In the long history of sport's uneasy relationship with power, a moment has arrived where a British political party is asking whether football's highest institution has forfeited its right to govern. The Liberal Democrats, led by Sir Ed Davey, have called on England's Football Association and Uefa to withdraw from Fifa entirely, citing a pattern of political interference, commercial excess, and governance failures under Gianni Infantino. The proposal carries an almost mythic tension: the very act of leaving would cost England its place at the World Cup, yet its advocates argue that remaining i
Lib Dems call for FA and Uefa to quit Fifa over governance crisis
Fifa no longer serves the game or its supporters
Mark
Why would the Lib Dems suddenly care about Fifa governance? This seems like an odd political priority.
Mimi
It's not really sudden. Fifa's decisions have become so visible and so unpopular that ignoring them looks like complicity. When an American player's ban gets overturned after a presidential phone call, when tickets cost hundreds of pounds, when a referee gets blocked from entering a country — these aren't abstract governance failures. Fans see them. Politicians see them.
Mark
But if England withdrew, they'd lose the World Cup. That's not a realistic threat, is it?
Mimi
No, which is exactly why Davey is calling for coordinated action. A single country leaving would be suicide. But if Uefa and other confederations moved together, suddenly you have leverage. That's the theory, anyway.
Mark
Do you think Infantino actually cares about this pressure?
Mimi
He's expected to win a fourth term regardless. So either he doesn't care, or he's confident enough in his support that criticism doesn't move him. The real question is whether this plants a seed for the next crisis — whether enough people start asking if the system itself is broken.
Mark
What would a replacement even look like?
Mimi
That's the hard part. Nobody's saying. You'd need a governing body that's transparent, accountable, and genuinely independent from commercial interests. But football is worth billions. Creating something that resists that kind of money is almost impossible.
Mark
So this is more about making a statement than expecting change?
Mimi
For now, yes. But statements matter. They shift what's considered acceptable. A few years ago, calling for Fifa's dissolution would have sounded fringe. Now it's coming from a major political party.
The Pulse
- Fifa's credibility has fractured visibly — a player ban reversed after a presidential phone call, a referee turned away at a border, and advertising revenue quietly harvested from water breaks — each incident landing like a stone in still water.
- Uefa has already declared a red line crossed, calling Fifa's Trump-linked intervention 'unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable,' signalling that Europe's football establishment is no longer willing to absorb every controversy in silence.
- The Liberal Democrats are pushing further than any mainstream political voice has gone, demanding not reform but dissolution — a clean break and the construction of an entirely new governing body built around transparency and fans.
- The cost of exit is staggering: England would forfeit World Cup eligibility, a consequence so grave it transforms the proposal from policy into provocation — and perhaps that is precisely the point.
- Infantino, expected to extend his presidency to 2031, appears insulated by the loyalty of 211 member associations, leaving critics to wonder whether institutional pressure can ever outweigh institutional inertia.
In the long history of sport's uneasy relationship with power, a moment has arrived where a British political party is asking whether football's highest institution has forfeited its right to govern. The Liberal Democrats, led by Sir Ed Davey, have called on England's Football Association and Uefa to withdraw from Fifa entirely, citing a pattern of political interference, commercial excess, and governance failures under Gianni Infantino. The proposal carries an almost mythic tension: the very act of leaving would cost England its place at the World Cup, yet its advocates argue that remaining is its own form of surrender.
Sir Ed Davey made a striking intervention this week, calling on the English FA and European football bodies to withdraw from Fifa and build an entirely new governing body from scratch. The Liberal Democrat leader argued that Fifa, under Gianni Infantino, has become so entangled in commercial interests and political interference that it no longer deserves its authority over the world's most popular sport.
The call came against a backdrop of compounding controversies. Fifa overturned a match ban for an American player following intervention from President Donald Trump — a decision Uefa condemned as 'unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable.' Around the same time, the governing body drew criticism for a dynamic ticket pricing system that has priced ordinary fans out of World Cup matches, for approving hydration breaks that could generate close to £189 million in additional advertising revenue, and for failing to adequately respond when Somali referee Omar Artan was denied entry to the United States to officiate at the tournament.
