Justice system's blind spot: Why sex workers remain targets for predators

Two sex workers murdered by Simon Levy; a third brutally attacked; endemic violence against sex workers with 90% experiencing violence in some regions.
Women telling us where the danger is are being ignored
A charity leader explains why sex workers don't report violence to police, and why that silence costs lives.
Mark

Why did Levy think he could get away with it? What made him confident?

Mimi

He wasn't guessing. He was reading the system. Sex workers report violence at rates far below what they experience—only 8 percent of documented incidents reach police—because they don't trust the system to take them seriously. He saw that gap and stepped into it.

Mark

But the police say they've changed their approach. They have harm reduction guidance now.

Mimi

The guidance exists. But frontline officers are still arresting and fining women, not the men buying sex. And when police use closure zones to "clear" areas where sex workers gather, they're actually scattering them into more isolated places. The policy sounds protective. The effect is the opposite.

Mark

So the women who might have reported him, or warned each other—they were pushed away by the very people meant to protect them?

Mimi

Exactly. Sheryl Wilkins was displaced from her regular spot because of a policing strategy. She ended up in the car park where Levy killed her. The women working near her felt the connection immediately. They understood what had happened.

Mark

What would actually change this?

Mimi

Some argue for decriminalization—removing the legal barriers that make women hide from police. Others want to criminalize the buyers instead. But the real issue is simpler: you have to listen to the people being harmed. You have to resource the work. You have to let managed zones operate. Merseyside did it. It worked. But it hasn't spread.

Mark

Why not?

Mimi

Funding dried up. Residents complained. The political will to protect a group already stigmatized is thin. And there's a deeper problem: for decades, the system treated violence against sex workers as inevitable, almost normal. That's the blindness Levy exploited.

Mark

Can it be repaired?

Mimi

Yes, but not quickly. Trust takes time to build after it's been destroyed. The Met is trying now. But as the charity working on this said—sex workers have only recently been spoken to at all. You can't undo that overnight.

  • Simon Levy murdered two sex workers and raped a third, selecting victims he calculated the system had already abandoned — and the system proved him right.
  • Ninety percent of sex workers surveyed in Scotland reported experiencing violence, yet only 8% of incidents documented by support charities are ever shared with police, leaving predators to operate in a vast, unmonitored silence.
  • A national policing strategy called Clear, Hold, Build — designed to combat organized crime — was deployed against street sex work, breaking up the safety partnerships women relied on and displacing Sheryl Wilkins into the isolated location where she was killed.
  • The pattern is not new: a 2006 government crackdown on managed tolerance zones preceded the Ipswich murders of five sex workers that same autumn, a warning written in lives that policy makers did not heed.
  • Promising models exist — Merseyside's hate crime framework achieved a 67% rape conviction rate over a decade, and Leeds' Holbeck managed zone demonstrably saved lives — but both remain exceptions, underfunded and unemulated.
  • Since the murders, specialist officers and charity education programmes are attempting to rebuild trust, but decades of institutional dismissal cannot be repaired quickly, and the next predator is already making his calculations.

In the shadow of two murders and a system-wide reckoning, the case of Simon Levy forces a society to confront what it has long chosen not to see: that when institutions decide certain lives are expendable, predators take careful note. Across the United Kingdom, sex workers face endemic violence while reporting rates remain devastatingly low — not from indifference, but from a rational distrust of the very structures meant to protect them. The gap between what is suffered and what is reported is not a bureaucratic footnote; it is the precise space in which killers like Levy learn to operate. The deeper question is not whether the system failed, but whether it was ever truly designed to succeed for these women.

Simon Levy was a registered sex offender with a history of violence dating to 2018. In the months before August 2025, he raped a trafficked woman in a Tottenham car park — a classical pianist from eastern Europe who survived and vowed she would play music again. Then he returned and murdered Sheryl Wilkins. He had already killed Carmenza Valencia-Trujillo. He chose these women deliberately, believing the system had written them off. A whole life sentence eventually stopped him, but the question his case leaves behind is more troubling than the man himself: why did he ever believe he could get away with it?

The answer is structural. Research consistently finds that sex workers face endemic levels of violence — a Scottish survey found 90% had experienced it, including attempted murder. Yet of the 1,047 incidents reported to National Ugly Mugs last year, only 8% were shared with police. That chasm between suffering and reporting is not paranoia. It is a rational response to years of harmful policing. Women working alongside Wilkins had spent a year raising concerns about police treatment before her death. A national framework called Clear, Hold, Build, introduced in 2023 to target organized crime, was being applied to street sex work as antisocial behaviour — creating closure zones, making arrests, and breaking up the informal safety arrangements women used to protect one another. Wilkins was displaced from her regular spot. When she died in an isolated location, the women who knew her felt the connection immediately.

The law itself compounds the danger. Selling sex is legal; soliciting is not. When women feel hunted, they cannot rely on trusted regular clients. They take greater risks. They stop reporting smaller incidents — the warning signs, the patterns, the men circling. Intelligence dries up. The early warning system collapses. This is not a new lesson. In 2006, academics warned the government that abandoning managed tolerance zones would endanger women. The government piloted a crackdown in six cities. One was Ipswich. That autumn, five women were murdered there.

