Mental health cover is mandated, but insurers may still refuse to pay for regular therapy sessions

Having mental health coverage does not mean every therapy session is covered.
The law mandates parity for mental illness, but policy terms decide whether outpatient therapy is reimbursed.
Mark

If the law says mental illness must be covered, why do therapy claims fail?

Mimi

Because the law requires parity, not payment for everything. A hospitalisation-only policy won't reimburse outpatient sessions, whatever it says about mental health.

Mark

So what should someone look for?

Mimi

An outpatient, psychotherapy or counselling benefit, and whether it pays your own therapist's bills or just gives you sessions through the insurer's app.

Luke

Worth noting most of this comes from one expert, Saurabh Vijayvergia of CoverSure. The statute and IRDAI directions are documented, but the practical advice is his reading.

Mark

What about the limits inside a policy?

Mimi

Per-session caps, session counts, co-payments, shared outpatient allowances. A big sum insured can still leave only a small pool for therapy.

Luke

And we don't know how common any of that is. The government told Parliament in July 2026 that IRDAI doesn't track reasons for individual denials, so there's no official ranking of why mental health claims fail.

Mark

Can a restriction itself be illegal?

Mimi

Vijayvergia says restrictions aimed specifically at mental illness deserve scrutiny against parity, and not every printed restriction is necessarily compliant.

Luke

Necessarily is the key word. Nothing here says which restrictions are unlawful, or that any specific one is.

Mark

What can a person do today?

Mimi

Check the schedule and the Customer Information Sheet, ask the insurer in writing, and look at employer counselling benefits.

  • A weekly therapy session costing around Rs 2,000 quietly adds up to more than Rs 1 lakh a year on top of premiums already paid.
  • Mental health parity is law, yet hospitalisation-only plans leave regular outpatient therapy with no reimbursement at all.
  • App-based counselling and small outpatient allowances can run dry after only a few sessions, leaving policyholders to absorb the rest.
  • Claims are being rejected or trimmed over missing waiting periods, provider rules and exhausted limits, with no public data on why.
  • Policyholders are being urged to read the schedule, Customer Information Sheet and full wording, and to ask insurers in writing before assuming cover.

Across India, a person who has legally been promised that mental illness will be treated like any other illness can still find that the weekly conversation that keeps them well falls outside the printed promise. The law and the regulator have drawn a clear line against excluding mental illness as a category, yet parity on paper does not guarantee payment for every form of care, and the gap lives in the schedules, sub-clauses and limits that most policyholders never read. It is a familiar human story in a new setting: a right stated broadly, meeting the narrower terms of a contract. The lesson for the reader is less about outrage than about patience with the document itself.

A weekly therapy session in India can cost Rs 2,000 or more, and over a year that becomes more than Rs 1 lakh, on top of the health insurance premium that people assume should help. The law is firm on paper. Section 21(4) of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 requires insurers to cover mental illness on the same basis as physical illness, and IRDAI has repeated that instruction since 2018. Yet as Saurabh Vijayvergia of CoverSure explains, parity is not an unlimited promise. A policy may pay for hospital care for mental illness and still refuse to reimburse outpatient therapy, and a counselling benefit may only work through the insurer's own app or network.

For someone paying Rs 1,500 for each weekly session, the answer depends on the wording. Outpatient or psychotherapy benefits may sit in the base policy, arrive as an add-on, or come through an employer. Limits such as annual allowances, per-session caps, co-payments and session counts decide how much is actually paid, and a large hospital sum insured says little about regular therapy. Providers may need to be approved, and waiting periods can apply. Vijayvergia suggests checking the schedule, the Customer Information Sheet, and then searching the full wording for terms like OPD, psychotherapy and counselling, while asking the insurer in writing whether recurring sessions with a chosen provider are covered.

When claims are refused, the reason matters. A denial because of mental illness is different from one because the expense falls outside the benefit bought, and unjustified decisions can go to the insurer's grievance process and then the Insurance Ombudsman. The government has acknowledged that IRDAI tracks overall repudiations but not individual reasons, so the scale of the problem remains unclear. Meanwhile, employer assistance programmes and riders are worth exploring for anyone whose policy stays silent on therapy.

A weekly therapy session in India can cost Rs 2,000 or more. Do that every week and the bill reaches at least Rs 8,000 a month and more than Rs 1 lakh a year, on top of the annual premium already paid for health insurance. The natural assumption is that the policy will help. In practice, it often does not.

