Judge acquits farm guard in teen's drowning death, finds prosecution case insufficient

A 13-year-old boy, Elijah Jabez Ekweny, drowned in River Sabwani on April 30, 2023, while fleeing from a farm guard armed with a machete.
The river was swollen and he did not see the deceased.
The guard's account of what happened in the water on the day the boy drowned.
Mark

So the guard was chasing kids who were stealing sugarcane. That part seems clear.

Mimi

Yes. Three of the four boys went into the plantation. Mukhanya confronted them with a machete. They ran toward the river.

Luke

And the river was already swollen—this wasn't a normal crossing.

Mimi

Correct. The water was fast-moving and dangerous. Two boys made it out. One didn't.

Mark

The prosecution said Mukhanya watched him drown and did nothing. What does the judge say about that?

Mimi

The judge says the evidence doesn't prove Mukhanya forced Ekweny into the water, or that he had a legal duty to risk his own life trying to rescue him from a swollen river.

Luke

But one of the boys testified that when he told Mukhanya someone was still in the water, Mukhanya said he'd get him later. That's a direct quote in the record.

Mimi

It is. And the judge considered it. But the judge found it didn't prove criminal intent or guilty conduct beyond reasonable doubt.

Mark

So the question becomes: what could Mukhanya actually have done?

Luke

That's the gap. We know he was there. We know a boy died. We don't know from this judgment whether Mukhanya could have saved him, or whether he tried.

Mimi

The judge essentially said the river was too dangerous and the circumstances too unclear to hold him criminally responsible.

Mark

And the father? What does he think?

Mimi

The record shows he testified that Mukhanya's actions caused his son's death. But the court didn't agree there was proof of that.

Luke

Three years of a case, and it ends with reasonable doubt. That's what the law allows.

  • A thirteen-year-old boy drowned in a fast-moving, rain-swollen river while fleeing a machete-wielding farm guard — and no one pulled him out in time.
  • For three years, a father sought accountability in court while the accused guard maintained he was simply doing his job protecting the farm from theft.
  • The prosecution argued the guard chased the boy into mortal danger and then stood by without raising an alarm or attempting a rescue, making him criminally responsible for the death.
  • The defense countered that the teenagers chose to jump into the river themselves, and that no guard could be legally required to risk his own life in such treacherous conditions.
  • Justice Robert Limo ruled the evidence insufficient to establish either guilty conduct or criminal intent, and Mukhanya walked free — leaving the community with a legal verdict but no shared sense of justice.

In the western Kenyan county of Trans Nzoia, a three-year legal reckoning over the drowning death of a thirteen-year-old boy came to a quiet close when a High Court acquitted the farm guard accused of chasing him into a swollen river. Justice Robert Limo found that the prosecution could not prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that Lazarus Khaoya Mukhanya bore criminal responsibility for the death of Elijah Jabez Ekweny — a boy who entered the water not because he was forced, but because he was afraid. The law rendered its verdict, yet the deeper questions of duty, fear, and what we owe one another in moments of danger remain unanswered in the community that witnessed it all.

On April 30, 2023, thirteen-year-old Elijah Jabez Ekweny was near a sugarcane plantation in Trans Nzoia county when three of his companions slipped inside to steal cane. Farm guard Lazarus Khaoya Mukhanya confronted them, machete in hand. The boys bolted toward River Sabwani, swollen and rushing from recent rains, and Mukhanya followed them into the water. Musumba was pulled out by the guard; Wafula made it across on his own. Ekweny did not surface. His body was recovered some 500 meters downstream, the cause of death determined to be drowning.

The state charged Mukhanya with murder, arguing he had driven the teenager into a deadly current and then watched without calling for help or attempting a rescue. Ekweny's father, Reverend Joseph Ekwen Jakait, testified and sought accountability. Mukhanya's defense was that he was protecting the farm, that he never forced anyone into the river, and that he had not even seen Ekweny in the water — only two boys, one of whom he saved.

On September 26, 2026, Justice Robert Limo acquitted Mukhanya, ruling that the prosecution had not proven guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no evidence that the guard had compelled the teenagers to enter the river — they had jumped in to escape capture. The judge further questioned whether a farm guard could be held legally obligated to risk his own life in such dangerous conditions. Three years of investigation, testimony, and grief concluded with an acquittal that settled the legal question while leaving the human one wide open.

On April 30, 2023, a thirteen-year-old boy named Elijah Jabez Ekweny went to graze livestock near a sugarcane plantation in Trans Nzoia county, in western Kenya. He and three friends—Peter Juma Musumba, Moses Wafula, and Sammy Chabeda Kibendi—were at the '40 Million farm' when three of them decided to slip into the nearby plantation to steal sugarcane, leaving Ekweny waiting by the roadside. What followed was a chase, a river crossing, and a death that would occupy a courtroom for three years.

Lazarus Khaoya Mukhanya, the guard employed to protect the sugarcane farm, confronted the teenagers while carrying a machete. The boys ran toward River Sabwani, which was swollen from recent rains and moving fast. Mukhanya pursued them into the water. According to testimony from Musumba, the guard pulled him from the river and Wafula managed to escape by crossing to the other side. But Ekweny did not emerge. When Musumba told Mukhanya that someone was still in the water, the guard replied that he would retrieve him later. The boy's body was found roughly 500 meters downstream. A postmortem examination determined the cause of death was asphyxia from drowning.

The state charged Mukhanya with murder. The prosecution's theory was straightforward: the guard had chased the teenager into the dangerous current and then stood by and watched him drown without attempting a rescue or even calling for help. Police testimony at trial stated that Mukhanya had seen the boys enter the river and made no effort to save the deceased or raise an alarm. The boy's father, Reverend Joseph Ekwen Jakait, testified that Mukhanya's actions had caused his son's death and sought accountability from the court.

Mukhanya's defense was equally direct. He said he was doing his job—protecting the farm from thieves. He denied forcing anyone into the water. His account held that he had seen two boys in the river and rescued Musumba while Wafula escaped on his own. The river was swollen and dangerous, he said, and he did not see Ekweny in the water. He also testified that he had warned one of the boys against jumping into the treacherous current.

On September 26, 2026, Justice Robert Limo delivered his ruling. The court found the prosecution had failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that nothing in the evidence showed Mukhanya had forced the boys—or Ekweny specifically—to jump into the swollen river. The teenagers had made that choice themselves to avoid being caught. The judge also observed that it was doubtful whether Mukhanya, as a farm guard, had any legal duty to risk his own life attempting a rescue in such dangerous conditions, or whether he would have been physically capable of doing so. The court concluded there was insufficient evidence that the accused bore criminal responsibility for the boy's death.

With that judgment, the case closed. Mukhanya walked free. The three years of legal proceedings—the investigation, the charges, the trial testimony, the postmortem findings—had led to an acquittal. For the community in Trans Nzoia county, the outcome settled nothing about what happened that day at River Sabwani, only that the law could not prove Mukhanya guilty of murder.

There is nothing that shows that the accused was responsible for the decision of the boys including the deceased to take the risk of jumping into a swollen river rather than being caught.
— Justice Robert Limo
It is also doubtful whether there was anything the accused could do to save the life of the deceased or to save him from drowning.
— Justice Robert Limo
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en the-star.co.ke ↗
Contáctanos FAQ