Military laser weapon cuts border drone activity 75% in two weeks

Now that's gone. That's really where this is making a huge difference.
Colonel Felicio explains why destroying drones permanently with the laser is more effective than temporarily jamming them.
Mark

So the military deployed this laser system and drone activity dropped seventy-five percent in two weeks. That's a pretty dramatic number. How confident are we that the laser caused that drop?

Mimi

The timing is striking—the laser made its first kills on August twenty-fifth and twenty-sixth, and the drop happened right after. But the military officials themselves said there could be other factors. Cartels might have found different routes or changed tactics. It's not a controlled experiment.

Luke

Right. And we should be careful about the baseline. General Guillot said there are roughly one thousand incursions per month, so we're talking about a drop from maybe thirty-three per day to eight per day in the Rio Grande Valley specifically. That's significant, but we don't know if it's permanent or if the cartels are just regrouping.

Mark

The laser destroyed eleven drones in ten days. That seems like a small number if there are thousands of incursions happening. Why is that having such a big effect?

Mimi

The cartels reuse drones. They send the same aircraft up repeatedly to scout positions. Jamming sends a drone back, but the cartel still has it. The laser destroys it permanently. So even though eleven drones is a small number, if those were high-value assets the cartels were relying on, losing them could disrupt operations significantly.

Luke

But we don't actually know which drones were destroyed or how valuable they were. We know the military destroyed eleven drones total since the laser arrived, but we don't know if those were the cartels' best equipment or just whatever was flying that day.

Mark

What about the safety concerns? The FAA was worried about the laser hitting civilian aircraft.

Mimi

The FAA raised concerns early on, which is why they briefly shut down El Paso's airport during training. Now there's coordination between the military and FAA before and after each laser use. Felicio said they check FAA requirements, but he didn't specify what those requirements are or how restrictive they are.

Luke

And we don't know which side of the border these takedowns happened on. If they're all on the Mexican side, that's a different conversation than if they're happening near U.S. airspace. Felicio wouldn't say.

Mark

The military is spending four hundred sixty-five million dollars on this. Is that a good investment?

Mimi

Each shot costs about three dollars, and the system can destroy drones that jamming can only temporarily disable. Other air defense systems use interceptors that cost millions each. So on a per-shot basis, it's cheap. But the system doesn't work well in rain or fog, and it requires clear line of sight to the target.

Luke

And we're only two weeks in. We don't know if the cartels will adapt, if they'll use different drones, or if they'll just wait for bad weather. The long-term effectiveness is still unknown. Also, the contract went to AeroVironment, which produces the laser system—so there's an incentive structure worth noting.

Mark

The cartels are also using armed drones inside Mexico to attack each other. Is that a threat to U.S. personnel?

Mimi

The report documented two hundred twenty-one incidents between twenty twenty-one and twenty twenty-five that killed seventy-seven people. The military is weighing that threat against the eight thousand service members stationed along the border. It's a real concern, but we don't have specifics on how many of those incidents happened near U.S. positions.

Luke

And the laser doesn't address armed drones the same way it addresses surveillance drones. An armed drone is a different threat profile. The military is still figuring out how to handle that.

  • Cartels fly roughly a thousand drones a month along the southern border to scout U.S. positions before moving people and drugs — a surveillance network that jamming alone cannot permanently disrupt.
  • The laser changed that equation almost immediately: eleven drones destroyed in ten days, and drone activity in the Rio Grande Valley fell by three-quarters within the same window.
  • Safety tensions are real — the FAA initially sounded alarms after laser training forced a temporary closure of El Paso's airport, and a misfire near a civilian aircraft could be catastrophic.
  • Military operators now coordinate with the FAA before and after every laser use, while also working with Mexican authorities to track threats that have already killed seventy-seven people in armed cartel drone attacks south of the border.
  • The Army this week awarded AeroVironment a $465 million contract — its first ever for high-energy lasers — signaling that what began as a field experiment is becoming permanent infrastructure, even as rain and atmospheric conditions remain stubborn limits on the beam.

Along the Rio Grande Valley, where the ancient contest between authority and evasion plays out daily in the skies, the United States military has introduced a weapon that does not merely delay but permanently removes — a high-energy laser that has destroyed eleven cartel surveillance drones in ten days and coincided with a seventy-five percent drop in drone incursions since late August. Unlike jamming systems that return a drone to its operator's hands, the laser eliminates the asset entirely, shifting the calculus of a smuggling economy that depends on aerial intelligence. The deployment marks a quiet but consequential turn in how modern states contest the invisible corridors of the border.

Two weeks after the U.S. military deployed a high-energy laser weapon along the southern border, eleven cartel drones have been destroyed and incursions in the Rio Grande Valley have dropped by roughly seventy-five percent. The system fired its first shots on August twenty-fifth and twenty-sixth, following months of training that had temporarily closed El Paso's airport and prompted the FAA to demand ongoing coordination before and after each use.

The laser's strategic value lies in what it does that jamming cannot. Existing systems can force a drone to return to its operator or disable it momentarily — but the cartel keeps the aircraft and can send it up again. The laser removes that possibility entirely. Army Colonel Robert Felicio, commanding the brigade deployed to the border, described the change as "significant." Since the start of the year, the military has intercepted three hundred cartel-linked drones; eleven fell to the laser in a single ten-day span.

The system is operated with an Xbox controller and a tablet-like camera feed — intuitive, officials say, for a generation raised on video games. A CBS News test showed a brief flash of light as the invisible beam delivered precise heat to a small quadcopter, damaging its propeller and destroying its battery. Each shot costs approximately three dollars, compared to the millions required for traditional interceptor missiles. The hardware itself runs between seventeen and twenty-five million dollars per unit, and this week the Army awarded AeroVironment a $465 million contract — its first ever for high-energy laser weapons.

