Khan's sons accuse Pakistan army chief of vendetta as ex-PM faces harsh prison conditions

Imran Khan, 73, imprisoned since 2023, held in solitary confinement with deteriorating health including near-total vision loss in one eye and high blood pressure; denied family contact and adequate medical care.
He's locked in a tiny cell without human contact. They're slowly killing him.
Khan's son describes conditions in solitary confinement and alleges deliberate harm by authorities.
Mark

So the sons are saying their father is being tortured. Is that what the reporting actually shows?

Mimi

The reporting shows they believe he's being tortured—that's their word, their fear. The UN's torture rapporteur said the conditions *could* constitute psychological torture. But there's a difference between what the family alleges and what's independently verified.

Luke

Right. The government denies everything. They say he has family visits, exercise equipment, home-cooked food. We don't have independent confirmation of either account.

Mimi

No, we don't. What we do know is concrete: he's been in solitary confinement in a 6x8 cell, his sons haven't spoken to him in six months, he lost 85 percent of vision in one eye, and the supreme court had to order him to a private hospital.

Mark

Why does the army chief have this much power over a prisoner?

Mimi

Because in Pakistan, the military doesn't just enforce law—it shapes it. Munir is the chief of defence forces. When Khan was PM, he demoted Munir. Now Munir is in power and Khan is in prison.

Luke

But we should be careful here. The sons are alleging a personal vendetta. That's plausible given the history, but it's still an allegation. We don't have Munir on record explaining his role in Khan's treatment.

Mark

The government statement says Khan is being treated fairly. Do we have any reason to believe that?

Luke

The government's own actions undercut it. The supreme court had to order private hospital treatment. The family was denied contact for six months. Those are facts that don't fit the narrative of adequate conditions.

Mimi

And the international pressure—the UN, Sky Sports broadcasting the sons' interview—suggests the government itself feels vulnerable on this point. If conditions were truly adequate, why complain to Sky Sports?

Mark

What happens next?

Mimi

The supreme court rules Wednesday on whether the government is in contempt. PTI is planning a nationwide march. The sons are still trying to get visas to Pakistan. It's not over.

  • Khan's sons say their father is being deliberately broken — isolated in a six-by-eight-foot cell, denied family contact for six months, and losing vision in one eye due to what they describe as deliberate medical neglect.
  • The alleged architect of this treatment is army chief Asim Munir, whose personal history with Khan — demoted by him during his premiership — has, his sons argue, transformed state power into an instrument of private vendetta.
  • When a British broadcaster aired an interview with Khan's sons during a cricket test match, Pakistan's government filed a formal complaint and the national team threatened to leave the field — a reaction his son called proof of how isolated the regime has become from global norms.
  • Pakistan's supreme court rules Wednesday on whether the government has violated its own court orders by blocking Khan's access to private medical care, family visits, and communication — a ruling that could either check or confirm the state's impunity.
  • Khan's party plans a nationwide march demanding his release, while the government insists he is held in comfortable conditions — a claim that stands in direct contradiction to six months of documented silence between a father and his children.

In London, the sons of a former cricket hero turned prime minister speak of a father they have not heard from in six months — held in a cell barely larger than a wardrobe, his eyesight failing, his access to medicine controlled by the state. Imran Khan, 73, has been imprisoned in Pakistan since 2023 on corruption charges his family and supporters call instruments of revenge, wielded by an army chief he once demoted. The case has drawn the attention of the United Nations, which warns his conditions may constitute torture, and now moves toward a supreme court ruling that may test whether law still operates independently of power in Pakistan.

From their home in London, Imran Khan's two eldest sons — Sulaiman, 29, and Kasim, 27 — have not spoken to their father in more than six months. Denied visas to return to Pakistan for nine months, they have become the loudest voices describing conditions inside Adiala prison in Rawalpindi, where the former prime minister has been held since 2023 on corruption charges he calls politically fabricated.

Khan, now 73, is serving a 14-year sentence in a cell measuring six feet by eight feet. His sons describe months without new books, without family visits, without access to an independent doctor. A blood clot in a retinal vein has destroyed roughly 85 percent of the vision in his right eye — damage they attribute to medical neglect. When the supreme court ordered him transferred to a private hospital, authorities took him to a government facility instead, declared him fit, and returned him to his cell.

The sons point directly at army chief Asim Munir as the force behind this treatment. When Khan was prime minister, he demoted Munir. When Munir rose to army chief in 2022, pressure on Khan intensified sharply. Sulaiman told the Guardian the pattern is unmistakable — a personal grudge translated into state policy. Kasim said the family believes authorities are attempting to slowly kill his father, waiting for international attention to wane before tightening conditions further.

The United Nations has stated that Khan's detention violates international law, and its special rapporteur on torture has warned his solitary confinement may constitute psychological torture. When British broadcaster Sky Sports aired an interview with his sons during an England-Pakistan test match, the Pakistani government filed a formal complaint and the national team threatened to walk off the field — a reaction Sulaiman read as a sign of how disconnected the regime has become from the wider world.

