Our galaxy carries its history in its shape, and a newly published study reads part of that history in the ages of its stars. Some 10.85 billion years ago, when the young universe was still a couple of billion years old, the Milky Way's disk underwent a sharp transformation, with a turbulent, puffed-up layer giving way to a calmer process in which gas slowly settled into a thinner plane. The thick disk, with its ancient and metal-poor stars, appears to have been born in place rather than scattered there later, and this quiet inheritance from a stormy youth is what the stars now record.
Milky Way's Disk Grew Upside Down, With Younger Stars Forming in Ever-Thinner Layers
The disk thinned from 4,100 to 1,600 light-years in only two billion years
So what actually changed about how we think of the Milky Way's disk?
The thick disk used to be explained partly as a scattered population, stars kicked up from the thin disk. This work says those ancient stars were born where they are, in a thick, turbulent early disk.
And the evidence is a date?
A break in the thinning rate about 10.85 billion years ago. Before it, the disk went from about 4,100 light-years thick to about 1,600 in two billion years. After it, thinning slowed a lot, down to about 400 light-years for the youngest stars.
Worth saying that's a reading of ages derived by fitting Gaia data, not ages measured directly. The conclusion rests on how precise those fitted ages are.
The lead author calls it the first clear observational evidence. Is that settled?
That's Mirabal's characterization in a press release. The paper's own language is that it strongly supports the two-phase scenario. Strong support from one analysis isn't the same as consensus.
And the authors say other papers in the collaboration are working on stellar ages too, so cross-checks are coming.
Does this rule out scattering entirely?
The source doesn't say that. It says the thick disk's stars were born in place; it doesn't quantify how much scattering happened afterward, and I wouldn't claim it does.
Right. The headline is the early rapid settling, and that's what the data point to.
Il Polso
- A sharp break about 10.85 billion years ago abruptly thinned the Milky Way's disk within roughly two billion years.
- Two rival explanations for the disk's structure have long clashed, and only precise star ages could tell them apart.
- The team used Gaia data and the ChronoGal approach to date stars with unusual precision, especially the oldest ones.
- The evidence points toward a turbulent early thick disk followed by gentle gas settling that built the thin disk.
- Researchers now plan to test this break against other stellar age datasets to see whether it holds.
Our galaxy carries its history in its shape, and a newly published study reads part of that history in the ages of its stars. Some 10.85 billion years ago, when the young universe was still a couple of billion years old, the Milky Way's disk underwent a sharp transformation, with a turbulent, puffed-up layer giving way to a calmer process in which gas slowly settled into a thinner plane. The thick disk, with its ancient and metal-poor stars, appears to have been born in place rather than scattered there later, and this quiet inheritance from a stormy youth is what the stars now record.
The Milky Way is a spiral of hundreds of billions of stars, and its disk comes in two parts: a thin disk where young stars, the sun and most of the galaxy's gas live, and a puffier thick disk filled with ancient, metal-poor stars where almost nothing new is born. For years astronomers have argued over which came first. One camp held that stars were born in the thin disk and later flung out by gas clouds, spiral arms and the central bar. The other held that the disk grew inward, with each generation forming in a flatter layer as its gas settled.
A new paper in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, led by David Mirabal of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, tries to settle the question by dating stars with care. Working from Gaia data and fitting the stars' colors and brightness, the team traced how the disk's thickness changed over cosmic time. Their central finding is a break about 10.85 billion years ago. Before it, the disk was vast and puffed up, and stars were born within it. Then, in only about two billion years, it thinned dramatically, from roughly 4,100 light-years thick to about 1,600. Afterward the change slowed, and the youngest stars now sit in a layer near 400 light-years.
The result favors the inside-out picture. The thick disk's ancient stars were not tossed there later; they were born there, during a turbulent early epoch, and the calmer settling that followed gave rise to the thin disk we live in today.
Mirabal calls it a resolution of a long-standing problem: simulations allowed both models, but observations had not chosen. The next step is to test the break against other sets of stellar ages.
Start with the structure of the galaxy we live in. The Milky Way holds hundreds of billions of stars in a spiral pattern, and beneath that familiar shape it divides into a bulge, a disk and a halo. The disk itself comes in two parts, a thin disk and a thick disk, and a new study in The Astrophysical Journal Letters argues it can now say which one came first and how.
The two disks differ in more than shape. The thin disk holds young stars and middle-aged ones like our sun, along with the spiral arms where the solar system sits and most of the galaxy's gas and dust. It is where new stars form, and it has higher metallicity, enriched by earlier generations of stars that lived and died. The thick disk is puffier and more diffuse. It holds ancient stars, almost no new ones form there, and its metallicity is much lower. Astronomers sometimes call it a stellar fossil record.
For years, two explanations have competed. In one, stars are born in the thin disk and later get knocked away from its plane by encounters with gas clouds, the spiral arms or the central bar, a process called dynamical scattering. In the other, stars form in the inner disk while their parent gas settles into an ever thinner layer, so each generation is born in a flatter disk than the one before. Telling them apart requires accurate ages for individual stars, which is hard, especially for the oldest.
The paper is titled "A Two-stage Settling of the Milky Way Disk Revealed by Precise ChronoGal Ages." Its lead author is David Mirabal, a predoctoral researcher at the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. The team worked from Gaia Data Release 3, published in June 2022, and this is one of several papers from a collaboration aimed at pinning down stellar ages in both disks. They fit color-magnitude diagrams to the Gaia data, derived age-metallicity distributions for the stellar populations, and studied the vertical profile, meaning where in the disk those stars sit.
The central finding is a break about 10.85 billion years ago, a couple of billion years after the Big Bang. Earlier, the gas was turbulent and the galaxy was puffed up vertically, almost like a single thick disk, and stars were born orbiting within it. As the gas calmed, cooled and contracted, a thinner disk formed inside the thick one, while the older stars kept their orbits in the thick disk.
The numbers show how abrupt the change was. Before the break, the vertical scale height fell from over 1.26 kiloparsecs to roughly 0.5 in only 2 billion years. In round figures, the disk thinned from about 4,100 light-years thick to about 1,600. After that, thinning was far more gradual, and the youngest populations have a scale height of about 0.1 kiloparsecs, or roughly 400 light-years.
That favors the second explanation, an upside-down growth in which the disk built inward from a thick layer. On this reading, the thick disk's ancient stars were not scattered there by gas clouds or spiral arms. They were born there, when the disk was much thicker. The authors describe two distinct phases: an initial, highly turbulent epoch that produced the thick disk, followed by a quieter period of gradual gas settling that formed the thin disk. The result is today's split, with older, metal-poor stars and almost no star-forming gas in the thick disk, and younger stars, most star formation and most of the gas in the thin one.
Mirabal said in a press release that the result resolves a classic problem. Simulations allowed both formation models, he said, but observations had not decided between them. He called this the first clear observational evidence favoring one model for the galaxy's early stage, and credited the precision achieved for the older ages. The natural next step is testing the break against other stellar age datasets.
Citazioni salienti
This is the first clear observational evidence favoring one of the two models for the galaxy's early stage.— David Mirabal, lead author, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
The extremely rapid early vertical settling points to a fundamentally upside-down formation process at early times.— Study authors, The Astrophysical Journal Letters