Large Israeli Study Finds Contemporary Hormone Therapy Not Linked to Heart Risk in Women 45 to 59

Close results aren't proof, but fear has outlasted the evidence behind it
Among 52,330 Israeli women, heart events, clots and early deaths were nearly identical with or without HRT.
Mark

Why does a study like this matter if the FDA already dropped the boxed warnings last year?

Mimi

Because fear outlasts labels. Arbel says heart concerns are among the most common reasons women decline HRT, and why some clinicians hesitate to offer it.

Luke

Worth noting the FDA removal and this study point the same direction, but this one is preliminary and will be presented in Chicago, not yet a finished verdict.

Mark

What are the numbers actually showing?

Mimi

Heart events in 4.4% of the HRT group and 4.6% of the comparison group. Death before 80 was 1.3% versus 1.2%. Clots were 0.33% in both.

Luke

Those are close, yes. But close isn't proof of safety. It's observational, so it can't establish cause.

Mark

What might be hiding underneath?

Mimi

The records may miss exercise, diet, other health conditions and how severe symptoms were. Those could differ between the groups.

Luke

And women were grouped by their first therapy only. Anyone who switched formulations later isn't reflected, so we can't say much about changes over time.

Mark

Who does this apply to?

Mimi

Women 45 to 59 with no prior heart disease, clots or cancer. Rosen framed it as healthy women starting around menopause.

Luke

Right, nothing here speaks to women who start later or who already have cardiovascular disease.

  • A long-standing fear that hormone therapy harms the heart has kept many women from relief and kept some clinicians hesitant to offer it.
  • A study of 52,330 Israeli women tracked for up to 23 years found heart events, clots and early deaths nearly identical between users and non-users.
  • Researchers cannot yet prove cause, since diet, exercise and symptom severity may have differed between the two groups.
  • The findings head to the AHA Scientific Sessions in Chicago on November 6-9, where they will test how far today's reassurance can travel into clinic conversations.

Across a long stretch of time, a large body of women in Israel has offered a quiet answer to a question that has unsettled many in the middle of life: whether the hormones once used to ease the upheaval of menopause quietly carry a hidden cost to the heart. Following tens of thousands of records over roughly twelve years, researchers found no sign that today's therapies raised rates of heart attack, stroke, blood clots or early death among women who began treatment between their mid-forties and late fifties. The evidence is observational and not yet peer-reviewed in its final form, so it illuminates rather than settles the matter, and it will be weighed in Chicago this November alongside the many voices shaping how women and their physicians choose.

A study of 52,330 women in Israel, followed for an average of twelve years, has found no sign that modern hormone replacement therapy raises the risk of heart attack, stroke, blood clots or early death in women who start it between ages 45 and 59. The work is preliminary and independent, and it will be presented at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026 in Chicago, November 6-9.

The lead researcher, Ronen Arbel, Ph.D., works with Clalit Health Services in Tel Aviv and Sapir College's research lab. He notes that fear for the heart is among the most common reasons women decline hormone therapy, and a reason some health professionals hesitate to offer it. That fear has a history: earlier randomized trials linked HRT to cardiovascular harm, though their results were mixed, and much of that evidence involved older formulations, higher doses and women who started long after menopause.

The researchers compared women who started HRT with women who had seen a gynecologist but never began it, matching the two groups on age, blood pressure, cholesterol, diabetes, smoking and socioeconomic status. Heart attack or related heart disease occurred in 4.4% of users and 4.6% of non-users. Early death was 1.3% versus 1.2%, and clots affected 0.33% in each group. Results held across formulations and delivery routes.

Arbel said that for women with no prior heart disease or clots, current therapies do not appear to raise these risks, even after long-term use. Stacey E. Rosen, M.D., a past AHA volunteer president not involved in the study, said the work adds to growing evidence and can support better-informed conversations between women and their care teams.

The limits remain plain. As an observational study, it cannot prove a direct link or the lack of one, and unrecorded differences in exercise, diet or symptom severity may matter. Women were grouped by their first therapy, so later changes were not counted. Until the Chicago presentation and further scrutiny, the findings remain preliminary.

A study of 52,330 women in Israel, followed for an average of 12 years, has found no sign that modern hormone replacement therapy raises the risk of heart attack, stroke, blood clots or early death in women who start it between the ages of 45 and 59. The work is preliminary and independent, and it will be presented at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026, held Nov. 6-9 in Chicago.

The lead researcher, Ronen Arbel, Ph.D., works in the community medical services division of Clalit Health Services in Tel Aviv and with Sapir College's Maximizing Health Outcomes Research Lab in Sderot. He says worry about the heart is among the most common reasons women decline hormone therapy for menopause symptoms, and a reason some health professionals hesitate to offer it.

That worry has a history. Earlier randomized trials linked HRT to cardiovascular harm, though their results were mixed. Much of that evidence came from older formulations no longer in common use, given at higher doses, and to women who began treatment long after menopause. Current guidance from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is to start within 10 years of menopause onset and before age 60. In November 2025, the FDA removed the boxed warnings from HRT products after a review of current data that found no increased risk of cardiovascular disease, breast cancer or dementia.

The researchers used Clalit Health Services records for women aged 45 to 59 with no history of heart disease, blood clots or cancer. Half had started HRT, mostly oral or transdermal patch. The other half had recently seen a gynecologist but did not begin HRT, and stayed off it throughout the study. The two groups were matched on age, BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol, diabetes diagnosis, smoking status and socioeconomic status. Records were tracked for up to 23 years.

The outcomes were close. Heart attack, stroke or related heart disease occurred in 2,311 women on HRT (4.4%) and 2,383 women not on it (4.6%). Death before age 80 occurred in 659 women on HRT (1.3%) and 653 women not on it (1.2%). Blood clots affected 0.33% of each group: 174 women in the HRT group and 175 in the comparison group. Results were similar across formulations and across oral, patch and gel routes.

"Our results indicate that, for women in their mid-forties to late fifties with no history of heart disease or blood clots, the currently available hormone therapies prescribed to manage menopause symptoms do not appear to raise the risk of heart attack, stroke, clots or early death, even after long-term use," Arbel said.

Stacey E. Rosen, M.D., a past volunteer president of the American Heart Association (2025-2026) who was not involved in the research, said the study adds to growing evidence that today's options may not raise the risk of heart disease, stroke or blood clots for healthy women who begin treatment around menopause. Rosen, who is executive director of the Katz Institute for Women's Health and senior vice president of women's health at Northwell Health in New York City, said the findings can support better-informed conversations between women and their care teams.

The limits are plain. This is an observational study, so it cannot prove a direct link, or lack of one, between HRT and heart health. The records may not capture differences between the groups in exercise, diet, other health conditions or the severity of menopause symptoms. Women were also grouped by the first type of hormone therapy they used, so later changes in type or formulation were not counted. The Chicago presentation is the next step, and the findings remain preliminary until then.

For women in their mid-forties to late fifties with no history of heart disease or blood clots, currently available hormone therapies do not appear to raise the risk of heart attack, stroke, clots or early death, even after long-term use.
— Ronen Arbel, Ph.D., Clalit Health Services
The study adds to growing evidence that today's hormone therapy may not increase heart disease, stroke or clot risk for healthy women starting around menopause.
— Stacey E. Rosen, M.D., Northwell Health (not involved in the study)
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur News-Medical ↗
Nous contacter FAQ