Jay-Z's Lawyer Calls Rape Claim 'a Fantasy' and Says 'This Never Happened'

A woman says she was raped at age 13 at a 2000 MTV VMA afterparty, an allegation both Jay-Z and Combs deny.
"None of the details are right because this never happened."
Jay-Z's lawyer Alex Spiro rejected the accuser's timeline at a Roc Nation presentation for reporters.
Mark

Why does this particular press event matter?

Mimi

Because the defense chose to argue the facts in public, not just deny them. Spiro walked reporters through a timeline, the limo line, photographs, and travel time.

Luke

Worth noting that's one side's presentation, in a private room. The reporting doesn't say any of it has been tested in court.

Mark

Doe herself admitted inconsistencies, didn't she?

Mimi

To NBC News, yes, including about key corroborating witnesses. She said she made some mistakes but kept her accusation against Carter.

Luke

And that's where the line sits. Admitted inconsistencies are confirmed. Whether they undermine the core allegation is Spiro's claim and Buzbee's rebuttal, not a finding.

Mark

What does Buzbee say about how he vetted her?

Mimi

Four people at his firm interviewed her, a background check was run, and an investigator checked some details. He says the results matched her account and she signed two affidavits.

Luke

We only have his description of those results. The source doesn't say what the investigator found or what the affidavits contain.

Mark

And the extortion accusations?

Mimi

Carter's side sued Buzbee for extortion before the amended complaint. Buzbee calls that suit utterly frivolous.

Luke

Those are allegations flowing both ways. Nothing here establishes either one.

  • A lawyer clicks through a slide deck in a Roc Nation conference room, calling a rape lawsuit a fantasy and daring the court to let it crumble.
  • Photographs, timelines and a limousine line blocked by police are being marshaled to show that a 13-year-old's account of a 2000 VMA afterparty could not have happened.
  • The accuser admits her original story had inconsistencies about key witnesses, yet insists on her accusation and says she hopes to embolden others to speak.
  • Her attorney Tony Buzbee answers with vetting claims, an investigator's review and two sworn affidavits, while facing an extortion countersuit he calls frivolous.
  • Headed toward a motion to dismiss and a possible disciplinary fight, the case is landing in a contest over credibility, money and who is really on trial.

On a Monday in New York, the lawyer for Jay-Z stood before a small room of reporters and told them that a woman's claim he assaulted her at a 2000 awards-night afterparty was a fabrication, a story that could not survive the facts. The accuser, known in court only as Jane Doe, has stood by her account even as she concedes that earlier details were flawed, leaving a familiar human question open: whose memory and whose motive will a court ultimately credit. The case now rests on whether a judge finds the story holds together, and whether the fight over the lawyers who brought it becomes the story itself.

In a conference room at Roc Nation's New York offices on Monday, reporters watched Alex Spiro, Jay-Z's attorney, walk through a presentation meant to end a lawsuit. The case accuses the rapper of raping a 13-year-old girl at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards afterparty. Spiro called it a fantasy and said he expects it to be dismissed, or else to collapse on its own.

The accuser, identified in filings only as Jane Doe, first sued Sean Combs in October. Jay-Z, whose legal name is Shawn Carter, was added in an amended complaint, and he denied the allegation as soon as it appeared. Spiro built his case around her timeline, pointing to the police-guarded limousine line outside Radio City Music Hall, photographs of celebrities at a different afterparty, and travel times to the suburban venue. "None of the details are right because this never happened," he said.

Doe has conceded that her original story had inconsistencies, including about key witnesses, but she has kept her accusation. "I have made some mistakes," she said, hoping her words will give others courage. Spiro rejected that framing entirely.

His sharpest anger was aimed at her lawyer, Tony Buzbee of Houston, whom he accused of seeking money rather than justice. Buzbee says four people at his firm vetted Doe, that an experienced investigator checked parts of her account, and that she has signed two affidavits. "Our client remains adamant about her claim," he said.

Combs's lawyers called the suit a shameful money grab. Spiro says the court must now decide whether the case holds together, and whether his push for discipline against Buzbee goes anywhere.

In a conference room at Roc Nation's offices in New York City on Monday, a small group of reporters, CNN among them, watched a lawyer click through a PowerPoint presentation. The lawyer was Alex Spiro, who represents Jay-Z, and his subject was a lawsuit accusing the rapper of raping a 13-year-old girl at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards afterparty. "This is all a fantasy," he said. "We expect the case to be dismissed. If it's not, we expect this all to crumble."

The accuser is identified in court filings only as Jane Doe. She first sued Sean "Diddy" Combs in October. Jay-Z, whose given name is Shawn Carter, was not named in that original complaint. He appears in an amended complaint, which alleges that he and Combs assaulted her at the afterparty. Carter denied the allegation as soon as the amended filing appeared.

Spiro's walk-through was built around the timeline in her lawsuit, which he called demonstrably false. In the complaint, Doe says she met a limo driver outside Radio City Music Hall, where the awards were held. The driver said he worked for Combs, and she was taken to an afterparty. Spiro told the room that the limousine line was blocked off and guarded by police to keep the public out. He also showed photographs of Carter, Combs and other celebrities at a VMA afterparty held at a commercial establishment in New York City. And he argued that her account does not hold up because of the time it would take to travel from the city to the suburbs, where the alleged party took place.

"None of the details are right because this never happened," Spiro said. "When something isn't real and when something doesn't happen, you're going to get the details wrong because you weren't really there."

The presentation came days after Doe told NBC News that her original story contained inconsistencies, including about key corroborating witnesses. She maintained her accusation against Carter. "I have made some mistakes," she said, and added that she hopes to give others the strength to come forward. Spiro rejected the framing. "This is not an account of inconsistencies," he said. "This never happened. This is completely false."

Much of his anger was aimed at Doe's lawyer, Tony Buzbee of Houston. Spiro accused Buzbee of shaking down celebrities, saying, "This is not for truth and justice. This is for money." He had earlier accused Buzbee of trying to extort Carter before Carter was publicly named. Before the amended complaint was filed, Carter's lawyers sued Buzbee for extortion, alleging he was trying to shake down innocent celebrities, politicians and businesspeople with an army of masked accusers. Buzbee calls that suit utterly frivolous. Spiro has said he will ask the court to dismiss Doe's case and seek disciplinary action against Buzbee and his team.

Buzbee told CNN by email that the accusations against him and his client are baseless and that courts exist to resolve factual disputes. Asked about his vetting, he said four people at his firm interviewed Doe and checked details after another firm referred the original case. He said the firm ran a background check and hired a seasoned investigator to vet some of what she disclosed, and that the results were consistent with her account. Doe, he added, has signed two separate affidavits. "Our client remains adamant about her claim," he said.

Spiro said Carter is upset about being accused, that the case makes a mockery of the system, that it discourages real victims from coming forward, and that it burdens his kids and family. Lawyers for Combs, who has denied all civil allegations against him, told CNN: "This is the beginning of the end of this shameful money grab." Spiro also separated his client from Combs's mounting civil and criminal cases, saying the two knew each other professionally for a number of years and that any closer association is fiction.

What to watch now is whether the court dismisses the case, and whether Spiro's push for disciplinary action against Buzbee goes anywhere.

This is all a fantasy. We expect the case to be dismissed.
— Alex Spiro, attorney for Jay-Z
Our client remains adamant about her claim.
— Tony Buzbee, attorney for Jane Doe
Contáctanos FAQ