In a Nairobi courtroom, a legal chapter long shadowed by distance has come briefly into the light: an American lawyer, speaking through a remote link, told the High Court that Mohammed Abdulmalik spent seventeen years in the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay without ever being charged with a crime. The case, rooted in a 2008 petition by his siblings, asks whether a Kenyan man can be held and moved across borders without the protections his own constitution promises. Its outcome remains unwritten, held for now in written submissions and a date in November, where a fragile question of justice and
Kenyan Held at Guantanamo for 17 Years Without Charge, Lawyer Tells Nairobi High Court
The stigma of Guantanamo follows him even though he was never charged.
Why does this testimony matter, given that Abdulmalik is already out?
Because the petition dates to 2008. His family asked a Kenyan court to rule on whether his handover and detention without charge were lawful. His release didn't answer that question.
Let's be clear on what the court has actually heard. This is one witness, his own lawyer, describing conditions and events.
What did he say about the conditions?
Shackling during transport and visits, inadequate medical care, temperatures above 100°F. He also pointed to a 2023 UN Special Rapporteur report he said called conditions near to torture.
Note that is his characterisation of the report. We have the exhibit number, FP6, but not the report's own wording in this coverage.
And the handover itself?
Panopoulos said Kenyan authorities handed him over. The state's lawyer suggested US officers captured him in Kenya.
That remains contested. Panopoulos also said transit details are under a US protective order, so the court may not hear the full account.
He said no charges meant no evidence. Is that established?
No. That is his assertion in answer to a question. The reporting doesn't show the US position.
What is on record is the 2021 review board recommending release, and the life afterward: two years without work.
Le Pouls
- A man held for seventeen years without charge has finally been heard in a Nairobi courtroom, and the weight of that silence is audible in every answer.
- Testimony from abroad describes shackles on the floor, heat above 100 degrees, and a prison system a UN report called near to torture.
- The family's petition presses the Attorney General and Police Commissioner on how Abdulmalik left Kenyan custody, and the state counsel contests the account at every turn.
- Justice Mburu has ordered written submissions within fourteen days, with a compliance check set for November 25, so the case is moving but not yet resolved.
- Even after release in 2024, Abdulmalik reportedly struggles to find work, as the stigma of Guantanamo lingers long after the gates have opened.
In a Nairobi courtroom, a legal chapter long shadowed by distance has come briefly into the light: an American lawyer, speaking through a remote link, told the High Court that Mohammed Abdulmalik spent seventeen years in the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay without ever being charged with a crime. The case, rooted in a 2008 petition by his siblings, asks whether a Kenyan man can be held and moved across borders without the protections his own constitution promises. Its outcome remains unwritten, held for now in written submissions and a date in November, where a fragile question of justice and accountability waits for its next turn.
In a Nairobi courtroom at the Milimani High Court, an American lawyer, Frank Panopoulos, gave evidence under oath by remote link before Justice David Mburu. He spoke for a client he had represented at Guantanamo Bay from 2018 until 2024, Mohammed Abdulmalik, who was held from 2007 and never charged with any crime. Panopoulos called it indefinite detention, the kind that prisoners know as the forever prison.
The case reaches back to a 2008 petition filed by Abdulmalik's siblings, Mariam Mohammed and Salim Khamis. Their account is that Kenyan authorities arrested him in February 2007 over suspicion of involvement in the 2002 Paradise Hotel bombing in Mombasa, and then handed him to United States forces without any extradition process. They argue this breached his constitutional right to be charged or brought before a court in time, and they ask for his release and return to Kenya.
Panopoulos described a harsh regime: shackling during transport and visits, poor medical care, and punishing heat. He recalled preparing his client for a 2021 review board that recommended release, and said he was shut out of the negotiations that followed and never saw the final agreement. He also spoke of a request to ease six conditions of confinement and a letter to the base commander that went unanswered.
Under cross-examination, state counsel Marwa pressed on how Abdulmalik came into American hands. Panopoulos answered that the absence of charges reflected an absence of evidence, and that transfer details were under protective orders. When Marwa suggested he had been captured in Kenya, the witness said he was not captured but handed over by Kenyan authorities. The judge reined in the questioning.
For now the case rests on paperwork. The petitioner has fourteen days to file final submissions, the respondent fourteen days after service, and the court will check compliance on November 25.
In a Nairobi courtroom, a lawyer testifying from abroad told the High Court that a Kenyan man was held for 17 years at Guantanamo Bay and never once charged with a crime. American attorney Frank Panopoulos gave his evidence under oath, by remote link, before Justice David Mburu at the Milimani High Court. He said his former client, Mohammed Abdulmalik, was detained from 2007 until his release in 2024.
Panopoulos adopted an affidavit dated July 23, 2026. "He was never charged with anything," he told the court. "He was held indefinitely without charge, what is known as a forever prisoner in the common parlance." He said he represented Abdulmalik at the Guantanamo Naval Base prison from 2018 until 2024.
The proceedings trace back to a 2008 petition filed by Abdulmalik's siblings, Mariam Mohammed and Salim Khamis. According to the family's case, Kenyan authorities arrested him in February 2007 over suspected involvement in the 2002 Paradise Hotel bombing in Mombasa. He was then, they say, secretly handed to United States military forces with no domestic extradition proceedings. The family argues this violated his constitutional right to be arraigned in court or properly charged within the statutory timeframe. They named the Commissioner of Police and the Attorney General as respondents and asked for his immediate release and repatriation to Kenya.
Panopoulos described the prison as "very strict and even harsh." Detainees were shackled during transport and during visits, he said, with inadequate medical care and temperatures above 100°F. Even in meetings with him, he said, his client was restrained: "He was shackled to the floor with metal shackles when he was transported." He cited a UN Special Rapporteur's report of June 14, 2023, entered as exhibit FP6, which he said described conditions as "near to being torture."
He told the court he prepared Abdulmalik for a 2021 Periodic Review Board hearing. The board recommended release, following reviews by US defence officials and congressional committees and negotiations between the US and Kenya. Panopoulos said he was excluded from those negotiations and never saw the final agreement. He also read from a reply brief dated September 22, 2023, in which Abdulmalik asked a US court to relax six specific conditions of his imprisonment pending release and transfer, citing continuing violations of international humanitarian law. He said he wrote to the commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo seeking eased conditions and a meeting, but the commander did not respond and denied the request for a meeting.
The aftermath, he said, has continued. "In the two years since his release, he hasn't been able to get work. The stigma of Guantanamo follows him even though he was never charged."
On cross-examination, state counsel Marwa asked Panopoulos whether he knew why Abdulmalik was never charged, and pressed him on how his client came into US custody. Panopoulos answered that the absence of charges reflected an absence of evidence. He said details of the transit were covered by US court protective orders, and he declined to disclose classified transfer details. When Marwa suggested US officers had captured Abdulmalik in Kenya, Panopoulos replied, "He was not captured," and said the evidence showed he was handed over by Kenyan authority. Justice Mburu intervened, telling Marwa to restrict his questions to the evidence the witness had given.
The judge then set directions. Final written submissions are to be filed and exchanged: the petitioner within 14 days, the respondent within 14 days of being served. A mention on November 25 will confirm compliance.
Citations marquantes
He was never charged with anything. He was held indefinitely without charge, what is known as a forever prisoner in the common parlance.— Frank Panopoulos, lawyer for Mohammed Abdulmalik
Mr Marwa, please just restrict your questioning to the evidence that this witness has given.— Justice David Mburu