Lib Dem culture spokesperson Anna Sabine described Fifa as behaving 'more like a closed-shop cartel than a neutral global sporting body,' and argued that allowing Infantino a fourth presidential term — extending to 2031 — would mean choosing comfort over accountability. Infantino has defended his record, pointing to global expansion of the game and increased funding for member associations, but critics say the price has been a concentration of power and a steady erosion of governance standards.
The practical consequences of the Liberal Democrats' proposal are severe. Withdrawal from Fifa would strip England of World Cup eligibility — a cost so enormous it makes the suggestion feel more like a moral ultimatum than a workable policy. Yet that may be the intention. The Football Action Network's Niall Couper said 'nothing should be off the table' if Fifa refuses to reform. With Infantino widely expected to secure enough support for another term, the deeper question is whether this wave of criticism will genuinely shift football's power structure — or simply be absorbed, as so many waves before it have been.
Sir Ed Davey stood up this week with a radical proposal: English football should walk away from Fifa entirely. The Liberal Democrat leader, speaking for his party, said the world's football governing body has become so corrupted by commercial interests and political meddling that it no longer deserves to exist. Fifa, he argued, is "destroying the integrity of the beautiful game" — and the only solution is for the English FA and European football bodies to coordinate a complete exit and build something new from scratch.
The timing of the call reflects a cascade of recent decisions that have shaken confidence in Gianni Infantino's leadership. Most dramatically, Fifa overturned a match ban for an American player after intervention from US President Donald Trump. That reversal alone prompted Uefa, Europe's governing body, to declare that a red line had been crossed — calling the decision "unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable." But the problems run deeper. Fifa has faced sustained criticism over its dynamic pricing system for World Cup tickets, which has made matches prohibitively expensive for ordinary fans. The governing body has also approved hydration breaks during matches that could generate up to £189 million in additional advertising revenue. And when Somali referee Omar Artan was denied entry to the United States to officiate at the tournament, Fifa's response drew further condemnation.
The Liberal Democrats framed these incidents as symptoms of a body that has gone too far. Anna Sabine, the party's spokesperson for culture, media and sport, said Fifa now behaves "more like a closed-shop cartel than a neutral global sporting body." She argued that by allowing Infantino to secure a fourth presidential term — which would extend his tenure until 2031 — football's governing bodies are choosing comfort over reform. "Fans deserve transparency and integrity, not another four years of unchecked cronyism," Sabine said.
Infantino has defended the ticket pricing, noting that costs align with other major American sporting events. His supporters point to genuine achievements during his presidency: he has expanded the game globally and increased funding flowing to member associations. But critics argue the cost has been steep. They say he has concentrated power in his own hands, prioritized commercial growth over fan experience, and allowed governance standards to deteriorate. Since his election in 2016, his tenure has been marked by controversy.
The practical stakes of the Liberal Democrats' proposal are enormous. There are 211 national football associations in Fifa. If England's FA withdrew, the country would lose its eligibility to compete in the World Cup — a consequence so severe that it seems almost unthinkable. Yet Davey argued this is precisely why coordinated action matters. He called on the FA and other European bodies to work together "to build a clean, transparent governing body that puts fans first." The Football Action Network, a campaign group, echoed the sentiment, with chair Niall Couper saying that "nothing should be off the table if the game's global governing body refuses to reform."
Infantino is widely expected to have enough support from football associations to secure that fourth term. The question now is whether the pressure from Uefa, the Liberal Democrats, and fan advocacy groups will shift the calculation — or whether football's power structure will simply absorb the criticism and move forward as it has before.
Notable Quotes
Fifa behaves more like a closed-shop cartel than a neutral global sporting body— Anna Sabine, Liberal Democrat Spokesperson for Culture, Media and Sport
The decision not to uphold the ban had crossed a red line and was unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable— Uefa, Europe's football governing body, on Fifa's reversal of a player ban
Want the full story?
Read the original at BBC News ↗
Sports