At its annual developer conference in Menlo Park, Meta unveiled three new smart glasses models — including the Ray-Ban Display, a nearly ordinary-looking pair of glasses carrying a tiny lens screen, voice AI assistant, and app-controlling wristband — marking a quiet but consequential shift in how the company imagines technology fitting into daily life. Where once the pitch was virtual worlds and gaming, the new argument is simpler and older: that the most powerful tool is the one you are already wearing. At $799 and launching September 30, the glasses ask consumers not just to buy a device, bu
Meta launches AI-powered smart glasses with display and voice assistant at $799
Glasses that see what you see, hear what you hear, and think about it.
Mark
So Meta is essentially saying that smart glasses are the next computing platform. Is that actually credible, or is this the metaverse hype all over again?
Mimi
The difference is that they're not leading with the metaverse this time. They're leading with everyday utility—texts, directions, voice commands. That's a much more grounded pitch. The glasses look normal, which matters for adoption. But yes, underneath it all, Meta is positioning this as the platform where superintelligence gets deployed to regular people.
Luke
Hold on. The live demo failed. Zuckerberg asked it to do two simple things and both didn't work. How mature is this technology actually?
Mimi
Fair point. The glasses clearly aren't finished. But that's not unusual for a developer conference announcement. The hardware exists, the form factor works, the AI assistant exists—it just needs refinement. The September 30 launch date suggests they think it's close enough.
Mark
Why double the price? The old Ray-Bans were cheaper. Are they betting people will pay more for a screen and an AI assistant?
Mimi
Yes. You're getting a display, a voice AI, app support, and a wristband controller. That's a lot more than a camera. But you're right—it's a significant jump. They're betting the utility justifies it.
Luke
What about the privacy angle? These glasses have cameras and microphones. They're recording what you see and hear. The source doesn't really address what happens to that data or how people feel about wearing a recording device on their face all day.
Mimi
That's a real gap in the reporting, and it's a real question for Meta. The glasses are designed to be always-on in some sense. That's powerful for the AI, but it's also a privacy concern that hasn't been fully litigated in the public conversation yet.
Mark
So the real story is whether people will accept constant recording in exchange for convenience?
Mimi
Partly. But also whether the AI is actually useful enough to justify it. If the glasses can't reliably do what you ask, people won't wear them, privacy concerns or not.
Luke
One more thing—the source mentions millions of people bought the original Ray-Bans, but doesn't give a number. We don't actually know how successful they were. That context would help us understand whether this is a proven market or Meta hoping to repeat a fluke.
El Pulso
- A live stage demonstration misfired twice — the glasses failed to retrieve a recipe and couldn't place a call — exposing the gap between Meta's sweeping vision and the technology's current reliability.
- Meta is abandoning the metaverse as its primary sales pitch, pivoting instead to mundane, immediate utility: reading texts while walking, finding a nearby store, navigating hands-free.
- Three distinct models — a display-equipped flagship, an upgraded classic, and an Oakley sports variant — signal that Meta is casting a wide net rather than betting on a single design or audience.
- The $799 price point, roughly double the previous generation, raises the stakes for consumer adoption of a device that continuously records its surroundings and feeds data to an AI system.
- Meta's billions in AI infrastructure investment are quietly converging on smart glasses as the preferred delivery mechanism — lighter and less conspicuous than VR headsets, and potentially reaching anyone who wears sunglasses.
At its annual developer conference in Menlo Park, Meta unveiled three new smart glasses models — including the Ray-Ban Display, a nearly ordinary-looking pair of glasses carrying a tiny lens screen, voice AI assistant, and app-controlling wristband — marking a quiet but consequential shift in how the company imagines technology fitting into daily life. Where once the pitch was virtual worlds and gaming, the new argument is simpler and older: that the most powerful tool is the one you are already wearing. At $799 and launching September 30, the glasses ask consumers not just to buy a device, but to accept a new kind of intimacy between their senses and a machine.
Meta spent four years building on an unexpected success. When its first smart glasses — designed mainly to capture photos and video — sold to millions, the company recognized an appetite for eyewear that did more than correct vision. On Wednesday, at its developer conference in Menlo Park, it announced three new models aimed at different slices of that market.
The centerpiece is the Ray-Ban Display: glasses that look nearly ordinary but carry a tiny lens screen capable of showing apps, streaming music, and sharing content to Instagram. A wristband handles app control. More significantly, a voice-activated AI assistant can listen through a microphone, see through a camera, and respond through a speaker. It launches September 30 at $799 — roughly double the previous generation's price. The other two models include an upgraded version of the existing Ray-Bans and an Oakley sports variant, together suggesting Meta is pursuing multiple form factors rather than a single design.
