In the long and unresolved story of Gaza, Jared Kushner traveled to Egypt this weekend to sit face-to-face with Hamas's new leadership — a rare and symbolically charged encounter meant to revive a 15-point peace framework that has struggled to find purchase. His subsequent meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu produced little of substance, leaving the proposal where it began: suspended between two sides that have not yet found reason enough to move. The effort speaks to the Trump administration's ambition to reshape a conflict that has defeated many before it, even as the gap between t
Kushner-Netanyahu talks yield little progress on stalled Gaza deal
Ongoing Gaza conflict continues affecting civilian populations, though specific casualties not detailed in this diplomatic update.
The gap between the parties remains vast
Mark
Why would the Trump administration send Kushner to meet with Hamas directly? Isn't that politically risky?
Mimi
It signals they're willing to break with conventional diplomatic practice to pursue what they see as a breakthrough. Direct engagement with groups the U.S. officially opposes is unusual, but the administration seems to believe the payoff justifies the risk.
Mark
And the 15-point plan—what makes that different from previous proposals?
Mimi
The source doesn't detail the specific points, but the fact that it's being actively shopped to both sides suggests it's meant to be a comprehensive framework rather than a partial agreement. Whether it actually addresses the core disagreements is another question.
Mark
Netanyahu gave Kushner little to work with, then?
Mimi
The reporting suggests the meeting was cordial but unproductive. Netanyahu didn't reject the plan outright, but he also didn't signal movement on the issues that have blocked progress before.
Mark
So what does Kushner do now?
Mimi
That's the real question. He could return for another round, or the administration could step back and reassess. But the minimal progress here suggests they're running into the same walls that have stopped every previous attempt.
Mark
Is there any sense that either side actually wants a deal?
Mimi
The reporting doesn't answer that directly, but the fact that talks produced so little suggests both Hamas and Netanyahu may be waiting for circumstances to shift in their favor rather than compromising now.
O Pulso
- Kushner's direct talks with Hamas — a group the U.S. designates as a terrorist organization — mark an unusual breach of diplomatic convention, signaling how urgently the administration wants a deal.
- The 15-point peace plan, designed to bridge Israel's conditions and Hamas's demands, has stalled without either side showing signs of yielding their entrenched positions.
- Netanyahu's meeting with Kushner yielded little tangible movement, suggesting that whatever emerged from Egypt was not enough to shift Israeli calculations.
- Civilian populations in Gaza continue to bear the human cost of the diplomatic deadlock, even as the negotiations that could relieve that burden remain frozen.
- The administration shows no sign of abandoning the effort, but minimal progress from this latest round raises serious questions about whether the structural obstacles can be overcome by any diplomatic initiative.
In the long and unresolved story of Gaza, Jared Kushner traveled to Egypt this weekend to sit face-to-face with Hamas's new leadership — a rare and symbolically charged encounter meant to revive a 15-point peace framework that has struggled to find purchase. His subsequent meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu produced little of substance, leaving the proposal where it began: suspended between two sides that have not yet found reason enough to move. The effort speaks to the Trump administration's ambition to reshape a conflict that has defeated many before it, even as the gap between the parties remains as wide as ever.
Jared Kushner traveled to Egypt over the weekend to meet directly with Hamas's newly installed leadership — a rare encounter intended to breathe life into a stalled 15-point peace framework the Trump administration has been quietly shepherding for months. The willingness to engage Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, signals how far the administration is prepared to stretch diplomatic convention in pursuit of a settlement.
But when Kushner brought what emerged from those talks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the conversation yielded little of substance. Netanyahu's government holds conditions Hamas has long rejected; Hamas holds demands Israel has shown no appetite to accept. The 15-point plan was designed to bridge those positions — and yet, after a weekend of diplomacy, neither side appears to have moved.
Kushner carries no formal diplomatic credentials, but he carries the president's name and his direct access, and his presence in Egypt and Jerusalem was meant to signal seriousness of purpose. Symbolism, however, does not move negotiations. The humanitarian toll on Gaza's civilian population continues to mount, and humanitarian urgency alone has not yet proven sufficient to shift the strategic calculations of either party.
Whether Kushner returns for another attempt or the administration recalibrates its approach remains unclear. What is clear is that the structural obstacles separating the two sides may be more formidable than any single diplomatic initiative — however unconventional — can overcome.
Jared Kushner, the Trump administration's point person on Middle East diplomacy, traveled to Egypt over the weekend to sit across from Hamas's newly installed leadership—a rare direct encounter aimed at breathing life into a stalled peace framework. The 15-point proposal that Kushner has been shepherding represents the administration's most concrete attempt yet to break the deadlock that has frozen Gaza negotiations for months. But when Kushner subsequently met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss what had emerged from those talks, the conversation yielded little of substance.
The diplomatic effort underscores the administration's determination to claim progress on an issue that has resisted resolution through conventional channels. Kushner's willingness to engage directly with Hamas, an organization the United States designates as a terrorist group, signals how far the Trump team is willing to stretch diplomatic protocol in pursuit of a settlement. Yet the fact that these talks produced minimal movement suggests the gap between the parties remains vast.
Netanyahu's government has long maintained conditions that Hamas has rejected, and Hamas has held firm on demands that Israel has shown no appetite to accept. The 15-point plan was designed to bridge these positions, but after Kushner's weekend in Egypt and his subsequent conversations with Netanyahu, it remains unclear whether either side has budged from entrenched positions. The lack of tangible progress indicates that whatever momentum the administration hoped to generate has stalled before it could gain traction.
The timing of these talks reflects the Trump administration's broader push to reshape Middle East diplomacy on its own terms. Kushner, who has no formal diplomatic training but carries the weight of the president's family name and direct access, has become the face of this initiative. His presence in Egypt and his meetings with Netanyahu carry symbolic weight—a signal that the administration views this as a priority. Yet symbolism alone does not move negotiations forward.
What remains unclear is whether either Hamas or Netanyahu sees sufficient incentive to move toward compromise. The humanitarian toll of the ongoing conflict continues to mount, with civilian populations in Gaza bearing the weight of the stalemate. Yet the diplomatic record suggests that humanitarian concern, however acute, has not yet proven sufficient to shift the calculations of either side. Kushner's meetings may have clarified positions, but they do not appear to have altered them.
The path forward remains obscured. The administration has invested political capital in this initiative, and Kushner's continued engagement suggests it will not abandon the effort quickly. But the minimal progress from this latest round of talks points to a deeper problem: the structural obstacles that have prevented agreement may be more formidable than any diplomatic initiative can overcome. Whether Kushner will return to the region for another attempt, or whether the administration will recalibrate its approach, remains to be seen.
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em The Washington Post ↗
Politics & Governance