The stakes extend well beyond surveillance. A Department of Homeland Security-funded report documented two hundred twenty-one armed cartel drone attacks inside Mexico between 2021 and 2025, killing seventy-seven people. With roughly eight thousand U.S. service members and law enforcement personnel stationed along the border, military officials are watching that threat closely. Lieutenant Colonel Ray Richards framed the seventy-five percent reduction in drone capability in economic terms: every corridor the cartels lose costs them money, and that disruption, he said, is a huge part of the story.

Officials acknowledge the drop may reflect multiple factors, including cartels shifting routes. But the timing aligns with the laser's arrival, and the logic is straightforward: a jammed drone comes back. A lasered one does not.

Two weeks into deployment, the military's high-energy laser weapon system has destroyed eleven drones suspected of cartel surveillance along the southern border, and in that same window, the number of drone incursions in the Rio Grande Valley has fallen by roughly seventy-five percent. The system made its first kills on August twenty-fifth and twenty-sixth, after months of training that had prompted the Federal Aviation Administration to temporarily close El Paso's airport earlier in the year. Since then, military officials have established regular coordination with the FAA to prevent the laser from endangering civilian aircraft.

The laser represents a shift in how the military responds to the hundreds of drones that appear daily along the border. Existing jamming systems can force drones to return to their origin point or disable them temporarily, but a jammed drone can be sent back up again. The laser, by contrast, destroys the aircraft entirely—eliminating it as a tool the cartels can reuse. Since the start of the year, the military has intercepted three hundred drones linked to cartels; eleven of those fell to the laser in a ten-day span. Army Colonel Robert Felicio, commander of the one-hundred-thirtieth Maneuver Enhancement Brigade deployed to the border, told CBS News the change has been "significant." He did not specify daily drone counts, but Air Force General Gregory Guillot, head of U.S. Northern Command, told lawmakers in twenty twenty-four that the southern border experiences approximately one thousand drone incursions each month.

Military officials have acknowledged that the seventy-five percent drop may reflect multiple factors—cartels shifting routes, for instance—but the timing aligns with the laser's introduction. The system itself is relatively straightforward in operation. During a test CBS News observed, soldiers tracked a small quadcopter drone over an empty field using an Xbox controller and a camera feed displayed on a tablet-like device. Once locked on target, they deployed the laser. The effect was a brief flash of light; the beam itself was invisible, delivering instantaneous heat to precise points on the aircraft. When recovered, the test drone had a damaged propeller and missing battery but remained identifiable. The laser system in use is a version of LOCUST, produced by AeroVironment. The military has deployed multiple units along the border, and this week the Army awarded its first-ever contract for high-energy lasers—four hundred sixty-five million dollars to AeroVironment.

Operators like Army Lieutenant Owen Farquer have found the Xbox controller intuitive, particularly for soldiers who grew up with video games. The system is not without limitations. Rain, vapor, and other atmospheric conditions can degrade the beam's effectiveness. The Navy's top officer, Admiral Daryl Caudle, published an opinion piece in The Washington Post this week advocating for increased investment in high-energy laser weapons, framing them as one tool among many despite their constraints. Officials argue the system is cost-effective: individual units run between seventeen point four and twenty-five million dollars, according to budget documents cited by Laser Wars, a publication focused on military laser technology. Each shot costs approximately three dollars. By contrast, other air defense systems fire interceptors that cost millions of dollars apiece.

Safety concerns remain substantial. The FAA initially raised alarms about deploying the laser near civilian aircraft, warning that a misfire striking a plane would be catastrophic. Felicio said the military coordinates with the FAA before and after each laser use to ensure safe employment of the technology. He did not disclose whether the recent drone takedowns occurred on the U.S. or Mexican side of the border, but noted that the U.S. government is also coordinating with Mexican authorities on tracking potential threats. The cartels deploy drones primarily to survey positions of U.S. service members and law enforcement, allowing them to identify safe corridors for smuggling people and drugs. Army Lieutenant Colonel Ray Richards, head of the two-hundred-eleventh Military Police Battalion from the Massachusetts National Guard, told CBS News that a seventy-five percent reduction in drone capability has direct financial consequences for the cartels. "When you think of that reduction and how that spreads based on X amount of dollars tied to that—I think when you talk about disruption to the cartels, that is a huge part of that story," he said.

The threat extends beyond surveillance. A recent report from the National Counterterrorism Innovation, Technology, and Education Center, funded by the Department of Homeland Security, documented two hundred twenty-one incidents between twenty twenty-one and twenty twenty-five in which armed drones operated by cartels attacked rival groups inside Mexico, resulting in seventy-seven fatalities. Military officials are weighing this threat against the safety of roughly eight thousand U.S. service members and law enforcement personnel stationed along the border. Felicio and Richards brought CBS News to an overlook in the Rio Grande Valley to demonstrate how little distance separates U.S. positions from where drones originate. Service members had tracked the same drone passing near the overlook three times before the CBS News crew arrived, though no drones were visible during the visit. Felicio emphasized the strategic difference the laser makes: jamming forces a drone back temporarily, but the cartel retains the asset and can deploy it again. The laser removes that possibility entirely. "If I'm able to use the laser, now that's gone," he said. "That's, I think, really where this is making a huge difference."

When you just send it back and then it comes back up or is defeated temporarily, but the game changer is ensuring that that tool can't be used again against you.
— Army Colonel Robert Felicio, commander of the 130th Maneuver Enhancement Brigade
When you think of 75% reduction of that capability and how that spreads based on X amount of dollars tied to that—I think when you talk about disruption to the cartels, that is a huge part of that story.
— Army Lieutenant Colonel Ray Richards, head of the 211th Military Police Battalion
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei CBS News ↗
Kontakt FAQ