On a Tuesday in late October, the leaders of Finland and Norway spent ninety minutes on the telephone with Vladimir Putin, reaching for a way through a peace process that has stalled for years under the weight of mistrust. They framed the call as an attempt to open a door that Europe has largely watched others walk through, and they did so with the blessing of Kyiv, which saw in it a chance to give Europe a fresh role. Yet the Kremlin's account of the conversation returned to old grievances about NATO and the EU, and across the continent several capitals met the gesture with suspicion, asking
Kyiv Seeks 'New Momentum' as Nordic Leaders Brief Putin Call Amid European Scepticism
Only increased pressure on Russia will make it take peace negotiations seriously.
Why does a phone call between two Nordic leaders and Putin matter this much?
Because it reopens a European channel when talks have stalled. Sybiha said Kyiv wants new momentum and a new European role, and that this call was coordinated with Ukraine.
Worth separating what's confirmed. The ninety minutes and the coordination claim are stated by Stubb, Støre and Sybiha. We only have the Kremlin readout for Putin's side.
And that readout was hard-line?
Yes. It blamed the EU and Nato for confrontational policies and demanded recognition of Russia's legitimate interests. Støre himself admitted significant differences remain.
So 'momentum' is Kyiv's hope, not an outcome. Nothing in the reporting says Russia moved.
Why are Denmark, Estonia, Poland and Sweden uneasy?
Estonia's Tsahkna argues only pressure works. Sweden's Kristersson pointed to modest results from German and French outreach and said he sees no sign Russia wants peace.
Støre says allies were informed in advance, while critics are objecting anyway. The reporting doesn't tell us how detailed that briefing was.
What about Oleshky?
A localised ceasefire began there for humanitarian aid, and Melania Trump said it was brought forward two days and widened beyond the town.
Fair, but how long it holds and how much aid arrives isn't reported yet.
Il Polso
- Ninety minutes of direct talk with Putin has split European capitals, with Estonia and Sweden warning that any dialogue must not become a concession.
- The Kremlin's readout hardened the mood, demanding unconditional recognition of Russia's 'legitimate interests' and blaming NATO and the EU for confrontation.
- Kyiv has moved to claim the initiative, backing the call as coordinated with Ukraine and pressing for a ceasefire and a Zelenskyy-Putin meeting.
- A localised humanitarian ceasefire in Oleshky, widened for aid convoys, offers a fragile first step while strikes continue across the region.
- All eyes now turn to a trilateral meeting in the UAE next month, where the call's momentum will either be tested or quietly lost.
On a Tuesday in late October, the leaders of Finland and Norway spent ninety minutes on the telephone with Vladimir Putin, reaching for a way through a peace process that has stalled for years under the weight of mistrust. They framed the call as an attempt to open a door that Europe has largely watched others walk through, and they did so with the blessing of Kyiv, which saw in it a chance to give Europe a fresh role. Yet the Kremlin's account of the conversation returned to old grievances about NATO and the EU, and across the continent several capitals met the gesture with suspicion, asking whether any talk with Moscow can be trusted to end a war that Russia has shown little willingness to end on terms others would accept.
For ninety minutes on Tuesday, Finland's president, Alexander Stubb, and Norway's prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre, sat on the phone with Vladimir Putin, trying to loosen a deadlock that has held Russia and Ukraine apart. Stubb called the conversation frank and substantive, insisting that ending the war requires direct talks with Moscow, while Støre admitted that the two sides' positions remain far apart.
The Kremlin's version was colder. Putin blamed the EU and NATO for confrontation and demanded full recognition of Russia's legitimate interests. That tone deepened the unease in several European capitals. Estonia's foreign minister, Margus Tsahkna, argued that only more pressure would bring Moscow to the table, and Sweden's prime minister, Ulf Kristersson, insisted any peace must be built on Ukraine's terms and strength, not appeasement. German chancellor Friedrich Merz added that no settlement can be reached without Ukraine and European participation.
Kyiv saw things differently. Ukraine's foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, speaking in Helsinki, confirmed the call had been coordinated with Ukraine and called it the right way to engage Putin. He said President Zelenskyy wanted to send two signals: a ceasefire, and a readiness to meet Putin in person, since only a leaders' meeting could bring a real change in the talks. Sybiha described the European channel as a supplement to the US-led process and said Kyiv is ready for a trilateral meeting in the UAE next month.
