In Manila, Southeast Asian energy ministers have gathered to reckon with a vulnerability long deferred: the region's deep reliance on oil flowing from a war-torn Middle East. With crude prices near $100 a barrel and Chinese export restrictions tightening supply, the conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has transformed an abstract structural risk into an immediate economic burden felt from ministerial chambers to the streets where jeepney drivers can barely cover their fuel costs. The meeting marks a moment when energy security has ceased to be a technical concern and become a q
Middle East conflict forces Asean to accelerate energy security overhaul
Rising fuel prices are straining household budgets and reducing earnings for transport workers, with Manila jeepney drivers reporting fuel costs doubling to $38 per day.
A reserve is a buffer. It is not a strategy.
Mark
Why does it matter so much that Asean imports more than half its oil from the Middle East? Couldn't they just buy from somewhere else?
Mimi
It's not that simple. The Middle East has the cheapest, most abundant crude. Shifting suppliers takes years and requires building new relationships, infrastructure, contracts. You can't just flip a switch.
Luke
And to be clear, the source says "more than half"—that's the Asean Centre for Energy's language. We don't have a precise percentage from the reporting.
Mark
So what happens to ordinary people when prices spike like this?
Mimi
A jeepney driver in Manila saw his daily fuel cost jump from about $19 to $38. That's his margin. That's what he takes home to feed his family. Multiply that across millions of transport workers, and you're talking about real hardship.
Luke
The source gives us one driver's story. That's powerful, but it's one person. We know fuel prices are up and people are protesting, but we don't have broader data on how many workers are affected or by how much across the region.
Mark
The ministers are talking about stockpiling fuel and building a regional power grid. Will that help?
Mimi
The stockpiling is more about the next crisis than this one. It takes time to build storage. The power grid is a decades-long project. These are structural solutions, not emergency relief.
Mark
So they're basically saying we can't fix this fast, but we need to stop being vulnerable like this?
Luke
That's the framing, yes. Though one analyst made a point worth holding: a reserve is a buffer, not a strategy. Stockpiling helps, but it doesn't solve the underlying problem—that the region is structurally dependent on imported oil from an unstable region.
Mark
What would solve it?
Mimi
Electrification, renewables, electric vehicles, cross-border power sharing. But the IEA says that could cost $27 billion just for the power grid by 2040, and that's before you count everything else. It's a massive undertaking.
Il Polso
- More than half of Asean's crude oil originates in the Middle East, and the ongoing U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict has turned that dependence into a live threat, with a severe disruption potentially cutting off nearly 28 percent of the region's total oil consumption.
- China's suspension of oil product exports for October has compounded the pressure, tightening regional supply precisely when shipping lanes through conflict zones are most at risk.
- The human toll is already tangible: Manila jeepney driver Antonio Bandin has watched his daily fuel bill more than double to $38, leaving transport workers across the region earning less while households are forced to choose between fuel and food.
- Ministers are reviewing the Asean Framework Agreement on Petroleum Security and exploring regional fuel-stockpiling arrangements, but analysts warn that insufficient storage capacity means these measures are preparation for the next crisis, not a solution to the current one.
- The longer horizon — the Asean Power Grid, renewable energy deployment, and electrification — could reduce oil dependency, but without structural change the region's energy import bill is projected to surge from $80 billion in 2024 to $245 billion by 2035.
- The Manila meeting's most consequential outcome may be a shift in political consciousness: energy security has moved from specialist debate to a priority for national leaders, raising the question of whether that urgency will endure long enough to fund and coordinate a genuine transformation.
In Manila, Southeast Asian energy ministers have gathered to reckon with a vulnerability long deferred: the region's deep reliance on oil flowing from a war-torn Middle East. With crude prices near $100 a barrel and Chinese export restrictions tightening supply, the conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has transformed an abstract structural risk into an immediate economic burden felt from ministerial chambers to the streets where jeepney drivers can barely cover their fuel costs. The meeting marks a moment when energy security has ceased to be a technical concern and become a question of civilizational resilience — and whether political urgency can be converted into the sustained, generational investment that genuine transformation demands.
Energy ministers from across Southeast Asia convened in Manila this week to face a structural vulnerability that the prolonged U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict has made impossible to defer: more than half of Asean's crude oil originates in the Middle East, and with global prices hovering near $100 a barrel, every escalation sends shockwaves through economies that can least absorb them. The Asean Centre for Energy has calculated that a severe disruption could threaten oil volumes equivalent to nearly 28 percent of the region's total consumption — no longer a theoretical scenario but a live risk, compounded by China's decision to suspend oil product exports for October.
The pressure is already reshaping daily life. In Manila, jeepney driver Antonio Bandin has seen his fuel costs more than double to roughly $38 per day. "We hardly take anything home anymore," he said after joining a street protest. The Philippines remains under a national energy emergency, and the arithmetic facing transport workers — higher fuel costs, lower earnings — is being repeated across the region, where households are increasingly forced to choose between fuel and food.