Some approaches have worked. Merseyside has treated violence against sex workers as a hate crime for twenty years, achieving a 67% rape conviction rate in its first decade. Leeds ran a managed zone from 2014 to 2021 that demonstrably saved lives. But these remain isolated experiments, not national policy. Funding for sex offender surveillance — the kind that might have flagged Levy — has been cut. The people doing the work are skilled and committed, but the resources grow thinner each year.

Since the murders, the Met has deployed specialist officers and partnered with local charities. National Ugly Mugs is running police education programmes on community liaison. Trust is being rebuilt — slowly, carefully, from a very low base. As the charity's chief executive observed, sex workers have only recently been spoken to at all. The question that remains is whether the system will listen to the women telling it where the danger is before the next predator finishes making his calculations.

Simon Levy walked into a Tottenham car park in August 2025 and murdered Sheryl Wilkins. He had already raped another woman there months earlier—a classical pianist trafficked from eastern Europe, known in court documents only as ED, who survived to testify that she would play music again and smile. Levy was a registered sex offender with a history of sexual violence stretching back to 2018. He chose his victims with deliberate calculation: women who sold sex, women he believed the system had already written off. In the end, he killed two—Carmenza Valencia-Trujillo and Sheryl Wilkins—before a rare whole life sentence stopped him. But the question that haunted the case was simpler and more damning: Why had Levy ever believed he could get away with it?

The answer lies not in any single failure but in a system-wide blindness. Women who sell sex face what researchers call endemic levels of violence. A snapshot survey across Scotland found that 90 percent had experienced violence, including attempted murder. A quarter had been sexually abused as children. Yet when National Ugly Mugs, a UK charity that documents violence against sex workers, processed 1,047 reports of varying severity last year, only 8 percent of those women consented to share the incidents with police. The gap between what happens and what gets reported is not a small oversight—it is a chasm that predators exploit.

The distrust is not paranoia. Women working the streets alongside Wilkins had spent a year complaining about police treatment before her death. The problem was a national framework called Clear, Hold, Build, introduced in 2023 to tackle organized crime but deployed against street-based sex work as a lower-level antisocial behaviour. Police created closure zones and arrested women for breaching them, supposedly to push them toward better-lit areas. What actually happened was different. Niki Adams of the English Collective of Prostitutes explained the mechanics: women try to work in pairs so they can signal when getting into a car with a client. The new policing strategy broke up those arrangements. Sheryl Wilkins was displaced from her regular spot on Fore Street. When she was killed in an isolated location, the women who had worked alongside her felt the connection immediately—they believed her death was a direct result of being pushed into danger by the very officers meant to protect her.

The pressure compounds. By law, selling sex is legal; soliciting it is not. When women feel hunted by police, they cannot work with regular clients they know and trust. They take risks they would otherwise avoid. They become more vulnerable. And crucially, they stop talking to police about the smaller incidents—the warning signs, the patterns, the predators circling. Intelligence dries up. The system loses its early warning system. Predators like Levy calculate that they can operate in the shadows.

The history here is long and instructive. In 2006, academics including forensic psychologist Belinda Brooks-Gordon wrote to the national media protesting the Labour government's plan to abandon managed tolerance zones in favour of a hardline approach. They warned it would be dangerous for women on the street. The government piloted a clampdown in six cities. One was Ipswich. That autumn, five women were murdered there. The pattern repeated: policy made without listening to the people most affected, implemented without resources, enforced without nuance, with bodies as the consequence.

Some models have worked. Merseyside has treated violence against sex workers as a hate crime for twenty years and achieved a 67 percent rape conviction rate in its first decade. Leeds ran the Holbeck experiment from 2014 to 2021, allowing street sex workers to operate freely between 8am and 6pm without fear of arrest—a managed zone that saved lives, as similar zones do in the Netherlands. But these remain exceptions. Funding has hollowed out. Surveillance of sex offenders on the register—like Levy—has been starved of resources. The people trying to do the work are energetic and well-trained, but the resources grow thinner.

Since the murders, the Met has sent specialist officers to repair the damage, working with local charities on safety and support. National Ugly Mugs is running education programmes for police forces about community liaison. But as the charity's chief executive Lynsey Walton noted, sex workers have only recently been spoken to at all. Building trust retrospectively, after decades of dismissal and harm, is possible—but it is also fragile and slow. The question that matters now is whether the system will listen to the women telling it where the danger is before the next predator calculates that he can get away with it.

Women try to work in pairs so they can indicate to somebody else when they're getting into a man's car. The new strategy broke up that arrangement.
— Niki Adams, English Collective of Prostitutes
How can our criminal justice system effectively identify and stop serial perpetrators if the people they target don't feel sufficiently safe to engage with it? Prevention requires us to take seriously the people who are telling us where the danger is.
— Lynsey Walton, National Ugly Mugs chief executive
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em The Guardian ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