After nearly two years of global regulatory navigation, Microsoft received final approval from Britain's Competition and Markets Authority to complete its $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard — one of the largest technology transactions ever attempted. The reversal, won through structural concessions including the sale of cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft, reflects the immense gravitational pull that consolidating power in digital entertainment exerts on regulators worldwide. The deal's path to closure illuminates a recurring tension in the modern era: how societies weigh the promise
Microsoft wins final approval for $69B Activision deal from UK regulator
Dragging out proceedings wastes time and money
So Microsoft finally got the green light from the British regulators. What changed their minds?
The U.K. authority had blocked it initially because they worried Microsoft would shut competitors out of cloud gaming. But then two things shifted the calculation. The European Union approved the deal after Microsoft promised to license Activision games royalty-free to cloud platforms for ten years. And Microsoft also signed a separate agreement with Sony guaranteeing Call of Duty stays on PlayStation for at least a decade.
But did those commitments actually address the original concern, or did the regulators just get worn down?
The regulator imposed a structural remedy—Microsoft has to sell cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft for fifteen years. That's more binding than the voluntary commitments the EU accepted. So there's a real constraint, not just a promise.
The regulator seemed pretty angry about how this played out, though.
Yes. The CEO said Microsoft had resisted restructuring during the initial investigation and kept pushing measures the authority had already rejected. She called it wasteful.
And some observers worry the flip-flop sends a bad signal—that if you push hard enough, regulators will eventually cave.
That's the concern. One antitrust expert said companies and their lawyers might now think "no" from the CMA isn't actually final.
What about the U.S.? Is this deal actually done?
Not necessarily. The FTC lost its court bid to pause the deal, but it's appealing and has signaled it plans to challenge the transaction even after it closes. So Microsoft could face an attempt to unwind it.
The deal could close before a Wednesday deadline, but there's real uncertainty hanging over it from American regulators.
So it's approved in the U.K. and EU, but the U.S. is still fighting.
Exactly. And the FTC's willingness to pursue this after closing is unusual—it suggests they're not giving up.
Le Pouls
- After nearly two years of antitrust battles across more than 40 countries, Microsoft finally cleared its last major obstacle when the UK reversed its earlier decision to block the deal.
- The breakthrough required Microsoft to surrender its cloud streaming rights for all current and future Activision titles to Ubisoft for 15 years — a structural concession the UK regulator had demanded from the start.
- The UK watchdog's chief executive publicly rebuked Microsoft for resisting restructuring during initial proceedings, and antitrust observers warned the reversal could embolden future deal-makers to simply outlast regulators.
- The US Federal Trade Commission remains openly hostile, having already lost in court but filing notice of plans to resume its challenge — and potentially unwind the deal even after it closes.
- With a Wednesday deadline looming, the transaction could be completed imminently, but the specter of continued US regulatory opposition means the story is far from over.
After nearly two years of global regulatory navigation, Microsoft received final approval from Britain's Competition and Markets Authority to complete its $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard — one of the largest technology transactions ever attempted. The reversal, won through structural concessions including the sale of cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft, reflects the immense gravitational pull that consolidating power in digital entertainment exerts on regulators worldwide. The deal's path to closure illuminates a recurring tension in the modern era: how societies weigh the promise of innovation against the peril of concentrated control.
Microsoft cleared its final major regulatory hurdle on Friday when Britain's Competition and Markets Authority approved the company's $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard, reversing an earlier decision to block the deal and opening the door to one of the largest technology transactions on record.
The journey consumed nearly two years. Microsoft announced the purchase in January 2022, aiming to add Activision's vast portfolio — Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, Candy Crush, and others — to its Xbox division. The deal won approval in over 40 countries, including the EU, which required Microsoft to license Activision titles royalty-free to cloud gaming platforms for a decade. Britain and the United States proved far more resistant. The UK watchdog initially blocked the deal over fears Microsoft could lock competitors out of the emerging cloud gaming market, while the US Federal Trade Commission mounted a legal challenge that failed in court but has not been abandoned.
