Macron's 'vandals pay' bill puts France's right to protest at risk, unions warn

Record numbers of protesters have been arrested, with extended police custody and bans on demonstrations following a day of looting and violence.
Vandals will pay and if it takes their whole life to pay, they will.
Marine Le Pen's rallying line in Orléans, where she launched her campaign before more than 8,000 people.
Mark

Why are unions so alarmed by this particular bill?

Mimi

Because of how liability is defined. You could owe up to €10,000 if you were demonstrating nearby or in the same group as the people who caused damage, even if you did nothing yourself.

Mark

So the worry is about deterrence, not just punishment.

Mimi

Yes. Éric Coquerel said people simply wouldn't risk coming out. Fabien Gay said no demonstration could happen again.

Luke

Those are opposition politicians' predictions, though. Nothing yet shows how courts would apply "nearby" or "same group." The effect on turnout is a forecast, not a finding.

Mark

And the government's case?

Mimi

Lecornu calls it absolutely essential after the looting and burning. The bill dates back to the clashes after PSG's win over Arsenal in May.

Mark

Where does Le Pen fit?

Mimi

Her party claims the idea as its own, and she launched her campaign in Orléans on it. She is the frontrunner for next spring.

Luke

Careful, though. The reporting says her frontrunner status was boosted, not by how much. And the RN's claim of authorship is its own claim, not something established.

Mark

What is Slama's warning?

Mimi

That the restrictive decrees are unprecedented and would let a future far-right government go further without changing the law.

Luke

Which is a legal scholar's reading of a possible future. What's unknown is whether the Senate passes the bill, and in what form.

  • A bill fast-tracked through Paris would make protesters liable for up to €10,000 in damage they did not personally cause.
  • Unions, the Human Rights League and the far left warn that the law could end street demonstrations altogether.
  • Record arrests, extended police custody and bans on gatherings have turned weekend marches into a test of who may speak in public.
  • The Senate takes up the bill this week, with Prime Minister Lecornu meeting high-school protest leaders on Monday to try to defuse the blockades.

Across France, a familiar argument about who should answer for the damage done in the street has become a question about the street itself. A government nearing the end of its term wants demonstrators to share liability for destruction they may not have committed, while critics hear in that rule an old republic's right to gather being quietly narrowed. Whether the law passes, and what the country decides a protest is worth, will shape how its citizens are heard in the years ahead.

On a Sunday in Orléans, more than 8,000 people cheered as Marine Le Pen opened her presidential campaign with a promise to bring back order to France. Her line about vandals drew the loudest applause: if it takes their whole lives to pay, they will spend their whole lives paying. That same idea now sits at the heart of a legal fight in Paris over who must pay when a demonstration turns destructive.

President Emmanuel Macron's government is pushing a vandals-pay bill that would let authorities hold a street protester liable for up to €10,000 in damage, even without having caused it, if they were demonstrating nearby or in the same group as those who did. The bill also widens the use of drones over protests. It was drafted after violent clashes following Paris Saint-Germain's Champions League win in May, and after a recent day of looting and fires that marred largely peaceful marches. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu calls it absolutely essential.

The unrest is layered. High-school students have blockaded schools for more than a month over teacher shortages and crumbling buildings, and unions and gilets jaunes protesters have joined them, widening the dispute to living costs and public services. Officials have answered with bans on gatherings in front of schools and in city centres, curfews, and record-length police custody, and some demonstrations deemed illegitimate were prohibited, angering many who came out to defend the right to protest itself.

Opponents say the bill would end that tradition. Critics from the left, including unions and the Human Rights League, call it a serious attack on the freedom to demonstrate. The National Rally claims the idea as its own and gains ground as its leader presents herself as the candidate of order. Legal scholars warn that the emergency-style decrees could outlast this government.

The Senate debates the bill within days, and Lecornu meets high-school representatives on Monday, under pressure to answer their demands with funding and repairs before the blockades harden further.

On Sunday in Orléans, more than 8,000 people cheered as Marine Le Pen launched her presidential campaign with a promise to "bring back order to France." Her line about vandals drew the loudest response: if it takes their whole lives to pay, she said, then they will spend their whole lives paying. The same idea is now at the center of a legal fight in Paris over who can be made to pay when a demonstration turns destructive.

The government of President Emmanuel Macron, who leaves office next spring, is fast-tracking a "vandals pay" bill. Under it, a person at a street protest could be held liable for up to €10,000 in damage even if they did not cause it, provided they were still demonstrating nearby or were part of the same group as the people who did. The bill also expands the use of drones over protests. The Senate is due to debate it this week.

The text was first prepared after violent clashes that followed Paris Saint-Germain's Champions League victory over Arsenal in May. Prime minister Sébastien Lecornu now calls it "absolutely essential" after the looting and burning seen at recent demonstrations across France. Earlier this month the country had one of its worst days of violence in years, when largely peaceful marches were marred by looting, fires and vandalism of state buildings.

That unrest sits on top of a longer one. For more than a month, high-school students have blockaded schools, demanding a response to teacher absences, repairs to decrepit buildings and changes to the university applications platform. Trade unions and gilets jaunes protesters have since joined the street demonstrations, widening the dispute to the cost of living and public services.

Authorities have answered with restrictions. Macron has not declared a state of emergency, but the government and local authorities have banned gatherings in front of schools and demonstrations in city centres, imposed curfews in some places, and extended police custody for a record number of arrests. Non-union demonstrations that the government deemed "illegitimate" have been banned, which provoked widespread anger at this weekend's marches. Many of those who turned out said they came to defend the right to protest itself, a tool French citizens have long used to make themselves heard by a centralised state, from pension changes to same-sex marriage.

Opponents say the bill would end that tradition. Éric Coquerel of Jean-Luc Mélenchon's La France Insoumise said it would mean the end of street demonstrations, because people would not risk being charged up to €10,000 for damage they had not done. Communist senator Fabien Gay told Public Sénat that no demonstration could take place again in the country. In an open letter to Le Monde, left-leaning unions and the Human Rights League called the law unfair, a serious attack on the freedom to demonstrate, and urged that it be abandoned or risk a major step back for the rule of law.

The politics are awkward for the government. Le Pen's National Rally says the bill was originally its idea, and she has used the crisis to stress her law-and-order credentials and back the police, boosting her frontrunner status for next spring's election. She has appealed her embezzlement conviction over European parliament funds to France's highest court. Serge Slama, a public law professor at Université Grenoble Alpes, told Télérama the decrees restricting public liberties were unprecedented, and warned they would help a far-right government impose further crackdowns without changing the law.

On Monday, Lecornu will meet representatives of the protesting high-schoolers, under pressure to answer their demands with funding and school repairs and so head off further blockades. The Senate debate follows within days.

No demonstration could take place again in our country.
— Fabien Gay, Communist senator, on Public Sénat
The decrees restricting public liberties are unprecedented and would benefit the far right if it won next year's elections.
— Serge Slama, public law professor, Université Grenoble Alpes (paraphrased)
Contattaci Domande frequenti