National Guard honors state partnerships driving global security cooperation

Security built methodically over years through training and shared exercises
The National Guard's approach to international partnerships emphasizes long-term institutional development over short-term diplomatic gestures.
Mark

Why does the National Guard run these partnerships instead of, say, the State Department or the Pentagon's regional commands?

Mimi

The Guard operates at a different scale and with different relationships. State partnerships are often between a governor and a foreign military leader—peer-to-peer, less formal than embassy diplomacy. The Guard can move quickly, build personal relationships, and stay engaged over decades without the bureaucratic friction of traditional foreign policy.

Mark

The Arkansas-Guatemala partnership is 23 years old. What does that longevity actually buy you?

Mimi

Institutional memory. Trust. When you've worked with the same partner for two decades, you understand their constraints, their culture, their actual needs versus what they say they need. You can have harder conversations. You can build systems that last—like Guatemala's cyber defenses or their NCO training program—because you know the people who will maintain them.

Mark

The Massachusetts-Paraguay wildfire project sounds almost mundane compared to military training. Why is that an award-winning innovation?

Mimi

Because it solves a real problem using resources that already exist. Fire departments in Massachusetts have equipment they eventually replace. Paraguay faces catastrophic wildfire seasons. The innovation isn't military—it's the framework that connects civilian capacity to a partner nation's actual vulnerability. That's the future of security cooperation.

Mark

The cyber exercise with Kenya and Israel—is that about countering a specific threat, or building relationships?

Mimi

Both. You're defending critical infrastructure, which is real operational work. But you're also creating a network of cyber operators who trust each other, who understand how each nation thinks about defense, who have worked together under pressure. That relationship becomes the foundation for future cooperation when a real crisis hits.

Mark

Michael Sterling managed partnerships across four African countries with the largest SPP budget ever. What does that money actually buy?

Mimi

Training, equipment, institutional development. It could be helping a country build its own military education system, or funding joint exercises, or providing technical assistance to strengthen command structures. The point is self-reliance—you're not creating dependency, you're building capacity that persists after the funding ends.

Mark

These partnerships seem to assume the U.S. military has something valuable to teach. Is that always true?

Mimi

Not always. But the Guard's advantage is that it's not imposing doctrine from Washington. It's working with partners to solve their specific problems using American experience and resources. Sometimes that's cyber defense. Sometimes it's disaster response. Sometimes it's just showing another military how to train its own officers effectively.

  • Arkansas's 23-year Guatemala partnership reached a milestone, earning Strategic Partnership of the Year after 58 engagements in a single year and 93% budget execution aligned with U.S. Southern Command priorities.
  • Massachusetts pushed the boundaries of what state-level military cooperation can look like, orchestrating the first trilateral cyber exercise between the U.S., Kenya, and Israel to stress-test defenses of critical infrastructure.
  • North Carolina's Lt. Col. Michael Sterling managed the largest funding allocation in State Partnership Program history, coordinating 57 security cooperation events across Moldova, Malawi, Zambia, and Botswana.
  • Washington's National Guard earned Preparedness Program of the Year for Indo-Pacific work, including a 170-participant earthquake and tsunami exercise in Thailand and an $18.5 million cyber transformation initiative in Malaysia.
  • Michigan and Liberia built something foundational together — Liberia's first modern NCO professional military education system, graduating its inaugural class and establishing an Officer Candidate School designed to outlast any single funding cycle.
  • Taken together, these partnerships signal a deliberate American strategy: that security cooperation built over years through training and institution-building produces more stable partners than any single deployment ever could.

Each year, the National Guard Bureau pauses to recognize something that rarely makes headlines: the patient, methodical work of building trust and capability across borders. In August 2026, that recognition fell on soldiers and officers from Arkansas, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Washington, Michigan, and Missouri — states whose National Guard units have spent years, and in some cases decades, weaving security relationships across Latin America, Africa, Europe, and the Indo-Pacific. These awards do not celebrate victories in battle but something arguably more durable: the institutions, trained officers, cyber defenses, and disaster response systems that now exist in partner nations where they did not before.

The National Guard Bureau's 2025 State Partnership Program awards, announced in August 2026, honored the states and officers whose international military relationships have moved well beyond ceremony into something operationally consequential — cyber defenses strengthened, disaster response systems built, and professional military institutions established from the ground up.

At the center of this year's recognition stands the Arkansas National Guard's 23-year partnership with Guatemala. In the past year alone, Arkansas conducted 58 engagements with Guatemalan forces, executing 93 percent of its allocated budget in direct service of U.S. Southern Command priorities — earning the program's highest honor, Strategic Partnership of the Year. The award reflects more than efficiency: Arkansas brought Guatemalan military college instructors to the United States for the first time, transferred counter-narcotics dog-handling techniques, fortified Guatemalan cyber defenses, and built a formal professional development curriculum for Guatemalan Army noncommissioned officers. Maj. David Nevarez and Maj. Debora Lopez received individual recognition for leading these efforts.