To win British approval, Microsoft agreed to sell its cloud streaming rights for all current and future Activision games — across a 15-year window — to French studio Ubisoft. Regulators also weighed a separate agreement Microsoft struck with Sony to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation for at least ten years.
The reversal came with pointed criticism. CMA chief executive Sarah Cardell said Microsoft had resisted restructuring throughout the initial investigation, insisting on remedies the regulator had already deemed insufficient. Antitrust observers echoed the concern from a different angle: while the structural remedy was considered stronger than what the EU had accepted, the watchdog's about-face risked signaling to future deal-makers that a firm "no" from regulators is merely an opening position.
Microsoft President Brad Smith welcomed the decision, and Activision CEO Bobby Kotick expressed eagerness to join the Xbox team. The deal could close before a Wednesday deadline — but the FTC has filed notice of plans to resume its challenge, leaving open the possibility of an attempt to unwind the transaction even after it is complete.
Microsoft cleared its final major regulatory hurdle on Friday when Britain's Competition and Markets Authority granted approval for the company's $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard, reversing an earlier decision to block the deal and opening the path to close what stands as one of the largest technology transactions on record.
The journey to this moment has consumed nearly two years. Microsoft announced the purchase in January 2022 with the intention of adding Activision's sprawling portfolio—Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, Candy Crush, Diablo, and Overwatch among them—to its Xbox division. Since then, the deal has navigated antitrust scrutiny across more than 40 countries. The European Union granted its blessing after Microsoft committed to licensing Activision titles royalty-free to cloud gaming platforms for a decade. But Britain and the United States proved more resistant. The U.K. watchdog initially rejected the transaction, citing concerns that Microsoft could lock competitors out of the cloud gaming market, where players stream games to tablets and phones rather than purchasing expensive consoles. American regulators at the Federal Trade Commission mounted a legal challenge that ultimately failed in court, though the agency has signaled it intends to appeal and potentially unwind the deal even after it closes.
To win over the British regulator, Microsoft made structural concessions. The company agreed to sell its cloud streaming rights for all current and future Activision games—across a 15-year window—to the French studio Ubisoft Entertainment, excluding the European Union and three other European nations where Microsoft had already made separate commitments. The U.K. authority also factored in a separate agreement Microsoft had struck with Sony to keep Call of Duty available on PlayStation for at least ten years, addressing fears that the gaming giant might use Activision's flagship franchise to disadvantage its rivals.
Yet the British regulator's reversal came with sharp criticism. Sarah Cardell, the Competition and Markets Authority's chief executive, said Microsoft had resisted restructuring during the initial investigation and instead "continued to insist on a package of measures that we told them simply wouldn't work." She characterized the extended proceedings as wasteful. The regulator's about-face also drew scrutiny from antitrust observers. Max von Thun, director of the Europe office at the Open Markets Institute, credited the U.K. authority for imposing what he called a "significantly stronger" structural remedy than the European Commission had accepted, but he warned that the watchdog's flip-flopping could signal weakness to future deal-makers. "Moving forward, there is now a serious risk that in their dealings with the CMA, merging companies and their advisors will no longer take no for an answer," he said.
Microsoft President Brad Smith expressed gratitude for the "thorough review and decision," while Activision CEO Bobby Kotick said the company looked forward to joining the Xbox team. Joshua Chapman, a venture capital investor focused on gaming startups, argued the acquisition would benefit players and strengthen competition across the industry. The deal could now close before a Wednesday deadline, though uncertainty persists. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has not abandoned its opposition and has filed notice of plans to resume its challenge, signaling a determination to reverse the transaction even if it has already been completed.
Citations marquantes
The new deal will stop Microsoft from locking up competition in cloud gaming as this market takes off, preserving competitive prices and services for UK cloud gaming customers.— U.K. Competition and Markets Authority
Microsoft had the chance to restructure during our initial investigation but instead continued to insist on a package of measures that we told them simply wouldn't work.— Sarah Cardell, CEO of the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority