Lutnick Must Go: Former NSC Official Says Commerce Chief Enabled Nvidia Chip Smuggling to China

One of the largest transfers of controlled technology to an adversary in history
McGuire's closing judgment on what he says Commerce's non-enforcement of chip export controls enabled.
Mark

Why does this op-ed link a personal scandal to export policy?

Mimi

McGuire argues the affair exposed Mr. Huang, but the larger failure was upstream. He says Commerce chose not to enforce the controls that would have made diversion harder.

Mark

What is the central policy charge?

Mimi

That Lutnick let the January 2025 Biden-era licensing rules lapse in practice, announced in May 2025 that they wouldn't be enforced, and never issued a replacement.

Luke

Worth saying plainly: this is one author's opinion. Which parts are documented and which are inference?

Mimi

The $60 billion is Taiwanese customs data, but McGuire says the chips were 'most likely' shipped to those countries and 'probably' diverted. The inference is in the wording.

Luke

And the $7 billion for Megaspeed is described as reported, with no source named. The DayOne chip count is his own calculation from SEC filings.

Mark

What about the Kessler allegation?

Mimi

It's reported that he discussed the investigation with Nvidia's general counsel and that it halted soon after. The sequence is stated, but causation isn't established.

Luke

Right. We also don't have Lutnick's or Commerce's response here, and the Huang resignation details come from the piece itself.

Mark

What should a reader watch?

Mimi

Whether Megaspeed lands on the entity list, and whether Congress moves the three bills.

  • A rule meant to stop AI chips from flowing to China was allowed to lapse, and no replacement has ever appeared.
  • Tens of billions of dollars in advanced chips reportedly landed in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand, raising alarms about where they finally went.
  • An investigation into the smuggling network Megaspeed was reportedly halted after a sensitive conversation with Nvidia's legal chief.
  • Calls are mounting for the Commerce Secretary to resign while three bipartisan bills wait in Congress to tighten the rules.

There are moments when a single resignation reveals a much older question about who guards the gates of power. A former national security official now argues that the chips at the heart of the modern economy were allowed to drift past the limits set to protect them, and that the man charged with holding those limits chose patience over enforcement. Whether his account is complete, and whether the consequences he describes will follow, remains for the public and for Congress to weigh.

A former National Security Council official, now a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, has written a pointed opinion essay arguing that a second scandal is forming at the Department of Commerce. His target is Secretary Howard Lutnick, whom he holds responsible for failing to enforce the rules that keep advanced AI chips out of Chinese hands. The essay follows the resignation of Nvidia's chief executive, Jensen Huang, after an admitted affair with a woman alleged to be a Chinese spy. This is an argument piece, and its claims belong to the author.

The story begins in early 2025, when the Biden administration imposed controls requiring export licenses for large AI chip purchases by unvetted buyers. According to the author, Mr. Lutnick never let those rules take effect, and in May 2025 Commerce said it would not enforce them and would later replace them with other measures. No replacement was ever published, and the old rules were never formally rescinded. Diversion risk, he argues, was left to companies like Nvidia and server makers.

The author cites Taiwanese customs data showing more than $60 billion in AI chips likely shipped to Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand over 2025 and 2026. He puts the reported Megaspeed smuggling at $7 billion and describes a Singapore data center firm with ties to Chinese military-linked customers that may be building capacity for over 1.5 million advanced chips. He also notes that Commerce has added no company to its trade blacklist in more than a year.

The most striking detail concerns Megaspeed. Commerce investigators reportedly suspected Chinese destinations for its chips, yet the company is still not on the entity list, and the investigation was halted soon after a deputy discussed it with Nvidia's general counsel. The department has not publicly explained why. China rejects the espionage claims.

The author's prescriptions are clear: Mr. Lutnick should resign, enforcement should resume, the loophole allowing remote chip rentals should close, and Congress should pass the AI Overwatch, MATCH and Chip Security Acts. The next signals will be whether those bills move and whether Megaspeed finally appears on the list.

On Thursday, Jensen Huang stepped down as head of Nvidia, one of the most valuable companies in the world. His resignation followed his admission of an extramarital affair with a woman alleged to be a Chinese spy. Chris McGuire, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, argues in a New York Times opinion essay that a second scandal is taking shape at the Department of Commerce, and that its secretary, Howard Lutnick, bears nearly as much responsibility for the crisis as Mr. Huang does. This is an argument piece, and the claims below are McGuire's.

McGuire served on the National Security Council, where he oversaw export controls and artificial intelligence policy. He writes that Nvidia's most advanced chips, the ones that drive AI, are considered so critical to national security that they cannot be sold to Chinese companies. He calls Mr. Huang's judgment terrible, given that the woman, Alice Huang, no relation, is a Megaspeed executive suspected of ties to Chinese intelligence, and Megaspeed is believed to be diverting banned Nvidia chips to China. China has rejected the espionage claims. McGuire's point is that Mr. Lutnick's decision not to enforce anti-smuggling export controls helped make Mr. Huang a potential target.

The timeline starts in January 2025, when the Biden administration imposed new controls aimed at chip smuggling. Unvetted companies in most countries would have needed a Commerce Department export license before making any large AI chip purchase. Mr. Lutnick took office the next month, and McGuire says he never let the rules take effect. Mr. Huang was by then building a close relationship with the new president and with Mr. Lutnick, and Nvidia long maintained there was no evidence restricted chips were being diverted to China. In May 2025, Commerce announced it would not enforce the controls and said it would eventually replace them with other measures.

According to McGuire, no replacement rule was ever published, and the Biden-era controls were never formally rescinded. In practice, he writes, Mr. Lutnick left the vetting of diversion risk to the private sector, including Nvidia and AI server suppliers such as Supermicro.

He points to Taiwanese customs data showing that from 2025 to 2026, more than $60 billion worth of AI chips were most likely shipped to Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand, which makes those three relatively small countries among the largest AI chip importers in the world. Some went to U.S.-owned data centers, he says, but many probably reached companies that passed them on to China. Commerce investigators reportedly suspected China was the final destination of Megaspeed's chips, and the company was found in late 2025 to have kept strong ties to China. McGuire puts the reported Megaspeed smuggling at $7 billion, which he calls likely the tip of the iceberg. He notes that China is months, not years, behind the United States in AI.

He also describes a business built on the gaps. DayOne, a Singapore-based data center company spun out of a China-based company in 2025, has filed to go public on Nasdaq. McGuire's calculations from its SEC filings suggest it is building capacity for more than 1.5 million of the most advanced Nvidia chips in Southeast Asia. It exploits a loophole that lets Chinese firms use AI chips housed in data centers outside China. ByteDance and its affiliates supply 70 percent of its revenue, its customers include at least two companies the U.S. government designates as Chinese Military Companies, and its chief executive previously worked for the company it was spun out of.

McGuire adds that Mr. Lutnick has not put a single company on the entity list, Commerce's trade blacklist, in over a year, the longest gap in 18 years. Mr. Lutnick was reportedly briefed in May 2026 on Mr. Huang's relationship with Alice Huang and her suspected intelligence ties. He is reportedly still resisting putting Megaspeed on the list despite urging from other administration members, including President Trump, and Nvidia's website still calls Megaspeed an official cloud partner. McGuire also reports that in May 2025 Jeff Kessler, a top Lutnick deputy overseeing export controls, discussed the ongoing Megaspeed investigation with Nvidia's general counsel, which he calls highly unusual. The department halted the investigation soon after.

His prescriptions: Mr. Lutnick should resign, Commerce should enforce the remaining anti-smuggling rules or replace them with stricter ones, and it should close the loophole letting Chinese firms rent chips they cannot legally buy. Congress, he says, should pass three pending bipartisan bills, the AI Overwatch Act, the MATCH Act and the Chip Security Act, and investigate why Mr. Lutnick and Mr. Kessler did not act. The next signals to watch are whether those bills move and whether Megaspeed is added to the entity list.

Lutnick must resign so the cleanup can commence.
— Chris McGuire, Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow and former NSC official
Contattaci Domande frequenti