Jimmy Lai Found Guilty of National Security Offences in Hong Kong Trial Without Jury

Lai, 78, faces possible life imprisonment, and his son says his health is failing and he may die in prison.
A 156-day trial, no jury, and three guilty verdicts
Jimmy Lai, 78, was convicted in Hong Kong and could face life in prison at sentencing early next year.
Mark

Why does this verdict matter beyond Lai himself?

Mimi

Because it's the biggest test yet of the national security law. He was a billionaire publisher, and the court tied his newspaper to efforts to lobby for sanctions on Hong Kong and China.

Luke

Careful there. That's the court's finding. The article reports the judge's conclusions, but we haven't seen the evidence or the full judgment.

Mark

What did the judge actually say about him?

Mimi

That he made constant invitations to the US to help bring down the Chinese government, and that he was the mastermind behind plots against Beijing.

Luke

And Lai denied all the charges in his November testimony. Both of those things are on the record.

Mark

The trial had no jury. Does that change how we read it?

Mimi

It's why the US, Britain and the EU watched so closely. Fairness was the question before the verdict even came.

Luke

Worth noting the conviction rate figure, almost 100 per cent as of May, comes from the BBC's reporting. It's one source, though a notable one.

Mark

What about Lai's health?

Mimi

His son Sebastien says his body is breaking down and he fears he'll die in prison. Lai's lawyer said only that his spirit is okay.

Luke

The son's fear is a prediction, not a medical finding. We don't have independent health details, and we don't know yet if there will be an appeal or what the sentence will be.

  • Three guilty verdicts landed on Jimmy Lai, a 78-year-old tycoon whose sentence could keep him in prison for the rest of his life.
  • The judge framed his Apple Daily work as lobbying foreign powers for sanctions, a claim his defence and Western governments reject as persecution.
  • London's Foreign Secretary calls the prosecution politically motivated, while the opposition urges the Prime Minister to press Xi Jinping directly.
  • His family warns his health is failing, and with sentencing expected early next year, the clock on his release is running out.
  • Hong Kong's courts face fresh scrutiny over near-total conviction rates, and the next move belongs to his lawyers and an appeal yet to be decided.

On a Monday in Hong Kong's West Kowloon courthouse, a 78-year-old media figure who once stood at the centre of the city's public life heard three guilty verdicts read against him, closing a 156-day trial watched anxiously by governments far beyond the harbour. The case joins a long human story in which a newspaper, a fortune, and a voice for democracy became evidence in a contest between a city's freedoms and the power of the state that governs it. What comes next is a sentence still to be written early next year, and a judgment long enough that even his defenders must first learn its full shape.

On Monday, in the West Kowloon Law Courts Building, three guilty verdicts were read against Jimmy Lai, the 78-year-old British media tycoon and pro-democracy campaigner. Those who saw him described a man drawn and thin, and when he was led out he waved to his wife Teresa and one of his sons. The convictions cover two counts of conspiring to collude with foreign forces and one of conspiring to distribute seditious publications, offences that could keep him imprisoned for life. Sentencing is expected early next year.

Judge Esther Toh found that Lai had made "constant invitations" to the United States to help topple the Chinese government, and called him the "mastermind" of several plots. The court accepted that he had used Apple Daily, the tabloid he founded, to press foreign governments for sanctions against Hong Kong and China. Lai denied every charge when he testified in November. The trial lasted 156 days, with no jury, and was followed closely by the United States, Britain and the European Union, who questioned its fairness.

Lai was arrested in 2020, during a sweeping crackdown that followed huge anti-government protests. He had once been one of the city's most influential figures, a billionaire whose businesses included Giordano, Next Digital and Apple Daily. His lawyer, Robert Pang, said his client's spirit was "okay" and that the judgment was so long the defence would need time to study it, without confirming whether an appeal would follow.

His family's fears are stark. His son Sebastien told the BBC earlier this year that his father's body was breaking down and that, given his age and health, he would die in prison. In Britain, Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper called the case a politically motivated prosecution and demanded his immediate release, while Shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel urged Keir Starmer to raise the matter with Xi Jinping.

The verdict deepens doubts about Hong Kong's courts, which critics say have bent toward Beijing since 2019 and heavily favour prosecutors. Hundreds of protesters and activists have been jailed under the national security law, and defendants have faced a conviction rate of nearly 100 per cent. Now the questions are whether Lai will appeal, and what sentence he will receive when the court rules early next year.

On Monday, in a courtroom at the West Kowloon Law Courts Building, three guilty verdicts were read out against Jimmy Lai, the 78-year-old British media tycoon and pro-democracy campaigner. Sky News described him as looking drawn and thin. When the hearing ended and he was escorted out, Lai waved goodbye to his family, including his wife Teresa and one of his sons.

The court found him guilty on two counts of conspiracy to commit collusion with foreign forces to endanger national security, and on a third count of conspiracy to distribute seditious publications. The conviction could send him to prison for the rest of his life. Sentencing is expected early next year.

Judge Esther Toh ruled that Lai made "constant invitations" to the United States to help bring down the Chinese government. She also called him the "mastermind" behind several plots aimed at exposing the People's Republic of China and harming those in Beijing. The court accepted the argument that he used Apple Daily, the now-defunct tabloid he founded, as part of a major effort to lobby foreign governments to impose sanctions on Hong Kong and China. Lai had denied all the charges when he testified in November.

The trial ran for 156 days and was held without a jury. The United States, Britain and the European Union all watched it closely, concerned about its fairness. Lai was arrested in 2020, during a sweeping Chinese crackdown that followed massive anti-government protests in Hong Kong. At the time he was among the city's most powerful and influential figures, a billionaire whose businesses included Giordano and Next Digital as well as Apple Daily. Together they gave him a net worth of more than $1bn (£766m).

His lawyer, Robert Pang, spoke after the verdict and said Lai's "spirit is okay." He added that the judgment is so long that the defence will need time to study it. Pang did not say whether a formal appeal would be lodged before sentencing.

Lai's family has been open about their fears for his health. His son Sebastien told the BBC earlier this year that his father's body is breaking down. "Given his age, given his health… he will die in prison," he said.

The reaction in the UK was sharp. Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper condemned what she called a "politically motivated prosecution" and said Lai had been targeted by the Chinese and Hong Kong governments for peacefully exercising his right to freedom of expression. She said the National Security Law was imposed to silence China's critics, that the UK has repeatedly called for its repeal and for an end to prosecutions under it, and that Lai should be released immediately. Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel called the conviction "an outrage to democracy, personal freedom and liberty" and urged Sir Keir Starmer to raise the outcome with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Starmer had said at the end of 2024 that securing Lai's release was a priority for his Labour government. Mark Sabah, UK and Europe director of the Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation, called the trial a "show trial masquerading as justice."

The verdict adds to questions about Hong Kong's judicial system. Its courts have been accused of following Beijing's policies since 2019, when China tightened its control over the city. Officials insist they are simply applying the rules, but critics say the system heavily favours the prosecution. Hundreds of protesters and activists have been jailed under the national security law in recent years, and the BBC reported that, as of May this year, defendants faced a conviction rate of almost 100 per cent. What to watch next: whether Lai's lawyers appeal, and what sentence the court hands down early next year.

Given his age, given his health… he will die in prison.
— Sebastien Lai, son of Jimmy Lai, to the BBC
A politically motivated prosecution; Lai should be released immediately.
— Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper
Fale Conosco FAQ