In a new book, Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor name what they believe the climate movement has long avoided confronting: a coherent ideological faction, which they call 'end times fascists,' for whom planetary collapse is not a catastrophe to prevent but an outcome to embrace. Their argument is not about ordinary denial or political inconvenience, but about a worldview that has concluded the earth cannot be saved and that the only remaining values are power, hierarchy, and control. The authors contend this faction is not marginal — it shapes policy, narrows imagination, and quietly accelerates th
The New York Times
· Sep 12, 2026
· society
· 1 min de lectura
Medium
Verificación: Verificado
Klein and Taylor: 'End Times Fascists' Embrace Planetary Collapse
◉
Climate & Environment
2095 artículos relacionados
Human-driven warming directly linked to Antarctic glacier's accelerate…
Mirage News · 100% coincidencia
Study: Cleaner Air Paradoxically Traps More Methane, Worsening Climate…
News18 · 99% coincidencia
Cambodia named world's top nation for natural environment by U.S. News
VnExpress International · 99% coincidencia
Study Finds Climate TRACE Database Undercounts Urban Vehicle Emissions…
SciTechDaily · 99% coincidencia
Thawing Permafrost Absorbs CO2 Through Rock Weathering, Study Finds
Good News Network · 99% coincidencia
Cobertura Relacionada
The New York Times · Sep 13
Air Pocket Offers Hope in Nepal Hydropower Tunnel Rescue
Rescuers in Nepal discovered an air pocket in a flood-clogged hydropower tunnel where six workers are believed trapped, …
Al Jazeera · Sep 13 Wildfire Forces Emergency Alert on Croatia's Brac IslandA wildfire is raging on Brac Island off Croatia's Dalmatian coast, with strong winds complicating firefighting efforts n…
The New York Times · Sep 13 Following Nepal's Devastating Flood: A Path of DestructionA catastrophic flood in Nepal killed over 1,300 people and left 5,000 missing as a river turned into a deadly torrent, d…
The Mac Observer · Sep 13 Apple Claims 60% Carbon Reduction, But Path to 2030 Goal Remains UnclearApple reports its carbon footprint is 60 percent below 2015 levels as of 2025, maintaining the same reduction rate from …
Sesgo y Encuadre
⚖
Article uses inflammatory terminology ('end times fascists') to frame climate skeptics, employing loaded language that prioritizes dramatic framing over neutral analysis of ideological disagreements.
Bias Direction
center-left
Confidence
HIGH
Moral panic framing combined with authority-by-association (amplifying authors' characterizations without independent verification). The headline leads with provocative terminology rather than substantive policy disagreements.
end times fascists
willing to accept planetary destruction
raising alarms
ideological threats
Voices of those labeled 'end times fascists' defending their actual positions
Climate scientists or economists who disagree with Klein/Taylor's framing
Conservative or libertarian perspectives on climate policy trade-offs
Counterarguments to the book's central thesis
Analysis of whether the terminology is analytically useful or rhetorically divisive
Impacto Geopolítico
🌎
Klein and Taylor warn of ideological movements embracing planetary collapse, framing climate inaction as existential threat to global stability and international cooperation.
Escalation Risk
moderate
Confidence
MED
Global
United States
European Union
Developing nations vulnerable to climate impacts
Highlights ideological fragmentation within developed nations, potentially weakening unified climate governance. May strengthen coalitions between climate-conscious states while marginalizing climate-skeptical actors in international forums.
Echoes 1930s ideological polarization preceding WWII, where competing worldviews undermined collective action on existential threats; differs in that current divide is primarily ideological rather than geopolitical.
Lente Económico
📈
Political ideology critique regarding climate action resistance may signal market uncertainty around environmental policy implementation and green investment commitments.
Market Signal
mixed
Confidence
LOW
Renewable energy
Climate technology
Insurance and risk management
Agriculture
Real estate and property
Fossil fuels
Households face potential long-term economic risks from climate inaction (property damage, resource scarcity, insurance costs) versus near-term costs from climate policies. Political polarization may delay protective measures, increasing future financial exposure.
Heightened political debate over climate regulation could delay or weaken environmental policies. May accelerate ESG-focused legislation in some jurisdictions while facing resistance in others. Potential for increased regulatory fragmentation across regions.