Britain stands at a moment that many nations have long avoided: a government preparing to speak plainly about its role in a trade that carried more than three million people across the Atlantic, many of whom never reached the other shore. The foreign secretary, Ed Miliband, frames the coming apology as an act of national maturity rather than weakness, insisting that a country can be proud of itself precisely by owning what its predecessors did. Yet the question of money, and of whether words will be matched by material redress, still hangs unanswered, as it has over the Commonwealth for two de
Miliband says slavery apology will not bring added cost for UK taxpayers
Fragile, weak countries can't face up to their past.
Why does Miliband lead with cost rather than the apology itself?
Because that's the obvious objection. He says an apology won't raise costs for taxpayers, and the prime minister has already ruled out reparations.
But note the gap. The prime minister declined to say whether the new approach could involve additional taxpayer money. Miliband's assurance and that silence sit side by side, unresolved.
What is the Blair reference doing in the argument?
It's Miliband's explanation of why this attempt is different. In 2007 Blair spoke of deep sorrow and regret. Miliband calls it sorry not sorry and says Number 10 walked it back.
That's Miliband's characterisation, though. The 2007 wording is on record; the claim about it being walked back is his account in an interview.
And Samoa?
He says CHOGM 2024 ended in a verbal punch-up over slavery, and that the issue has grown for about twenty years. That's why he says the government chose to confront it.
Worth saying the Samoa description is also his. We have no independent account of the meeting in this reporting.
What is actually confirmed about what happens next?
Ministers are starting a structured dialogue with affected countries, and an apology is expected around the G20 in Manchester in November 2027.
Expected, not promised. The process is described as likely to end in an apology, and the cost question remains open.
El Pulso
- Ministers are opening a 'structured dialogue' with affected countries, moving a long-stalled question out of the shadows and into negotiation.
- The prime minister has ruled out reparations but will not say whether new taxpayer money could be involved, leaving a visible gap in the government's message.
- The issue still scars the Commonwealth, after a bitter exchange at the 2024 Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa that the foreign secretary calls a verbal punch-up.
- An apology is expected around the G20 summit in Manchester in November 2027, with the government hoping it will finally free the Commonwealth to move on.
Britain stands at a moment that many nations have long avoided: a government preparing to speak plainly about its role in a trade that carried more than three million people across the Atlantic, many of whom never reached the other shore. The foreign secretary, Ed Miliband, frames the coming apology as an act of national maturity rather than weakness, insisting that a country can be proud of itself precisely by owning what its predecessors did. Yet the question of money, and of whether words will be matched by material redress, still hangs unanswered, as it has over the Commonwealth for two decades.
Ed Miliband has asked for a historical digest of Britain's part in the transatlantic slave trade, and he says reading it has been harrowing. It describes more than three million people shipped over two centuries under the complicity of the British state, with hundreds of thousands dying on the crossings and many who survived facing brutal conditions after landing in the Caribbean and the Americas.
The government is now moving toward a formal apology. Miliband's central assurance is that apologising will not raise costs for British taxpayers, though the prime minister has ruled out reparations and has declined to say whether the new approach could involve additional public money.
Miliband presents this as a break with earlier governments that swept the matter aside, pointing to Tony Blair's 2007 expression of deep sorrow and regret, which he calls a "sorry not sorry" moment. The issue also carries recent weight: at the 2024 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa, the subject erupted into open conflict. Ministers are beginning a structured dialogue with affected countries, and an apology may come around the G20 summit in Manchester in November 2027. What remains to be seen is whether that apology arrives on schedule, whether it eases Commonwealth tensions, and whether the government answers plainly on money.
Ed Miliband says he has asked for a historical digest of Britain's part in the transatlantic slave trade, and that reading it has been harrowing. The foreign secretary described what it contains while speaking on the BBC's Newscast podcast: more than three million people shipped over a couple of centuries, with the complicity of the British state. Hundreds of thousands of them died on the way. Those who survived the crossing faced appalling conditions on the ships and, he said, further suffering after landing in the Caribbean and the Americas.
The interview came as the government moves toward a formal apology. Miliband's main message was about money: considering an apology, he insisted, will not bring higher costs for the British taxpayer. The prime minister has said the UK will not pay reparations to affected countries. He has declined to say whether his new approach could involve additional taxpayer money, which leaves a gap between the foreign secretary's assurance and the prime minister's silence on that point.
Miliband framed the shift as a break with earlier governments, which he said had a habit of sweeping the issue under the carpet. His example was Sir Tony Blair, who said in 2007 that the UK's involvement in the slave trade was a matter of deep sorrow and regret. Miliband called that a "sorry not sorry" moment. In his telling, Blair expressed sorrow, then said sorry, and then Number 10 walked it back. He said that episode is still cited abroad, and that it came up in a recent conversation between Andy Burnham and Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley.
There is also a more recent grievance. Miliband said that on his second day as foreign secretary he was told one of his tasks was the fallout from the 2024 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa, which "didn't go well." In diplomatic language, he said, it ended in a verbal punch-up over this very issue. He added that the question has hung over the Commonwealth for about twenty years but has grown and grown. Given that, he said, the government thought it right to confront it rather than pretend it did not exist.
Burnham now says the government is open to formally apologising. Ministers are beginning what they call a "structured dialogue" with affected countries. The expectation is that an apology could come around the time the prime minister hosts the G20 Summit of world leaders in Manchester in November 2027.
Miliband anticipated the charge that this looks weak. He said it is the opposite: it is fragile, weak countries that cannot face up to their past. He said he is proud of Britain, and that being proud of your country includes being willing to face up to things you didn't do yourself.
The process now under way is likely to end in a formal apology. The government hopes it will also free the Commonwealth to turn its attention to other matters. What to watch is whether the dialogue produces that apology on the expected timetable, whether it calms the tensions that surfaced in Samoa, and whether the prime minister ever answers plainly the question of whether any taxpayer money will be involved.
Citas Notables
Is it weak to do this? I think it's the opposite of weak. I think fragile weak countries can't face up to their past.— Ed Miliband, Foreign Secretary, on BBC Newscast
Blair expressed sorrow, then said sorry, and then it was walked back by Number 10.— Ed Miliband, describing Tony Blair's 2007 remarks