The live demonstration revealed both the ambition and the limits of the hardware. Zuckerberg asked the glasses to retrieve a barbecue sauce recipe and to call a colleague. Both failed. The audience laughed; Zuckerberg acknowledged his team had warned against live demos. He recovered by articulating the larger vision: glasses that see what you see, hear what you hear, and process that information independently.
The conference also marked a notable shift in framing. Gone was the metaverse as the primary pitch. In its place: practical, everyday tasks — reading a text while walking, getting directions, accessing information hands-free. Melissa Otto of S&P Global Visible Alpha captured the strategic logic: the metaverse was always going to appeal mainly to gamers, but smart glasses could reach anyone who wears sunglasses, a vastly larger market.
Meta has committed billions to AI infrastructure and data centers, with Zuckerberg describing smart glasses as the ideal platform for deploying advanced AI to mainstream consumers. The cameras, microphones, and speakers are nearly invisible — a design advantage over bulkier VR headsets. But the deeper question remains unanswered: whether consumers will choose to wear a camera and microphone on their face all day, trusting that the data flowing through it will be handled responsibly. That is a different kind of bet than the one that made the original Ray-Bans a quiet hit.
Meta spent four years building on an unexpected success. When the company first released smart glasses designed mainly to capture photos and video, millions of people bought them. The product proved there was appetite for eyewear that did more than correct vision or shield from sun. On Wednesday, at its annual developer conference in Menlo Park, California, Meta announced it was doubling down on that bet with three new models, each aimed at a different slice of the market.
The centerpiece is the Ray-Ban Display, a pair of glasses that looks almost ordinary but carries a tiny screen embedded in the lens. That screen can show applications, stream music through built-in speakers, and share content directly to Instagram. A wristband controls the apps. More significantly, the glasses include a voice-activated artificial intelligence assistant—one that can listen through a microphone, see through a camera, and respond through a speaker. The device launches September 30 at $799, roughly double what Meta charged for its previous generation.
The other two models represent different strategies. One is an upgraded version of the existing Ray-Ban smart glasses. The third is a sportswear variant made in partnership with Oakley, designed for people who want the technology in a more athletic frame. Together, the three products suggest Meta is not betting on a single form factor but rather trying to reach different kinds of users.
During the live demonstration on stage, the technology showed its seams. Zuckerberg asked the glasses to retrieve a barbecue sauce recipe and to call a colleague. Both requests failed. The audience laughed as Zuckerberg acknowledged the mishap, noting that his team had advised against live demonstrations. He recovered by describing the vision: glasses that can see what you see, hear what you hear, and then process that information independently. It was a moment that revealed both the ambition and the current limitations of the hardware.
Meta has long framed its eyewear as a gateway to the metaverse—the virtual world Zuckerberg has positioned as the internet's future. But at this year's conference, the pitch shifted toward practical, everyday applications. The company emphasized reading text messages while walking, getting directions to a nearby store, or accessing information hands-free. These are not science fiction scenarios. They are the kinds of tasks people already do on their phones, just relocated to glasses.
This reframing matters because it reflects where Meta is actually investing its resources. The company has committed billions of dollars to building new data centers and restructuring its artificial intelligence division, with a stated goal of creating what it calls superintelligence—a hypothetical form of AI more capable than the human mind. Zuckerberg described smart glasses as the ideal platform for deploying that kind of intelligence. Unlike the company's bulkier virtual reality headsets, smart glasses resemble ordinary eyeglasses. The cameras, microphones, and speakers are nearly invisible. Melissa Otto, head of research at S&P Global Visible Alpha, noted the strategic advantage: the metaverse was always going to appeal mainly to gamers, but smart glasses could reach anyone who wears sunglasses. That is a vastly larger market.
The $799 price tag is steep, but it reflects the technology packed inside. Whether consumers will adopt glasses that constantly record their surroundings and feed that data to an AI system remains an open question. Meta is betting they will, especially as the glasses become lighter, faster, and more useful. The company is essentially asking people to wear a camera and microphone on their face all day—and to trust that the data flowing through it will be handled responsibly. That is a different kind of bet than the one that made the original Ray-Bans a hit.
Citas Notables
The glasses will be able to see what you see, hear what you hear, and then go off and think about it.— Mark Zuckerberg, Meta CEO
The metaverse was geared very much toward gamers. But think about how many people wear sunglasses.— Melissa Otto, head of research at S&P Global Visible Alpha
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en Bangkok Post ↗
Technology