In Manila, Southeast Asian energy ministers have gathered to reckon with a structural fragility that conflict has made undeniable: a region of hundreds of millions depends on oil threading through a war zone. The prolonged U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict, combined with Chinese refiner export suspensions, has pushed crude toward a hundred dollars a barrel and doubled fuel costs for ordinary workers across the region. ASEAN's ministers are reviewing emergency frameworks and long-term renewable transitions, confronting the gap between the crisis they are managing today and the deeper transformation the
Middle East conflict forces ASEAN to accelerate energy security overhaul
Transport workers and households facing doubled fuel costs, reducing household earnings and disposable income.
A reserve is a buffer. It is not a strategy.
Mark
So ASEAN buys more than half its oil from the Middle East. That's a staggering concentration of risk in one region.
Mimi
It is. And when you add in the fact that global prices are around a hundred dollars a barrel right now, and Chinese refiners have stopped exporting oil products, you've got a perfect storm. The region didn't have a choice about where to source oil—geography and economics made it the obvious place. But now that choice is biting them.
Luke
Wait—how much of ASEAN's total energy consumption does Middle Eastern oil actually represent? The source says they import over half the crude for their refineries, but that's not the same as half their total energy. Are we talking about half of oil consumption, or half of all energy?
Mimi
Fair point. The source is specific about crude for refineries, not total energy. But the ASEAN Centre for Energy did warn that a severe disruption could put at risk oil volumes equivalent to nearly twenty-eight percent of ASEAN's final oil consumption. So we're talking about a quarter of their oil supply, which is substantial.
Mark
And the human cost is immediate. Jeepney drivers in Manila are seeing their fuel costs double.
Mimi
Right. Antonio Bandin's daily fuel bill went from about twelve hundred pesos to twenty-four hundred. For a transport worker on a fixed route, that's not a negotiable cost—it comes straight out of what he takes home.
Luke
But here's what I want to know: is that doubling because of the Middle East conflict specifically, or is that the cumulative effect of global price movements? The source doesn't isolate the conflict's impact on prices.
Mimi
That's a fair question. The source doesn't break it down that way. What we know is that prices are around a hundred dollars a barrel and that the conflict has created additional uncertainty and disruption to shipping routes. Whether the doubling is fifty percent conflict-driven or eighty percent—that's not in the reporting.
Mark
The ministers are reviewing the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Petroleum Security. Is that new?
Mimi
No, it existed before. But the emergency talks earlier this year accelerated efforts to actually implement it. The Philippines is exploring regional fuel-stockpiling arrangements and could host storage facilities.
Luke
But Christopher Len said a reserve is a buffer, not a strategy. That's important. These stockpiling measures are meant to help with the next crisis, not solve the current one.
Mimi
Exactly. And the region doesn't even have sufficient storage capacity yet. So we're talking about plans to build infrastructure that doesn't exist, to solve a problem that's happening right now.
Mark
What about the long-term shift toward renewables?
Mimi
That's the real structural answer. The IEA estimates that without major changes, ASEAN's energy import bill could jump from eighty billion dollars in 2024 to two hundred forty-five billion by 2040. The ASEAN Power Grid and wider electrification—electric vehicles, biofuels—could help reduce that exposure. But the Power Grid alone needs twenty-seven billion dollars in investment by 2040.
Luke
And that's assuming governments actually commit to those investments and that the political will holds. The source doesn't tell us whether that's realistic or whether there are competing priorities.
Le Pouls
- With over half of ASEAN's crude imports flowing from the Middle East, an active war zone now sits at the heart of the region's energy lifeline — and the exposure is no longer theoretical.
- Jeepney drivers in Manila have watched daily fuel costs double in months, and across the region, transport workers and households are absorbing losses that policy has not yet caught up with.
- Ministers are reviewing the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Petroleum Security, but analysts warn the region lacks the storage capacity and infrastructure depth to make emergency stockpiling work in the present crisis.
- A severe Middle Eastern supply disruption could threaten nearly 28% of the region's total oil consumption — a figure that reframes stockpiling not as reassurance, but as an inadequate buffer.
- The structural alternative — renewables, electric vehicles, an integrated ASEAN Power Grid — carries a $27 billion price tag and a decade-long timeline, even as the energy import bill is projected to triple by 2035.
- Philippine officials signal that energy security has crossed from technical briefing rooms into ministerial and leadership agendas, but whether political will can outpace the pace of infrastructure reality remains the defining uncertainty.
In Manila, Southeast Asian energy ministers have gathered to reckon with a structural fragility that conflict has made undeniable: a region of hundreds of millions depends on oil threading through a war zone. The prolonged U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict, combined with Chinese refiner export suspensions, has pushed crude toward a hundred dollars a barrel and doubled fuel costs for ordinary workers across the region. ASEAN's ministers are reviewing emergency frameworks and long-term renewable transitions, confronting the gap between the crisis they are managing today and the deeper transformation they have long deferred. The question before them is whether urgency will finally become the engine of structural change.
In Manila this week, energy ministers from across Southeast Asia gathered to confront what the Middle East conflict has made impossible to ignore: the region's near-total dependence on oil flowing through a war zone. With the prolonged U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict pushing global crude toward a hundred dollars a barrel, and Chinese refiners suspending their own oil product exports, ASEAN's supply calculus has shifted sharply. More than half the crude feeding the region's refineries originates in the Middle East — a supply line running through some of the world's most contested waters.
