On the occasion of its annual meeting, KMD Brands, the company behind Kathmandu and Rip Curl, has told its shareholders that sales rose in the first quarter of the financial year, yet the margin earned on each sale has narrowed. Like many retailers that have grown their business while clearing older stock, the company is finding that revenue and profit do not always travel together. Its turnaround, built on store closures and a target of $25 million in cost cuts this year, is still a work in progress, and a loss-making firm under pressure from large investors must now show that it can make the
KMD Brands Sales Rise as Heavy Discounting Squeezes Margins Ahead of Cost-Cut Target
Sales are up, but the money earned on each sale is down.
On the occasion of its annual meeting, KMD Brands, the company behind Kathmandu and Rip Curl, has told its shareholders that sales rose in the first quarter of the financial year, yet the margin earned on each sale has narrowed. Like many retailers that have grown their business while clearing older stock, the company is finding that revenue and profit do not always travel together. Its turnaround, built on store closures and a target of $25 million in cost cuts this year, is still a work in progress, and a loss-making firm under pressure from large investors must now show that it can make the numbers lead somewhere.
At its annual meeting, KMD Brands, owner of Kathmandu and Rip Curl, told shareholders it is on track to meet its cost-cutting goal for this year. It came with a qualification: sales are up, but the money earned on each sale has fallen.
In the first three months of the financial year, overall sales rose. The company attributed part of that growth to selling more product at a discount to clear older stock. Markdowns bring in revenue, but they leave less of each dollar once the cost of the goods is paid.
The business is still losing money, and management is in the middle of a turnaround. Stores are closing and operations are being slimmed down as part of a plan to take $25 million out of costs this year. Some large investors, meanwhile, want the company to sell its underperforming assets. Management is trying to fix the business as it stands and, in doing so, to hold those calls at bay.
The update leaves two forces pulling in opposite directions. Rising sales are a better sign than falling ones, but the discounting behind them is eating into margins. The cost cuts are meant to work from the other side. What remains unclear is how much of the sales rise reflects real demand, and how large the margin decline is. The answer will show whether the improvement lasts. If the savings do not offset thinner margins, the case for selling assets will grow stronger.
At its annual meeting, KMD Brands, the company that owns Kathmandu and Rip Curl, told shareholders it is on track to meet its cost-cutting goal for this year. The message came with a qualification: sales are up, but the money earned on each sale is down.
The company reported that overall sales rose in the first three months of its financial year. Across the business, though, gross margins were squeezed. The reason, as the company described it, was that it sold more product at a discount in order to clear older stock. Higher sales driven partly by markdowns bring in revenue, but they leave less of each dollar after the cost of the goods themselves.
KMD Brands is a loss-making business, and its management is in the middle of a turnaround. The company is closing stores and slimming down its operations as part of a plan to take $25 million out of its costs this year. At the meeting, management said it remains on track to reach that figure.
There is also pressure from outside the boardroom. Some large investors have been calling for the company to sell off its underperforming assets. Management is trying to fix the business as it stands, and in doing so to stave off those calls. How convincingly the turnaround proceeds will bear on whether that pressure eases or grows.
The update leaves two things running in opposite directions. Sales growth in the first quarter is a better sign than a decline would have been, but the discounting behind part of it is eating into margins. Cost cuts are meant to improve the bottom line from the other side, by shrinking what it costs to run the business.
The reporting available so far does not break down the sales increase by brand or by region, and it does not say how much of the rise came from discounting versus underlying demand. Nor does it give the size of the margin decline. Those details would show how much of the improvement is durable.
What to watch next is whether the $25 million in savings, delivered through store closures and a leaner business, is enough to offset thinner margins and move KMD Brands toward profit. If it is not, the argument from large investors for selling assets is likely to gain strength.
Citations marquantes
The company said it remains on track to achieve its cost-cutting goal this year.— KMD Brands management, at its annual meeting