Massachusetts took a different path, emphasizing innovation and civilian-military coordination. Its 'Whole of Commonwealth' framework enabled fire departments across the state to donate modern equipment to Paraguay for wildfire response — unglamorous work that saves lives. Massachusetts also led 'Cyber Front 2025,' the first trilateral exercise bringing U.S., Kenyan, and Israeli operators together to defend critical infrastructure and identify operational gaps.

North Carolina's Lt. Col. Michael Sterling oversaw 57 security cooperation events across Moldova, Malawi, Zambia, and Botswana — the largest funding allocation in State Partnership Program history — focused on building long-term self-reliance across two continents. Washington's National Guard earned Preparedness Program of the Year for Indo-Pacific work, including a 170-participant earthquake and tsunami exercise in Thailand and, through Lt. Col. Jason Silves, an $18.5 million cyber transformation initiative and Malaysia's first live-fire exercise with advanced rocket systems.

Michigan and Liberia built something designed to endure: Liberia's first modern NCO professional military education system, complete with trained Liberian instructors, a graduated inaugural class, and a newly established Officer Candidate School. Missouri's partnership with Panama earned recognition for sustained operational tempo and disciplined fiscal management.

Collectively, these awards illuminate a quiet but deliberate dimension of American military strategy — the conviction that security built methodically through training, shared exercises, and institutional development creates partners capable of sustaining themselves long after any single engagement ends.

The National Guard Bureau has recognized the year's most consequential international military partnerships, honoring the states and officers who have spent months and years building security relationships that ripple across continents. The awards, announced in August 2026, celebrate not just diplomatic niceties but concrete operational achievements—cyber defenses strengthened, disaster response capabilities built, professional military education systems established from the ground up.

The Arkansas National Guard's 23-year partnership with Guatemala stands at the center of this year's recognition. Over two decades, the relationship has deepened into something operationally significant: Arkansas conducted 58 separate engagements with Guatemala in the past year alone, executing 93 percent of its allocated budget in direct service of U.S. Southern Command's strategic priorities in the region. The partnership earned the program's highest honor, Strategic Partnership of the Year. But the award reflects more than bureaucratic efficiency. Arkansas brought Guatemalan military college instructors to the state for the first time, an investment in developing the country's next generation of senior leaders. The Guard helped Guatemala fortify its cyber defenses against evolving threats, transferred specialized counter-narcotics dog-handling techniques, and built out a formal professional development curriculum for Guatemalan Army noncommissioned officers—the backbone of any military institution. Two Arkansas officers, Maj. David Nevarez and Maj. Debora Lopez, received individual recognition for their roles in managing these initiatives.

Massachusetts took a different approach, emphasizing innovation and civilian-military coordination. Working with Paraguay, the Guard developed what it calls a "Whole of Commonwealth" framework—a system that allowed fire departments across Massachusetts to donate modern fire trucks and protective equipment to help Paraguay strengthen its wildfire response capacity. It is the kind of practical, unglamorous work that saves lives. Massachusetts also led "Cyber Front 2025," the first trilateral cyber exercise bringing together operators from the United States, Kenya, and Israel to work as an integrated team defending critical infrastructure. The exercise was designed not just as a training event but as a strategic platform for identifying operational gaps and building lasting military-to-military relationships.

Other states earned recognition for equally substantive work. Lt. Col. Michael Sterling of the North Carolina National Guard oversaw 57 security cooperation events across four countries—Moldova, Malawi, Zambia, and Botswana—managing the largest funding allocation in State Partnership Program history. His work focused on building self-reliance across Europe and Africa, a long-term investment in regional stability. The Washington National Guard received the Preparedness Program of the Year award for its work in the Indo-Pacific, where it participated in a full-scale earthquake and tsunami exercise in Thailand that brought together 170 military, civilian, and intergovernmental participants. Lt. Col. Jason Silves, also of Washington, managed projects in Malaysia that included bolstering airspace sovereignty, overseeing an $18.5 million cyber transformation initiative, and facilitating Malaysia's first live-fire exercise with advanced rocket systems.

The Michigan National Guard and Liberia's Armed Forces collaborated on something foundational: Liberia's first modern noncommissioned officer professional military education system. The partnership developed Liberian instructors, graduated the first class of Liberian-trained NCOs, and established the country's Officer Candidate School—institutions that will outlast any single engagement or funding cycle. Finally, the Missouri National Guard's partnership with Panama earned recognition for sustained operational tempo, disciplined fiscal management, and consistent compliance with assessment and monitoring protocols.

These awards reflect a quiet but significant dimension of American military strategy: the belief that security cooperation, built methodically over years through training, shared exercises, and institutional development, creates more stable and capable partners. The partnerships span Latin America, Europe, Africa, and the Indo-Pacific—a global network of relationships that are measured not in headlines but in the number of trained officers, strengthened cyber defenses, and disaster response systems that now exist where they did not before.

Arkansas conducted 58 engagements with Guatemala with a 93% budget execution rate in direct alignment with U.S. Southern Command priorities
— National Guard Bureau
Contáctanos FAQ