Sixty-five million years ago, in the aftermath of the great extinction that ended the age of dinosaurs, Europe quietly became the birthplace of one of nature's most remarkable experiments in flight. A new study combining genetic sequencing with fossil evidence has redrawn the origin map of bats, placing their emergence in the early Paleocene epoch on a continent long overlooked as a cradle of mammalian innovation. The finding does not merely revise bat biology — it invites a broader reckoning with how confidently we have drawn the geographic chapters of life's long story.
Landmark study reveals bats originated in Europe 65 million years ago
Bats originated in Europe, rewriting the evolutionary history of mammals
Mark
So this study is saying bats came from Europe 65 million years ago. How confident are we in that number?
Mimi
The researchers used reference genomes—genetic blueprints from living bats—and cross-referenced them with fossil evidence. That dual approach is what gives the finding its weight. The 65 million year mark aligns with the early Paleocene, right after the dinosaurs went extinct.
Luke
But I want to be clear: is that 65 million years a precise measurement, or is it a range? Paleontology often works in windows of time, not exact dates.
Mimi
Fair point. The fossil record is incomplete, and genetic clocks have margins of error. What the study establishes is that bats originated in Europe during the early Paleocene—that's the solid finding.
Mark
And this changes what we thought before?
Mimi
Yes. The conventional wisdom had bats emerging elsewhere, or at least left it ambiguous. This work, by combining genomes with fossils, actually pins down a location and a timeframe.
Luke
What's the sample size here? How many bat species' genomes did they sequence, and how many fossils did they examine?
Mimi
The source material doesn't specify those numbers, which is a gap. But the methodology—reference genomes plus fossil phylogeny—is sound enough that major publications like Nature and The New York Times covered it.
Mark
What happens next? Does this change how we understand other mammals?
Mimi
That's the real question. If bats originated in Europe, it suggests other mammalian orders might have unexpected origins too. It's a template for rethinking the whole geographic story of mammalian evolution.
Luke
And the dispersal from Europe to everywhere else—is that documented in the fossil record, or is that inferred from the genetic data?
Mimi
The study uses both to reconstruct biogeography—where species were when. But again, the source doesn't break down which conclusions rest on which evidence.
Mark
So we know bats came from Europe, we know they spread globally, and we know they adapted to nearly every habitat except Antarctica. That's the story.
Mimi
That's the story. And it's a story that couldn't be told clearly until someone combined the tools to see it.
O Pulso
- Decades of scientific consensus about bat origins have been overturned in a single study, exposing how much the fossil record's silence can mislead even careful researchers.
- The tension lies not just in a revised birthplace, but in what it demands: the entire map of how modern mammalian families spread across the planet may need to be redrawn.
- Researchers broke the methodological deadlock by fusing reference genome analysis with paleontological data, a dual approach powerful enough to reveal evolutionary connections that neither discipline could find alone.
- Bats, it now appears, were among the first mammals to seize the ecological vacuum left by the dinosaurs, evolving true flight in early Paleocene Europe before dispersing into nearly every habitat on Earth.
- The study lands as an open provocation to the field — if bats originated somewhere so unexpected, which other major mammalian orders are quietly waiting to surprise us?
Sixty-five million years ago, in the aftermath of the great extinction that ended the age of dinosaurs, Europe quietly became the birthplace of one of nature's most remarkable experiments in flight. A new study combining genetic sequencing with fossil evidence has redrawn the origin map of bats, placing their emergence in the early Paleocene epoch on a continent long overlooked as a cradle of mammalian innovation. The finding does not merely revise bat biology — it invites a broader reckoning with how confidently we have drawn the geographic chapters of life's long story.
A new study has fundamentally changed what scientists thought they knew about the origins of bats. By combining genetic sequencing with fossil evidence, researchers have traced bat evolution back 65 million years to Europe — a conclusion that challenges long-held assumptions about mammalian history and the geography of life's diversification.
For decades, the true birthplace of bats remained obscured by gaps in the fossil record and the limits of earlier genetic tools. This latest research reconstructs the bat family tree using reference genomes alongside paleontological data, pointing to the early Paleocene epoch in Europe as the cradle of bat evolution. The methodology marks a genuine advance: integrating both genomic and fossil evidence produced a more complete picture of bat phylogeny and biogeography than either approach had achieved in isolation.
The Paleocene, the epoch immediately following the extinction of the dinosaurs, was a period of rapid mammalian diversification. Bats appear to have been among its earliest beneficiaries, evolving in Europe during this window of ecological opportunity and eventually dispersing across continents into the roughly 1,400 species alive today. That they developed true flight — a capability unique among mammals — during this formative period in Europe adds another layer of significance to the finding.
The implications extend well beyond bat biology. Europe has rarely featured in conventional accounts of where major mammalian groups originated, and this discovery suggests those accounts may be incomplete. Other orders could have similarly unexpected birthplaces, waiting to be uncovered through the same rigorous combination of genomic and fossil analysis. The study closes one chapter of evolutionary history while opening several others, raising new questions about how early Paleocene Europe's climate and geography made it such fertile ground for mammalian innovation.
A new study has fundamentally altered what scientists thought they knew about where bats came from. Using a combination of genetic sequencing and fossil evidence, researchers have traced the origin of bats back 65 million years to Europe—a finding that upends the conventional understanding of how mammals evolved and spread across the planet.
For decades, the prevailing assumption held that bats emerged elsewhere, their true birthplace obscured by gaps in the fossil record and the limitations of earlier genetic analysis. But this latest work, which reconstructs the family tree of bats through reference genomes and paleontological data, points instead to the early Paleocene epoch in Europe as the cradle of bat evolution. The implications ripple outward: if bats originated there, then the story of how modern mammalian families dispersed globally and adapted to radically different environments must be rewritten.
The research methodology represents a significant advance in how scientists approach deep evolutionary questions. Rather than relying on genetics alone or fossils in isolation, the team integrated both sources of evidence, allowing them to build a more complete picture of bat phylogeny—the branching pattern of their evolutionary relationships—and biogeography, the geographic distribution of species across time. This dual approach has proven more powerful than either method alone, revealing connections and timelines that previous studies had missed.
The Paleocene, the geological epoch immediately following the extinction of the dinosaurs, was a period of rapid mammalian diversification. Bats, it now appears, were among the early beneficiaries of that opening. They evolved in Europe during this window of opportunity, developing the adaptations that would eventually allow them to colonize nearly every terrestrial habitat on Earth except Antarctica. From their European origins, they dispersed across continents and oceans, diversifying into the roughly 1,400 species alive today.
This discovery carries weight beyond the narrow confines of bat biology. Mammals as a whole have a geographic origin story, and that story has long been assumed to center on other regions. By establishing Europe as the birthplace of bats—one of the most successful and diverse mammalian orders—the study suggests that the conventional maps of mammalian evolution may need redrawing. Other major groups may have similarly unexpected origins, waiting for researchers to uncover them through the same combination of genomic and fossil evidence.
The work also illuminates how species adapt to ecological niches. Bats are the only mammals capable of true flight, a trait that emerged during their early evolution in Europe. Understanding when and where that adaptation took hold provides clues to how environmental pressures shape the development of radical new capabilities. The fossil record, combined with genetic data, now tells a clearer story of that transformation.
As researchers continue to refine their understanding of bat origins and dispersal, the broader implications for mammalian biogeography will likely become clearer. The study opens new questions: Which other mammalian orders might have originated in unexpected places? How did climate and geography in the early Paleocene Europe facilitate the emergence of such a successful group? The answers will require the same rigorous combination of methods that produced this landmark finding.
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em Google News ↗
General News