In the closing days before a consequential election, a Michigan congresswoman has broken ranks with her own party, a familiar human drama of rivalry turning into betrayal. Representative Haley Stevens, who lost the Democratic primary for the Senate seat to Abdul El-Sayed, chose to back the Republican Mike Rogers instead. The state Democratic chair, Curtis Hertel Jr., answered in public by accusing her of lying to the voters who sent her to Washington, a charge that speaks as much to the fragility of party loyalty as to the facts of this one endorsement. What the reporting leaves unsettled is w
Michigan Democratic chair accuses Rep. Haley Stevens of lying to constituents after Rogers endorsement
A primary rivalry has turned into an open break.
In the closing days before a consequential election, a Michigan congresswoman has broken ranks with her own party, a familiar human drama of rivalry turning into betrayal. Representative Haley Stevens, who lost the Democratic primary for the Senate seat to Abdul El-Sayed, chose to back the Republican Mike Rogers instead. The state Democratic chair, Curtis Hertel Jr., answered in public by accusing her of lying to the voters who sent her to Washington, a charge that speaks as much to the fragility of party loyalty as to the facts of this one endorsement. What the reporting leaves unsettled is what she is alleged to have concealed and why she made this choice, questions that will determine whether this is a passing scar or a lasting division.
Over the weekend, Michigan Democratic Representative Haley Stevens did something few in her party expected. She endorsed Republican Mike Rogers for U.S. Senate, turning her back on Abdul El-Sayed, the Democrat who had been her rival in the primary. The decision did not stay quiet for long.
Curtis Hertel Jr., chair of the Michigan Democratic Party, answered publicly, telling CBS News' "The Daily Report" that Stevens had lied to her own constituents. It was a pointed accusation to level at a fellow Democrat in Congress, and it exposed a rift that a Senate race normally works to close after a primary.
The reporting is still thin. It does not say what Hertel believes Stevens misled voters about, nor does it give her reasons for backing Rogers. Neither she, Rogers, nor El-Sayed had responded in the source material.
What is clear is the shape of the break: a rivalry has become an open fight, and the Senate contest in Michigan now carries a Democratic name in Rogers's column. How much that endorsement will matter to voters remains to be seen.
Over the weekend, Democratic Rep. Haley Stevens of Michigan did something her party had not expected: she endorsed Republican Mike Rogers for U.S. Senate. The endorsement came at the expense of Abdul El-Sayed, the Democrat who had been her opponent in the primary.
The move landed hard inside the Michigan Democratic Party. Curtis Hertel Jr., who chairs the state party, responded publicly. He said Stevens had lied to her own constituents, a blunt charge to level at a sitting member of Congress from his own party. He made the comments in an appearance on CBS News' "The Daily Report."
The basic facts are limited but clear. Stevens, a Democratic congresswoman, competed against El-Sayed in the Democratic primary for the Senate seat. Rogers is the Republican in the race. Stevens chose to back Rogers rather than the Democratic candidate who had beaten her or otherwise emerged as her party's choice, and the party's top official in the state answered with an accusation about honesty.
The source material, a short broadcast description, does not spell out what Hertel believes Stevens misled constituents about. It does not lay out her stated reasons for backing Rogers, nor does it include a response from Stevens, Rogers, or El-Sayed. Those pieces will matter in judging how deep the rift runs and what, specifically, Hertel is alleging.
What is plain is the shape of the conflict. A primary rivalry has turned into an open break, with a former candidate crossing party lines to support the opposing nominee and the state chair publicly condemning her for it. Such a fight is unusual in a Senate race, where parties generally try to close ranks after a primary.
The Michigan Senate contest is the setting for all of this, and the endorsement hands Rogers a notable Democratic name in his column. How much weight it carries with voters is not established in the reporting.
What to watch next: whether Democratic leaders move to respond formally to Stevens, whether she explains her decision in her own words, and how the split shapes the race between El-Sayed and Rogers.
Citazioni salienti
Stevens lied to her own constituents.— Curtis Hertel Jr., Michigan Democratic Party chair
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su CBS News ↗
Politics & Governance