Minister's Office Warned Contractor Over CFMEU Dispute, Royal Commission Hears

Workers at the Gap Road site reportedly felt fearful of the CFMEU and avoided attending work for long periods.
"Amazingly, all our safety issues ceased."
Stephen Villella said site safety complaints stopped once managers agreed to the CFMEU's demands at Gap Road.
Mark

What's the central new claim from Friday?

Mimi

That Vida's Peter Wilkinson says his manager, Evan Tattersall, told him the minister's office believed the contractors wouldn't get more work in Victoria if they couldn't resolve the dispute.

Luke

Worth being exact: that's Wilkinson relaying what Tattersall said the minister's office felt. It's secondhand, and Wilkinson assumed it meant Jacinta Allan's office.

Mark

So the minister herself isn't quoted?

Mimi

No. Nobody in the reporting says she personally said it. And there's no record of the Wilkinson-Tattersall conversation.

Luke

His explanation was that things were moving fast. That's his account, not something confirmed independently.

Mark

What about the 7 June meeting in Allan's office?

Mimi

He was an optional invitee and can't recall attending. It's the day work restarted, so it's a date the commission clearly cares about.

Luke

But the invite alone proves nothing about what was discussed or who attended.

Mark

And the workers' side?

Mimi

Villella said workers were fearful and sat in the lunchroom, and that the safety issues vanished once demands were met. Tzimas had said workers chose not to work.

Luke

Those accounts conflict, and Myles's counsel disputed who raised the demands. Villella's claim that Myles hinted at a line to the minister's office is also his recollection only.

  • A witness says a ministerial office warned contractors that future Victorian work hung on settling a union dispute at a Sunbury rail site.
  • The warning reached the commission through layers of recollection, with no written record and a key meeting attendance left unrecalled.
  • A former union organiser and a contractor's delivery director give sharply opposing accounts of who held the upper hand at Gap Road.
  • Workers reportedly stayed away from site for long stretches out of fear, and safety concerns vanished once the union's demands were met.
  • Late disclosure of evidence has forced the commission to pause, with new lines of inquiry expected when hearings resume on Tuesday.

On a Friday in November, a royal commission in Victoria heard for the first time from an official of the state's infrastructure authority, whose account placed a quiet warning in the spring of 2022 at the heart of a stalled rail project. The warning, as he recalled it, was that contractors who could not settle an industrial dispute might find no further work in the state. It is the kind of exchange that moves through corridors of power faster than it is written down, and the commission now must weigh memory against the absence of any record. The inquiry, looking into how major public works are built in Victoria, continues to test where authority ends and pressure begins.

On Friday, a royal commission in Victoria heard from an official of the Victorian Infrastructure Delivery Authority for the first time. His evidence concerned a warning that, by his account, reached contractors on a stalled rail project in June 2022: if they could not settle an industrial dispute, they might not get more work in the state.

The commission is examining how major infrastructure is built in Victoria, and its November hearings focus on a 2022 level crossing removal at Gap Road in Sunbury. Earlier testimony described how union officials shut the site over safety concerns and allowed work to resume only after union-aligned safety representatives were installed and labour hire firms were switched to union-aligned companies.

The witness, Peter Wilkinson, said his manager at the authority, Evan Tattersall, told him he had raised the matter with the office of then-transport minister Jacinta Allan. Wilkinson understood the message to mean that contractors John Holland and CPB Constructions could lose work if they could not handle industrial relations. He passed it on to a colleague, and could not recall whether he attended a meeting in Allan's office on the day work resumed. No record of the warning was kept.

Stephen Villella of CPB Constructions described the meeting at union headquarters that ended the dispute as "extremely galling". He said the safety concerns were not serious enough to halt work, and that workers, fearful of the union, avoided the site for long periods. He said a union organiser hinted that cooperation would help win future tenders and implied direct access to Allan's office.

The hearing followed a rebuke of the authority for delaying the disclosure of relevant evidence. The late material has opened new lines of inquiry, and witnesses are not expected again until Tuesday.

On Friday, a royal commission in Victoria heard from an official of the Victorian Infrastructure Delivery Authority (Vida) for the first time. His evidence concerned a warning that, by his account, reached the contractors on a stalled rail project in June 2022: if they could not settle an industrial dispute, they might not get more work in the state.

The royal commission is examining the integrity of major public and civil infrastructure construction projects in Victoria. Its November public hearings, which run until 20 November, are focused on a 2022 level crossing removal at Gap Road in Sunbury. Earlier testimony described how officials of the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) shut the site over purported safety concerns. They let work continue only after two of the union's own health and safety representatives were appointed and the project switched its traffic and labour hire companies to CFMEU-aligned firms.

The Vida witness was Peter Wilkinson, a civil engineer and former Vida official who is now executive general manager of the Suburban Rail Loop authority. He said that at the height of the dispute he talked with his manager at Vida, Evan Tattersall, about the need to get work going again. According to Wilkinson, Tattersall told him on either 6 or 7 June 2022 that he had raised the matter with the minister's office. Wilkinson assumed that meant the office of the then-minister for transport infrastructure, Jacinta Allan.

Tattersall's message, Wilkinson said, was that if they could not handle industrial relations in Victoria, they could not have any more work. Wilkinson understood Tattersall to be talking about the site's contractors, John Holland and CPB Constructions. He knew at the time that both were tendering for the airport rail project, another major state-funded job, but said he did not know whether the minister's office was aware of that. Tattersall did not tell him what to do with the information. Wilkinson passed it to Joe Aygur, general manager of the Rail Network Alliance involved in delivering the project. Aygur told the commission about the warning on Tuesday.

Counsel assisting, Chris Young KC, asked why there was no record of the conversation with Tattersall. Wilkinson said one likely reason was that events were moving quickly and the conversation needed to keep things moving rather than be formally recorded. He was also asked about a meeting set for 5pm on 7 June 2022 in Allan's parliament house office, the day work resumed at Gap Road. He was listed as an optional attendee on the online invite but said he could not recall whether he went.

The commission also heard from Stephen Villella, who worked for CPB Constructions and was delivery director at the site. He described the meeting at CFMEU headquarters that ended the dispute. It was, he said, "extremely galling" for company officials to have to "bend the knee" to the union. He said none of the safety concerns the union raised were serious enough to stop work. Workers were fearful of the CFMEU, he said, and once union officials began attending they would stay in the lunchroom for long periods. "They didn't want to come [to work] at all," he said, adding that they feared what would happen to them organisationally and individually if they did.

Villella disagreed with evidence given earlier in the week by former CFMEU organiser Paul Tzimas, who had said workers chose not to work. Villella said they were heavily pressured by union officials. In the roughly 30-minute meeting, he said, union organiser Joe Myles suggested that collaborating would help win future tenders such as the Melbourne airport rail project, and implied he had direct lines to Allan's office. Villella said he was not surprised, given what he had seen happen in the industry over the past decade. He said Myles left abruptly in the first half of the meeting, which felt like a snub. He rejected a suggestion from Myles's counsel that Tzimas, not Myles, had raised the list of union demands. After managers agreed to the demands, work resumed as normal. "Amazingly, all our safety issues ceased," Villella said.

The hearing followed criticism on Thursday, when Young strongly rebuked Vida for failing to disclose relevant evidence in a timely way. Senior counsel assisting Chris Carr SC said there had been a "substantial production of highly relevant material overnight". That material has opened several new lines of inquiry, and the commission is unlikely to hear from witnesses again until Tuesday.

If they can't handle the industrial relations in Victoria, they can't have any more work.
— Peter Wilkinson, recalling what Evan Tattersall told him
They were fearful of what would happen to them organisationally and individually if they did.
— Stephen Villella, CPB Constructions delivery director
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Guardian ↗
Kontakt FAQ