The legal footing is clear. Section 21(4) of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 requires insurers to provide medical insurance for mental illness on the same basis as for physical illness. IRDAI directed insurers to comply in August 2018 and repeated the instruction in October 2022, saying products must cover mental illness and follow the Act. Saurabh Vijayvergia, Founder and CEO of CoverSure, adds that the regulator has also asked insurers to offer products for people with mental illness, supported by underwriting policies that do not reject an application solely on that ground. In his words, mental illness cannot simply be excluded as a category from medical-expense cover.

But parity, he says, is not an unlimited promise to pay for every form of care. A policy may cover hospitalisation for mental illness and still not reimburse outpatient therapy. Another may offer a fixed number of counselling sessions through an app, but not pay for a therapist the policyholder chooses. A hospitalisation policy does not become an outpatient policy, he notes, and a fixed-benefit policy pays according to its specified triggers rather than reimbursing every bill.

Take someone paying Rs 1,500 per weekly session and wondering whether to submit the bills. The answer depends on the policy. For therapy outside a hospital, Vijayvergia says, the policy needs an outpatient benefit, a psychotherapy or counselling benefit, or a service benefit providing eligible sessions. These may sit in the base policy, come as an optional add-on, or arrive through an employer's benefits package. He also urges checking whether the benefit pays your chosen therapist or only offers sessions through the insurer's own network or app, which he calls materially different. Treatment tied to an admissible hospitalisation may qualify under pre- or post-hospitalisation cover, within a time window, but that does not extend to unrelated ongoing therapy.

Nor are therapy, counselling and psychiatric care a single benefit. Outpatient psychiatric consultations, medicines and psychotherapy depend on the relevant outpatient benefits, while counselling for stress, parenting or relationships may be a separate service with its own eligibility rules. Vijayvergia says a formal diagnosis or a psychiatrist's referral should not be described as a universal requirement for every counselling benefit.

The fine print then decides how much is actually payable. Limits can include an annual allowance, a per-session cap, a maximum number of sessions, co-payments, or a shared outpatient limit. A large hospitalisation sum insured, Vijayvergia says, tells you very little about what is available for regular therapy; a small outpatient allowance can run out after a few sessions. Providers may need to be eligible professionals, on an approved list, booked through an app, or backed by clinical records. Waiting periods matter too: under IRDAI's framework, the wait for disclosed pre-existing conditions is capped at 36 months of continuous cover, though a policy may set a shorter one. Any restriction aimed specifically at mental illness should be checked against the parity requirement, since not everything printed in a policy is necessarily compliant.

For a quick check, Vijayvergia suggests starting with the policy schedule to confirm the plan, variant and optional benefits, then the Customer Information Sheet, which summarises coverage, exclusions and limits. Next, search the full wording for terms such as OPD, outpatient, psychotherapy, psychologist, counselling, psychiatric, mental illness and e-counselling, and read each clause in full. He frames three questions: which service is covered, who can provide it, and how much the policy pays. If the wording is unclear, ask the insurer in writing: will this policy pay for recurring outpatient psychotherapy with my chosen provider, and which clause, limits, waiting period and documents apply?

Claims can still be rejected or trimmed. Vijayvergia lists outpatient bills filed under hospitalisation-only cover, an incomplete waiting period, an exhausted allowance, providers outside the conditions, and missing records. A claim may also be cut because of a benefit limit or co-payment. If refused, ask for the precise contractual reason in writing. A denial because the treatment is for mental illness is very different, he says, from one because the expense falls outside the benefit purchased. Unjustified denials can go to the insurer's grievance process and then the Insurance Ombudsman where appropriate.

There is a data gap. In July 2026, the government told Parliament that IRDAI collects figures on overall claim repudiations but not the reasons for individual denials, so there is no reliable official ranking of why mental health claims fail. For those without cover, the employer's employee assistance programme or mental health service is worth checking, as is asking the insurer whether an outpatient or counselling benefit can be added.

Parity in coverage, not an unlimited promise to pay for every form of care.
— Saurabh Vijayvergia, Founder and CEO, CoverSure
A denial simply because the treatment is for mental illness is very different from a denial because a particular outpatient expense falls outside the benefit purchased.
— Saurabh Vijayvergia, CoverSure
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en India Today ↗
Contáctanos FAQ