela said they're exploring it. No commitment, no timeline. That's the honest answer from him, but it also means the reader shouldn't expect those tools anytime soon.
Il Polso
- Radar technology the NDRF depends on can find metal and structure but cannot locate a human body — a gap so fundamental that trained dogs remain the most reliable tool for recovering the dead from disaster debris.
- 537 people died across four states in just four months, and the absence of effective early warning systems for cloudbursts and landslides means the force often arrives after the window for saving lives has already closed.
- Other nations — China and Japan among them — deploy AI-enabled drones and remote ground vehicles to reduce rescuer risk and extend reach; the NDRF is exploring these technologies but has offered no timeline for adoption.
- Rescue workers who spend days extracting decomposed remains from rubble carry a psychological burden that accumulates in silence — the NDRF has established counseling access within battalions, but whether it reaches those who need it most remains unresolved.
Each monsoon season, India's northern highlands remind the nation that geography is destiny — and that the institutions built to answer nature's worst moments are themselves mortal, limited, and strained. This year, roughly 537 lives were lost to cloudbursts and landslides across Uttarakhand, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, and Jammu, and the National Disaster Response Force — the country's frontline answer to catastrophe — has been forced to reckon publicly with what it cannot yet do: detect the buried dead electronically, predict the disasters that kill the most, or fully heal the men and women who retrieve the bodies.
In four months this monsoon season, cloudbursts and landslides killed roughly 537 people across India's northern states — Uttarakhand, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, and Jammu — with some victims still unaccounted for. The scale of loss has drawn attention not only to the country's climate vulnerability but to the operational limits of the National Disaster Response Force, the institution charged with saving lives in the aftermath.
Inspector General Narendra Singh Bundela, the NDRF's second-in-command, described those limits plainly. The radar equipment the force relies on can locate buried metal or map a collapsed structure — but it cannot detect a human body. That gap has pushed the NDRF toward a more ancient technology: trained dogs, whose sense of smell remains unmatched by any electronic sensor. The force is now formalizing canine units specifically for body recovery. When asked about AI drones and remote vehicles — tools already deployed by China and Japan — Bundela acknowledged the exploration but offered no commitment or timeline.
The deeper vulnerability, he suggested, lies not in ground-response capacity but in early warning. The cloudbursts and landslides driving this year's death toll arrive with little notice, and the systems meant to predict them have not kept pace with the events themselves.
There is also a cost that appears in no equipment inventory. Rescue workers spend days pulling decomposed remains from debris, witnessing trauma that accumulates long after operations end. The NDRF has responded by stationing counselors within battalions and offering feedback sessions after deployments. The mechanism exists — but whether it reaches everyone who carries the weight of this work is a question the institution has not yet answered.
India's geography — Himalayas to the north, desert to the west, a long coastline to the south and east — means the country faces nearly every category of natural disaster. The NDRF has built real capacity over decades. But the conversation with its second-in-command reveals an institution that knows exactly where its edges are, and is searching, without clear answers, for how to move them.
In the span of four months this year, cloudbursts and landslides across India's northern and western regions killed roughly 537 people. Some remain unaccounted for. The disasters struck Uttarakhand, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, and Jammu with a force that exposed not just the country's climate vulnerability but also the operational limits of the institution tasked with saving lives in their aftermath: the National Disaster Response Force.
Inspector General Narendra Singh Bundela, the NDRF's second-in-command, recently described the specific ways those limits manifest on the ground. When a building collapses or a landslide buries an area, the work of finding and extracting human remains becomes a test of what the force actually has available. Radar detection equipment, which the NDRF relies on, can locate metal or identify the outline of a buried structure. It cannot detect a body. This gap—between what the technology is designed to do and what the work demands—has forced the force to turn to an older tool: trained dogs. Canines can smell human remains in ways no current electronic sensor can replicate. The NDRF is now systematizing this approach, training units specifically for body recovery operations in disaster zones.
When asked whether the force might adopt the kind of advanced technology other nations have deployed—AI-enabled drones and small remote vehicles that China and Japan use to reduce risk during rescue missions—Bundela acknowledged the exploration was underway but offered no timeline or commitment. The NDRF, he noted, performs adequately for ground-based disasters like earthquakes and building collapses. The real gap lies elsewhere: in early warning systems for cloudbursts and landslides, the very events that have driven this year's death toll.
Beyond equipment, Bundela addressed a cost that does not appear in any inventory. Rescue workers spend days and nights extracting decomposed bodies from landslide debris. They witness trauma cases as they pull survivors from rubble. The psychological weight accumulates. The NDRF has established a system to address this: after operations conclude, personnel are offered feedback sessions and access to identified counselors stationed within their battalions. The mechanism exists. Whether it reaches everyone who needs it, and whether it adequately addresses the depth of what these workers witness, remains an open question.
India's position on the map—bordered by the Himalayas to the north, deserts to the west, and a long coastline to the south and east—means the country faces nearly every category of natural disaster. Over decades, India has built disaster management capacity and positioned itself as a regional responder and donor. Yet as extreme weather intensifies, the gap between what the NDRF can do and what the scale of these events demands grows wider. The force continues to operate, to coordinate with state disaster response units and armed forces, to train and deploy. But the conversation with its second-in-command reveals an institution aware of its own constraints and searching, without clear answers, for how to close them.
Citazioni salienti
In certain cases of heavy building collapse or landslide, retrieving humans and especially dead bodies becomes a big challenge, as a lot of equipment doesn't work under these conditions.— Inspector General Narendra Singh Bundela, NDRF second-in-command
You may be handling multiple rotten, dead bodies at a point because we take a lot of time to extricate them from the landslide area. That's particularly tough for the rescuers when they are working day and night.— Inspector General Narendra Singh Bundela