Ministers reviewed the Asean Framework Agreement on Petroleum Security, designed to coordinate regional responses to supply shocks, and the Philippines signaled openness to hosting future fuel-stockpiling facilities. But analysts tempered expectations. "A reserve is a buffer. It is not a strategy," said Christopher Len of the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, pointing to the gap between emergency measures and the structural change the region actually needs. Insufficient storage capacity means that even well-designed stockpiling arrangements cannot fully absorb a major disruption in the near term.
The longer-term agenda — integrating the region's electrical networks through the Asean Power Grid, accelerating renewable energy deployment, and expanding electric vehicles and biofuels — holds genuine promise but demands time and capital. The International Energy Agency projects that without structural reform, Asean's energy import bill will climb from over $80 billion in 2024 to roughly $245 billion by 2035. The power grid alone requires an estimated $27 billion in investment by 2040. Philippine Energy Undersecretary Felix Fuentebella captured the meeting's deeper significance: the crisis has elevated energy security from a technical discussion among specialists to a priority for ministers and heads of state. Whether that heightened attention will translate into the sustained coordination and investment a genuine energy transition requires remains the defining question the region must now answer.
Energy ministers from across Southeast Asia gathered in Manila this week to confront a problem that has become impossible to ignore: their region's dangerous dependence on oil flowing through a war zone. The prolonged conflict between the United States and Israel against Iran has exposed a structural vulnerability that no amount of planning can quickly fix. More than half the crude oil that feeds Asean's refineries comes from the Middle East, and with global prices hovering near $100 a barrel, every attack on a tanker or refinery sends shockwaves through economies that can least afford them.
The timing of the ministers' meeting underscores the urgency. Chinese refiners have suspended oil product exports for October, tightening supplies just as Middle Eastern tensions threaten to disrupt shipping lanes that carry the lifeblood of the region's energy system. The Asean Centre for Energy has calculated that a severe disruption could put at risk oil volumes equivalent to nearly 28 percent of the region's total consumption. That is not a theoretical concern anymore. It is a live threat.
The human cost is already visible on Manila's streets. Antonio Bandin drives a jeepney—one of the colorful minibuses that move millions of people through the city each day. His fuel bill has more than doubled to about 2,400 pesos, roughly $38, per day. "We hardly take anything home anymore," he said after joining a protest over rising fuel prices. For transport workers across the region, higher prices mean lower earnings. For households, it means choosing between fuel and food. The Philippines remains under a national energy emergency, a declaration that captures the scale of the pressure.
Minsters are expected to review emergency measures launched after crisis talks earlier in the year, particularly the Asean Framework Agreement on Petroleum Security, or Apsa, which aims to coordinate regional responses to supply shocks. But implementation faces real obstacles. The region lacks sufficient storage capacity and inventory reserves to make such arrangements work effectively. Alloysius Joko Purwanto, a senior energy economist at the Economic Research Institute for Asean and East Asia, flagged this gap during a webinar hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The Philippines is exploring regional fuel-stockpiling arrangements and could host future storage projects, according to Energy Secretary Sharon Garin. But analysts are cautious about what such measures can accomplish in the near term.
"This is more about preparing for the next crisis," said Christopher Len, a senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. "A reserve is a buffer. It is not a strategy." The distinction matters. Building storage takes time and money. The current crisis is unfolding now. What ministers are really discussing is how to reshape the region's energy future so that it is not held hostage to Middle Eastern politics.
The long-term agenda includes the Asean Power Grid, a project to integrate the region's electrical networks, and accelerated deployment of renewable energy and electric vehicles. These are not quick fixes. The International Energy Agency estimates that without structural change, Asean's energy import bill will balloon from more than $80 billion in 2024 to about $245 billion by 2035. The power grid alone will require roughly $27 billion in investment by 2040. Wider electrification, including electric vehicles and biofuels, could help curb oil demand and reduce exposure to volatile fuel imports. But these transitions take years to build.
Philippine Energy Undersecretary Felix Fuentebella told Reuters that the crisis has shifted how Asean's leadership thinks about energy. "What the crisis brought was a sharper focus on resiliency," he said. Energy security has moved from a technical issue discussed by specialists to a priority for ministers and national leaders. That shift in attention may be the most important outcome of the Manila meeting. The region cannot quickly insulate itself from Middle Eastern supply shocks, but it can begin, in earnest, to build an energy system that does not depend on them. The question now is whether the urgency will translate into the sustained investment and coordination that such a transformation requires.
Citazioni salienti
What the crisis brought was a sharper focus on resiliency. Energy security has moved from a technical issue to a priority for Asean ministers and leaders.— Philippine Energy Undersecretary Felix Fuentebella
We should use this shock as a lesson to reduce exposure, not only to cushion it.— Christopher Len, senior fellow at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su Bangkok Post ↗