The human cost is immediate and visible. In Manila, jeepney driver Antonio Bandin has watched his daily fuel costs climb from roughly twelve hundred pesos to twenty-four hundred — more than double in months. He is one of thousands of transport workers across the region whose earnings have been consumed by the tank. When fuel prices spike, everything else follows, and workers with fixed routes and fixed fares absorb the loss.
The ministers are reviewing the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Petroleum Security, which aims to coordinate regional responses to supply shocks. The Philippines, under a declared national energy emergency, is exploring fuel-stockpiling arrangements and has signaled willingness to host storage facilities. But analysts at the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia warn that the region lacks the storage capacity and infrastructure depth to implement these measures effectively. The ASEAN Centre for Energy has calculated that a severe Middle Eastern supply disruption could jeopardize oil volumes equivalent to nearly 28% of the region's total consumption. As one senior fellow put it plainly: a reserve is a buffer, not a strategy — it helps weather the next crisis, not the one already underway.
The longer conversation in Manila is about structural change. Ministers are expected to discuss renewable energy deployment, electric vehicles, and regional grid integration — shifts that take a decade or more but could fundamentally reduce the region's exposure to Middle Eastern price shocks. Without such changes, the IEA estimates Southeast Asia's energy import bill will balloon from eighty billion dollars in 2024 to two hundred forty-five billion by 2035. The ASEAN Power Grid alone would require roughly twenty-seven billion dollars in investment by 2040.
Philippine Energy Undersecretary Felix Fuentebella captured the shift: energy security has moved from a technical issue to a priority for ministers and leaders. The war did not create this vulnerability — it simply made it impossible to defer. Whether the urgency of the present crisis can finally drive the structural investments that the old model of dependence can no longer sustain remains the question Manila must answer.
In Manila this week, energy ministers from across Southeast Asia gathered to confront a problem that has become impossible to ignore: their region's near-total dependence on oil flowing through a war zone. The prolonged conflict between the United States and Israel against Iran has exposed vulnerabilities that were always there but easy to overlook when prices were stable and shipping lanes seemed secure. Now, with global crude hovering around one hundred dollars a barrel and Chinese refiners cutting off their own oil product exports, the calculus has shifted. ASEAN buys more than half the crude that feeds its refineries from the Middle East—a supply line that runs directly through some of the world's most contested waters.
The immediate consequence is visible on Manila's streets. Antonio Bandin, who drives a jeepney for a living, has watched his daily fuel costs climb from roughly twelve hundred pesos to twenty-four hundred—more than double in a matter of months. He is one of thousands of transport workers across the region whose take-home pay has evaporated into the tank. Households are tightening. The math is simple and brutal: when fuel prices spike, everything else follows, and workers with fixed routes and fixed fares absorb the loss.
The ministers gathered in Manila are tasked with reviewing emergency measures that were hastily assembled earlier in the year, when it became clear that the Middle East conflict was not going to resolve quickly. Chief among these is the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Petroleum Security, or APSA, which aims to coordinate how the region responds when supply shocks hit. The Philippines, still operating under a declared national energy emergency, is exploring regional fuel-stockpiling arrangements and has signaled willingness to host storage facilities. But there is a gap between what sounds reassuring and what actually works. The ASEAN Centre for Energy has calculated that a severe disruption to Middle Eastern supplies could jeopardize oil volumes equivalent to nearly twenty-eight percent of the region's total oil consumption. That is not a theoretical risk. That is a quarter of the region's energy supply hanging in the balance.
Yet the obstacles are substantial. The region lacks sufficient storage capacity and inventory depth to implement APSA effectively, according to analysts at the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. This is not a problem that can be solved in weeks. Building the infrastructure to stockpile oil, to maintain reserves, to coordinate across multiple nations with different regulatory frameworks—this takes years and billions of dollars. Christopher Len, a senior fellow at the ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, put it plainly: a reserve is a buffer, not a strategy. Stockpiling helps you weather the next crisis, but it does not solve the crisis you are in right now.
Which is why the longer conversation in Manila is about structural change. The ministers are expected to discuss renewable energy deployment, electric vehicles, and energy efficiency—the kind of shifts that take a decade or more to implement but that could fundamentally alter the region's exposure to Middle Eastern price shocks. The International Energy Agency estimates that without such changes, Southeast Asia's energy import bill will balloon from eighty billion dollars in 2024 to two hundred forty-five billion by 2035. The ASEAN Power Grid, a project to integrate the region's electrical networks, would require roughly twenty-seven billion dollars in investment by 2040. These are not small numbers, and they represent a bet that the region's governments are willing to make structural investments to reduce their vulnerability.
Philippine Energy Undersecretary Felix Fuentebella captured the shift in thinking: energy security has moved from a technical issue discussed by specialists to a priority for ASEAN ministers and leaders. The war in the Middle East did not create this vulnerability—it simply made it impossible to ignore. Now the region faces a choice between treating this as a temporary crisis to be managed and treating it as a signal that the old model of energy dependence is no longer sustainable. The ministers in Manila are being asked to accelerate plans that were already on the table. Whether they move fast enough to matter remains to be seen.
Citations marquantes
Energy security has moved from a technical issue to a priority for ASEAN ministers and leaders.— Philippine Energy Undersecretary Felix Fuentebella
A reserve is a buffer. It is not a strategy.— Christopher Len, senior fellow at ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur The Straits Times ↗