Marriages now last 13 years before divorce, longest on record, as couples delay splits

I took the time I needed to turbocharge my career before pressing 'eject'
Celia describes her deliberate strategy to build financial security before divorcing her 12-year marriage.
Mark

So marriages are lasting longer before divorce. That's counterintuitive—I'd have expected the opposite with no-fault divorce making it easier to leave.

Mimi

Right, but easier to leave legally doesn't mean easier to leave financially. Separating one household into two is expensive, and legal aid has been cut. Couples need time to figure out if they can actually afford it.

Luke

But we should be careful here. The ONS explicitly says they don't know why this is happening. These are all hypotheses—financial pressure, the no-fault law itself, cultural shifts. We're not certain which one matters most.

Mark

What about the women initiating divorces—that detail seemed important.

Mimi

It is. Women are still the ones filing, so when we say marriages are lasting longer, we're really saying women are waiting longer. That suggests something about their economic vulnerability or their sense of security has changed.

Luke

And Carter's argument about marriage as refuge is interesting, but it's also sociological interpretation. We don't have data showing that's actually why women wait. We have her observation and her theory.

Mark

What struck me most was Celia's story—the deliberate career-building before divorce.

Mimi

That's the lived experience behind the statistics. She knew the financial math didn't work in her favor, so she changed the equation before leaving. And she wasn't alone—her friends did similar things.

Luke

Though we should note that Celia is an AI analyst, which is a well-paid field. Her ability to "turbocharge" her career may not be available to everyone. The statistics don't tell us how much of this pattern is about deliberate strategy versus just grinding it out because you have no choice.

Mark

The same-sex marriage numbers are much lower—6.6 years for female couples.

Mimi

But that's partly because same-sex marriage only started in 2014. The pool of marriages old enough to divorce is still young. It's not a fair comparison yet.

Luke

Exactly. And Maine's point about the weight of marriage equality—that divorce feels like failing the community—that's plausible but it's one person's interpretation. We don't have survey data on whether same-sex couples actually feel that burden.

Mark

So what's the real story underneath all this?

Mimi

That people are staying in marriages longer, for reasons that are probably financial but also cultural and legal. And that marriage itself may be changing—becoming something people do after they've tested compatibility through cohabitation, which might explain why the ones who do marry are happier.

  • The gap between when a marriage breaks down emotionally and when it ends legally is widening, with couples now waiting a median of 13 years before divorcing — up sharply from 8.9 years in 1985.
  • Financial reality is the sharpest brake: higher housing costs, childcare, legal aid cuts, and the sheer expense of splitting one household into two mean many couples cannot afford to separate even when they want to.
  • The 2022 no-fault divorce law, intended to ease the process, may paradoxically be encouraging delay — knowing the exit is available and blame-free makes it easier to wait rather than rush.
  • Women, who initiate most divorces and typically suffer the steeper financial fall, are increasingly spending years rebuilding careers and savings before formally ending marriages — a strategy born of necessity, not indecision.
  • Sociologists warn that marriage is quietly shifting from partnership to refuge, particularly for women, as successive economic and social crises erode the cultural confidence that once made leaving feel possible.

Across England, Wales, and much of the Western world, the formal dissolution of marriage is arriving later than ever before — not because unions are thriving longer, but because the distance between a relationship's quiet end and its legal conclusion has grown. New figures show the median marriage duration before divorce in England and Wales has reached 13 years, the highest since records began, a shift shaped by financial precarity, legal reform, and a cultural retreat into the perceived shelter of committed partnership. What the numbers reveal is less a story of marital success than one of careful, often painful calculation — particularly by women — about when, and whether, leaving can be afforded.

When Celia's marriage effectively ended, she did not file for divorce — not yet. She spent two years calculating, building her career, preparing for the financial fall that women, especially mothers, typically face when a marriage dissolves. Only then did she press, as she put it, 'eject.' Her story, it turns out, is increasingly common.

New figures from the Office for National Statistics confirm that marriages ending in divorce in England and Wales now last a median of 13 years — the longest duration since records began. In 1985, that figure was 8.9 years. Among couples who married in 2015, only 16.3% had divorced by their tenth anniversary, compared with 24.7% of those who married in 1995. The pattern extends across borders: the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, and Belgium all show similar trends toward longer marriages before formal dissolution.

Experts identify several overlapping causes, none decisive on its own. Financial pressure is central. Professor Emma Hitchings of the University of Bristol noted that while the 2022 no-fault divorce law simplified the legal process, it did nothing to ease the economic reality of separation — higher mortgages, childcare costs, and cuts to legal aid mean couples must calculate whether they can afford to part at all. The no-fault law itself may carry a counterintuitive effect: knowing the exit is available and uncomplicated may make it easier to wait rather than act.

Sociologist Julia Carter, who studies couples who remain together after separating emotionally, hears from people reluctant to introduce further instability into homes already buffeted by an uncertain world. She is direct about who is really doing the waiting: since women initiate most divorces, a rise in delayed divorce is, in practice, a rise in women delaying. She traces a cultural shift — the confident female empowerment messaging of the 1990s and 2000s has been eroded by successive crises, and marriage has re-embedded itself, particularly for women, as a source of long-term security.