Amid the diplomacy, the human cost remained stark. A localised ceasefire in Oleshky, in the Kherson region, was agreed to let humanitarian aid reach residents, a step Sybiha hoped could build confidence even as Russian strikes continued. The coming weeks will show whether the Nordic call becomes a real opening, or another attempt that falls short.
For ninety minutes on Tuesday, Finland's president, Alexander Stubb, and Norway's prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre, were on the phone with Vladimir Putin. They were trying to break the deadlock in peace talks between Russia and Ukraine. Stubb called the conversation frank and substantive and said that ending the war requires direct discussions with Russia. Støre acknowledged that significant differences remain between the sides' positions.
The Kremlin's account of the call was less conciliatory. According to its readout, Putin blamed the EU and Nato for confrontational policies and demanded full and unconditional recognition of the legitimate interests of the Russian Federation.
The call drew criticism from several European capitals. The prime ministers of Denmark, Estonia, Poland and Sweden reacted with scepticism or outright disapproval. Støre responded that all partners and allies had been told in advance. Estonia's foreign minister, Margus Tsahkna, wrote on X that only increased pressure would make Russia take negotiations seriously. He said every contact with Moscow must show European unity and make clear that Europe will not negotiate away the principles underpinning its security. In his view there is no sign Russia has changed its strategic aims, which he described as subjugating all of Ukraine and undermining the order built on Nato and the EU.
Sweden's prime minister, Ulf Kristersson, said any peace must be achieved on Ukraine's terms and through strength, not appeasement. He said the German and French attempts at dialogue with Moscow had produced very modest results, and that he saw nothing to suggest Russia wants peace. He added that he expected an update on the discussions later in the day. In Singapore, German chancellor Friedrich Merz said efforts by the US and Russia to end the war can never find solutions without Ukraine, and that any talks must include European countries. He said the war's end depends on one person, and that Europe is defending not only Ukraine's territory but the political order of the whole continent.
Kyiv took a different view. Speaking in Helsinki beside his Finnish and Norwegian counterparts, Ukraine's foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, confirmed the call had been coordinated with Ukraine and called that the right approach to any engagement with Putin. He said Ukraine wants a new momentum in the talks and a new role for Europe in the peace effort. President Zelenskyy had set out the signals he wanted passed to Putin, Sybiha said: a ceasefire, and a readiness to meet Putin in person. Negotiators can only go so far, he argued, and the only route to a new quality in the talks is a meeting of the two presidents. Zelenskyy, after being briefed by the Nordic leaders, called for real de-escalatory steps. Sybiha rejected the suggestion that the timing was poor, saying that in wartime every step supporting peace efforts is timely. He described the European channel as a supplementary track, not an alternative to the US-led talks, and said Kyiv is ready for a trilateral meeting in the UAE next month. He also conceded that the situation on the ground remains very tough because of relentless Russian strikes.
The call came hours after a localised ceasefire began in Oleshky, in the Kherson region, following intense calls for humanitarian aid to reach residents. Sybiha said it could serve as a confidence-building measure. US first lady Melania Trump, who helped organise it, said the start was moved forward two days to protect civilians and speed aid deliveries, and that the ceasefire zone was widened beyond Oleshky to give humanitarian convoys safe passage.
Elsewhere, tension with Russia was running high. Romania summoned the Russian ambassador over a fire on 14 September at the state-owned Carfil defence plant in Brașov, which also damaged several commercial premises. Three people are under investigation. Romania's intelligence service, the SRI, said it had identified a coordinated Russian sabotage network behind the arson, with other attempts on targets including international military facilities and sites used to train Ukrainian forces. President Nicușor Dan called it a grave violation of sovereignty and part of a premeditated campaign. UK defence secretary Wes Streeting warned that Putin is testing Nato's resolve and said Britain must be ready for a scenario of war with Russia, noting that Putin's assurances recall what he said days before invading Ukraine.
The next marker is the proposed trilateral meeting in the UAE next month, and whether Kyiv's call for a Zelenskyy-Putin meeting gains any traction.
Citazioni salienti
If you are at war, every step which supports peace efforts is always timely.— Andrii Sybiha, Ukraine's foreign minister
Any peace must be achieved on Ukraine's terms, through strength and not appeasement.— Ulf Kristersson, Sweden's prime minister