In the long and unresolved story of Gaza, Jared Kushner arrived in Jerusalem this week as an emissary of political urgency, seeking to bridge a gap that has resisted bridging: Israel's insistence on Hamas disarmament before any withdrawal, and the Trump administration's need to show the world that diplomacy is moving. The meeting is less a negotiation between equals than a collision between two different kinds of clocks — one measuring security conditions on the ground, the other measuring political capital in Washington. What hangs in the balance, as it so often does in this conflict, is not
Kushner Meets Netanyahu as Trump Administration Pushes for Gaza Progress
Ongoing Gaza military operations continue affecting civilian population amid unresolved withdrawal timeline.
One side needs security guarantees; the other needs political wins.
Mark
Why does Netanyahu's demand for full disarmament matter so much? Why not accept a phased withdrawal?
Mimi
Because from his perspective, any Israeli troops leaving Gaza before Hamas is completely disarmed means the threat remains. He's betting that staying longer now prevents having to come back later.
Mark
And the Trump administration—why the rush?
Mimi
They've staked their credibility on being dealmakers. Every month this drags on makes them look less effective. They need something to announce.
Mark
So these two pressures are working against each other.
Mimi
Exactly. Netanyahu's timeline is measured in security milestones. Trump's is measured in news cycles. They're not the same thing.
Mark
What happens if Kushner can't bridge that gap?
Mimi
Then you get what you have now—Israeli forces staying in place, no clear endpoint, and the people living there waiting for something to change.
Mark
Is there any middle ground?
Mimi
Maybe. Phased disarmament with international verification. Partial withdrawals tied to specific milestones. But both sides have to want it, and right now they're still talking past each other.
El Pulso
- Netanyahu has made full Hamas disarmament a non-negotiable precondition for any Israeli withdrawal, creating a wall that no amount of diplomatic pressure has yet moved.
- The Trump administration, having staked its identity on dealmaking, is running out of room to absorb the optics of an open-ended stalemate with no visible progress to show.
- Kushner's arrival in Israel signals a high-level push to find language or sequencing that lets both sides claim forward motion without surrendering their core positions.
- The talks remain closed to the public, leaving observers to read the silence — and the absence of any announced breakthrough — as a sign that the gap is still wide.
- Meanwhile, Gaza's civilian population continues to absorb the costs of an unresolved military presence, with no announced timeline for relief or withdrawal.
In the long and unresolved story of Gaza, Jared Kushner arrived in Jerusalem this week as an emissary of political urgency, seeking to bridge a gap that has resisted bridging: Israel's insistence on Hamas disarmament before any withdrawal, and the Trump administration's need to show the world that diplomacy is moving. The meeting is less a negotiation between equals than a collision between two different kinds of clocks — one measuring security conditions on the ground, the other measuring political capital in Washington. What hangs in the balance, as it so often does in this conflict, is not only the fate of a deal but the daily lives of a civilian population caught between the imperatives of others.
Jared Kushner arrived in Israel this week carrying a political timeline that does not match the reality on the ground. The Trump administration needs visible progress in Gaza — something it can point to as proof that its brand of diplomacy is working. But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has set a condition that resists any quick resolution: Israeli forces will not leave Gaza until Hamas is fully disarmed.
Netanyahu frames this as a security imperative, not a negotiating position. From the Israeli establishment's perspective, withdrawing before Hamas is neutralized simply restores the threat that the military campaign was meant to eliminate. The logic is coherent on its own terms — but it operates on a timeline that may have no clear endpoint.
Kushner's visit was an attempt to find the narrow space where both governments can claim movement without abandoning what each considers essential. The Trump administration, having positioned itself as capable of achieving what others could not, cannot afford to let Gaza harden into a symbol of stalemate. Yet the security guarantees Netanyahu requires take time to verify and implement — time that political calendars do not easily accommodate.
The details of what was discussed remain private. What is public is the shape of the impasse: two different clocks running at different speeds, with Gaza's civilian population caught in the interval between them. Whether Kushner's visit produced any real movement, or simply confirmed how far apart the positions remain, will become clearer in the weeks ahead.
Jared Kushner arrived in Israel this week carrying the weight of a political timeline that does not align with the facts on the ground. The Trump administration needs a win—something it can point to as progress in Gaza, some visible movement toward resolution. But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has drawn a line that complicates any quick resolution: Israeli forces will not withdraw from Gaza, he has said, until Hamas is fully disarmed.
This is the deadlock that Kushner came to untangle. Netanyahu's position is rooted in what he frames as a security imperative. Hamas, he argues, cannot be allowed to reconstitute itself as a military force capable of launching attacks on Israel. Full disarmament is not negotiable in his view—it is a prerequisite for any Israeli pullback. The logic is straightforward from the Israeli security establishment's perspective: leave too early, and you leave the threat intact.
But the Trump administration faces its own pressure. Having positioned itself as a dealmaker capable of achieving what previous administrations could not, it needs to demonstrate tangible progress. The longer the situation in Gaza remains unresolved, the more it looks like stalemate rather than breakthrough. Kushner's visit signals an attempt to find the narrow space where both sides can claim movement without abandoning their core demands.
The humanitarian dimension of this impasse is substantial. The longer Israeli military operations continue in Gaza, the longer the civilian population there remains caught in the consequences. There is no clear timeline for when conditions might change, no announced endpoint to the current military presence. The negotiations happening in closed rooms in Jerusalem will determine whether that changes.
What Kushner and Netanyahu discussed remains largely private. But the fundamental tension is visible: one side needs security guarantees that take time to verify and implement; the other needs political wins that can be announced and celebrated. Whether those two clocks can be synchronized, or whether one will simply run out first, remains the central question. The coming weeks will show whether this meeting produced movement or simply confirmed that the positions remain as far apart as they were before Kushner arrived.
Citas Notables
Israeli forces will not withdraw from Gaza until Hamas is fully disarmed— Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en The New York Times ↗
War & Conflict