Same-sex divorce figures tell a different story, though with the caveat that same-sex marriage has only existed in England and Wales since 2014. Median durations remain shorter, but researchers suggest same-sex couples may carry an additional weight when divorcing — a sense of having failed not just the relationship but a community that fought for decades to make that marriage possible.

Underlying all of this is a more fundamental shift: the rise of cohabitation has made marriage increasingly selective. With more than 90% of British couples now living together before marrying, those who proceed to marriage tend to be, research shows, the happiest and most compatible. The people now getting divorced are not those who rushed in and quickly regretted it. They are the ones who stayed, who tried — and who, when they finally decided to leave, had to work out whether they could afford to.

Celia waited two years after her marriage had effectively ended before she filed for divorce. She was not alone. New figures from the Office for National Statistics show that marriages ending in divorce in England and Wales now last a median of 13 years—the longest duration since records began. The shift is stark: in 1985, that median was 8.9 years. Among couples who married in 2015, only 16.3% had divorced by their tenth anniversary, compared with 24.7% of those who married in 1995.

Celia, an AI analyst, described her approach as methodical. She knew that women typically emerge from divorce in worse financial positions, especially when children are involved. So she spent years building her career before formally ending her 12-year marriage to Martyn. "I took the time I needed to turbocharge my career before pressing 'eject'," she said. Martyn, she noted, was mature enough to understand that waiting served everyone—the children, her, and him. What struck Celia most was how common this pattern had become among her friends. Across three separate friend groups spanning Europe and the United States, she knew couples who had divorced after marriages of a decade or more. "It was the oddest thing," she said.

The phenomenon is not confined to Britain. In the United States, the median length of marriages ending in divorce rose from 10 years in 2008 to 12 years in 2023, according to the Pew Research Center. Germany recorded an average of 14.6 years in 2025. The Netherlands reported 14.7 years. Belgium's figure was 12.03 years in 2024. While these countries measure and report divorce statistics differently, the broad pattern holds: marriages are lasting longer before they formally end.

Experts point to several overlapping explanations, though none can be confirmed as the primary driver. Financial pressure looms large. Professor Emma Hitchings of the University of Bristol law school, who leads the Fair Shares project studying how divorcing couples divide assets, noted that while no-fault divorce—introduced in 2022—made the legal process simpler, the actual separation of one household into two has not become easier. "Every financial aspect of divorce is harder," she said. Higher mortgage and tax rates, childcare costs, school fees, and the general rise in living expenses all factor in. Legal aid cuts for private family law proceedings in England and Wales have compounded the problem. Couples need time to calculate whether they can afford to separate at all.

The 2022 no-fault divorce law itself may play a counterintuitive role. Anne Barlow, professor emeritus of family law at the University of Exeter, observed that despite making divorce legally more straightforward, there has been no rush to use it. Dr. Alexander Maine, a senior lecturer at City Law School, suggested two possibilities: knowing you can leave might make it easier to wait, or the removal of the need to assign blame could allow couples to work through separation with less acrimony, reducing pressure to end the marriage immediately.

Broader social forces may also be at work. Julia Carter, a senior lecturer in sociology at the University of the West of England, Bristol, is researching couples who remain together after separation. She hears from people who, despite unhappy marriages, resist introducing further uncertainty into their homes—particularly when children are navigating an unstable world outside the family. Carter also emphasizes that women remain the primary initiators of divorce. "If we're saying that people are waiting later to get divorced, we're actually saying that women are waiting longer," she said. She traces a shift in cultural messaging: the 1990s and 2000s celebrated female empowerment and opportunity-grabbing, but successive crises—economic, environmental, political, and employment-related—have rolled back that positioning. Marriage has become embedded, particularly for women, as a refuge offering long-term stability and security. That embedding has reignited reluctance to pursue divorce.

Same-sex marriage statistics present a different picture. The median duration of same-sex marriages ending in divorce was 7.5 years for male couples and 6.6 years for female couples in 2025. These figures warrant caution: same-sex marriage was only introduced in England and Wales in 2014, so the pool of marriages old enough to have reached divorce remains young. Still, the 6.6-year figure for female couples is the highest recorded since the first same-sex divorces in 2015. Maine suggested that same-sex couples may approach marriage with particular seriousness because marriage equality required decades of campaigning. Divorce in the LGBT community can carry an additional weight—the sense of having failed not just the relationship but the entire community.

Professor Brianna Perelli-Harris of the University of Southampton, director of the UK Generations and Gender Survey, points to a more fundamental shift: the rise of cohabitation. More than 90% of people in Britain now cohabit before marrying. Her research across 10 European countries found that an increasing proportion of first partnerships end before marriage. "Marriage may therefore be becoming a more selective institution," she said. Couples who move in together and discover incompatibility can separate without ever marrying. Those who proceed to marriage are, her research shows, the couples who are happiest. The data suggests that the people now getting divorced are not the ones who rushed into marriage and quickly regretted it. They are the ones who stayed, who waited, who tried—and who, when they finally decided to leave, had to calculate whether they could afford to.

Every financial aspect of divorce is harder. From higher tax and mortgage rates, childcare and school fees – as well as the general cost of living.
— Professor Emma Hitchings, University of Bristol law school
Marriage may therefore be becoming a more selective institution. Couples who move in together and discover that the relationship does not work can separate without ever marrying.
— Professor Brianna Perelli-Harris, University of Southampton
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em The Guardian ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