Khan's trajectory is one of profound reversals. He came to power in 2018 with military backing, promising a corruption-free Pakistan. By 2022, he had fallen out with those same patrons and was removed from office. As his public campaign against military influence grew louder, he was arrested and charged with more than 100 crimes. He has refused any negotiated exit. His closest aide says the only deal Khan would accept is the restoration of democracy itself. His sons say he would not abandon that position to secure his own freedom. Whether Wednesday's supreme court ruling will shift the terms of his confinement — or whether the pressure applied from London can reach inside the machinery arrayed against him — remains the open question.

Imran Khan's two eldest sons sat down with the Guardian from their home in London this week with a stark accusation: Pakistan's army chief is methodically destroying their father through deliberate neglect and isolation. Kasim Khan, 27, and Sulaiman Khan, 29, have not spoken to their father in more than six months. They have been denied visas to return to Pakistan for nine months despite repeated applications. Yet they have become the primary voice calling attention to conditions inside Adiala prison in Rawalpindi, where the former prime minister has been held since his arrest in 2023 on corruption charges he maintains are politically fabricated.

Khan is serving a 14-year sentence in a cell measuring six feet by eight feet, held in solitary confinement without meaningful human contact. His sons describe the space as a form of deliberate punishment. Sulaiman detailed the specifics: no new books for months, no family visits, no access to an independent physician. Khan, now 73, has developed a blood clot in a retinal vein that has destroyed roughly 85 percent of the vision in his right eye—damage his sons attribute to months of medical neglect. He has also been diagnosed with high blood pressure. When the supreme court ordered Khan transferred to a private hospital for treatment last month, authorities took him instead to a government facility, administered injections, declared him fit for prison, and returned him to his cell. The family received no independent assessment of his actual condition.

The sons point directly at Asim Munir, Pakistan's chief of defence forces and army chief, as the architect of this treatment. The history between the two men is well documented. When Khan served as prime minister, he demoted Munir. The tension between them was public knowledge. When Munir ascended to army chief in 2022, the pressure on Khan intensified sharply. Sulaiman told the Guardian the pattern is unmistakable: "It's very clear this is being driven by personal grudge and that's one of the reasons he's being treated so harshly, on the orders of Asim Munir." Kasim went further, saying the family believes authorities are attempting to "slowly kill him in there," waiting for international attention to fade before tightening restrictions further.

The international community has taken notice. The United Nations has stated that Khan's prolonged detention violates international law. The UN's special rapporteur on torture has warned that his solitary confinement and detention conditions could constitute psychological torture. Last month, Sky Sports broadcast an interview with Khan's sons during coverage of a test match between England and Pakistan. The Pakistan Cricket Board, which maintains close ties to the government and whose chair also serves as interior minister, filed a formal complaint with Sky Sports. The Pakistani team threatened to walk off the field after lunch. Sulaiman saw the reaction as revealing: "It shows how out of touch they are with the rest of the world, that they thought they could silence media like they do at home."

On Wednesday, Pakistan's supreme court will rule on a contempt case alleging the government has violated court orders by denying Khan private hospital treatment, preventing family visits, and blocking communication with his family for more than six months. Later this month, Khan's political party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, which he founded in 1996 after retiring from international cricket, plans to organize a nationwide march demanding his release. The government has dismissed the family's account as "fake propaganda," stating in a formal statement that Khan is held in adequate conditions with access to home-cooked food, nuts, bottled water, exercise equipment, family visits, and regular medical examinations—claims that directly contradict the family's testimony and the documented absence of contact for half a year.

Khan's fall from power reveals the deeper currents at work. He came to office in 2018 with explicit military backing, promising to build a "new Pakistan" free of corruption and governed by law. His tenure was marked instead by allegations of corruption, press censorship, and persecution of opponents. In 2022, he fell out with his military patrons and was removed from power. He then began a public campaign against military influence in governance. By 2023, as his accusations against the military intensified, the tables turned. He was arrested and charged with more than 100 crimes, including corruption and sedition—charges he characterizes as fabricated political retaliation.

Despite his imprisonment, Khan retains significant public support. His sons say authorities want to "sideline him and disappear him from public life." Yet they also note that international coverage has rattled the government, suggesting the regime is not as confident in its grip as it appears. When asked whether their father might negotiate a deal with the military for his release, his closest aide, Zulfi Bukhari, offered a response that speaks to Khan's intransigence: "There is only one deal Khan would ever accept: the restoration of democracy, the rule of law and the people's mandate in Pakistan." Kasim and Sulaiman said they do not believe their father would abandon his political mission to secure freedom. "He's a very single-minded person," Kasim said. "I don't think there's a chance that he'd ever give it up." The question now is whether the supreme court's ruling this week will alter the trajectory of his confinement, or whether the pressure his sons are applying from abroad will prove insufficient against the machinery arrayed against him inside Pakistan.

It's very clear this is being driven by personal grudge and that's one of the reasons he's being treated so harshly, on the orders of Asim Munir.
— Sulaiman Khan, Imran Khan's son
There is only one deal Khan would ever accept: the restoration of democracy, the rule of law and the people's mandate in Pakistan.
— Zulfi Bukhari, Khan's closest aide
Contattaci Domande frequenti