In the long and uneven history of accusation and accountability, a woman who alleged in 2024 that Jay-Z raped her as a child has now declared under oath that her claims were entirely without truth — that she never met the man she accused, and that a lawsuit was filed in her name before she had ever reviewed or approved it. The recantation, submitted to a federal court in New York as part of defamation proceedings the rapper brought against her, raises questions not about the accuser herself, but about the machinery that translated a Facebook form into a federal complaint. What remains is a cau
Jay-Z accuser recants rape allegation, says claims were false
I have never met or spoken to Mr Carter
Mark
So she filed a rape accusation, then withdrew it, and now she's saying it was all false. What changed her mind?
Mimi
According to her declaration, she's saying the law firm filed the case without her ever reviewing it. She saw a Facebook ad, filled out a form, and weeks later there was a lawsuit—but she never approved it.
Luke
That's her account now. But we should note: we don't have the law firm's side of this story. They haven't responded. And we don't know what conversations happened between her and the attorneys in those weeks.
Mark
Did she say why she's recanting now, specifically?
Mimi
The filing came as part of Jay-Z's defamation countersuit against her. So there's a legal incentive for her to recant.
Luke
Right. That's the crucial context. She's recanting in the middle of a lawsuit where Jay-Z is suing her for defamation. We can report what she said, but we can't know her full motivation from the documents alone.
Mark
Was she paid to recant?
Mimi
She stated in her declaration that she was not being paid for her statements.
Luke
Again, that's what she says now. But the fact that she's recanting during active litigation against her is worth holding in mind.
Mark
What about the Combs allegations?
Mimi
She recanted those too, saying Combs never raped her. But her original claim against him was separate from the case that led to his conviction and 50-month sentence.
Luke
So his conviction stands on different charges entirely. Her recantation doesn't affect that outcome.
O Pulso
- A woman who accused Jay-Z of rape in 2024 has now sworn under oath that every allegation she made was false and that she never met him at any point in her life.
- She says the lawsuit bearing her name was filed by a law firm without her ever reviewing the complaint — a process that began when she clicked on a Facebook ad seeking Diddy accusers.
- Jay-Z had countersued her and the law firm for defamation and malicious prosecution after she abandoned the original civil case, forcing the recantation into the public record.
- The woman also withdrew her allegations against Combs, though his 2025 criminal conviction on separate charges remains unaffected by her declaration.
- Jay-Z's legal team is now dropping her as a defendant, shifting the unresolved weight of the case squarely onto the law firm's conduct and due diligence — or the absence of it.
In the long and uneven history of accusation and accountability, a woman who alleged in 2024 that Jay-Z raped her as a child has now declared under oath that her claims were entirely without truth — that she never met the man she accused, and that a lawsuit was filed in her name before she had ever reviewed or approved it. The recantation, submitted to a federal court in New York as part of defamation proceedings the rapper brought against her, raises questions not about the accuser herself, but about the machinery that translated a Facebook form into a federal complaint. What remains is a cautionary portrait of how legal systems, grief, and opportunism can converge to cause harm in every direction.
A woman who in 2024 accused Jay-Z of raping her when she was 13 years old has now declared under oath that her allegations were entirely false. In a filing submitted to a US federal court in New York, she stated that she had never met Shawn Carter and that he had never behaved inappropriately toward her in any way.
Her account of how the lawsuit came to exist is striking in its own right. She says she encountered a Facebook advertisement placed by a law firm seeking people who believed they had been harmed by Sean Combs. The ad stirred something in her, she filled out an online form, and weeks later a lawsuit had been filed in her name — one she had never seen, reviewed, or approved. According to her declaration, the firm conducted no independent investigation, no background inquiry, and sought no corroboration before submitting the original complaint.
The original suit, filed in October 2024, named both Jay-Z and Combs as defendants. She later dropped it. Jay-Z then countersued her and the law firm for defamation and malicious prosecution — and it was in response to that countersuit that she came forward with her recantation. She also withdrew her allegations against Combs, though his separate 2025 criminal conviction on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution stands independent of her claims.
Jay-Z's legal team announced they would drop the woman as a defendant, directing attention toward the law firm whose handling of the original complaint now sits at the centre of unresolved legal questions.
A woman who filed a rape accusation against Jay-Z in 2024 has now declared under oath that her allegations were entirely false. In a court filing submitted Thursday as part of defamation proceedings the rapper initiated against her, she stated plainly: there was no truth to any of her claims, she had never met Shawn Carter, and he had never engaged in any inappropriate conduct toward her.
The woman, identified as Jane Doe in court documents, had originally sued both Jay-Z and Sean "Diddy" Combs in October 2024, alleging they raped her in 2000 when she was 13 years old. She later abandoned that civil lawsuit. Jay-Z then countersued her and her law firm for defamation and malicious prosecution. It was in response to that countersuit that she filed her recantation declaration in US District Court for the Southern District of New York.
According to her account, the sequence of events began when she saw a Facebook advertisement placed by a law firm seeking information from anyone who believed they had been harmed by Combs. The ad, she said, triggered memories of being raped at age 13. She filled out an online form provided by the firm and was subsequently contacted by an attorney. Weeks later, a lawsuit was filed on her behalf—but she had never been shown a draft of the complaint for her review or approval.
In her declaration, the woman stated that the law firm had filed the case "without conducting any independent investigation, background inquiry, or due diligence, and without obtaining any corroboration of the allegations" before submitting the original complaint. She also clarified that she had not been paid for her statements and that she had never met or spoken with Jay-Z at any point.
The woman similarly recanted her allegations against Combs, stating he had not raped her. Her original claim against Combs was unrelated to the separate case that resulted in his 2025 conviction on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, for which he received a 50-month prison sentence.
Jay-Z's legal team announced they were dropping the woman as a defendant in the defamation action. Representatives for the rapper declined to comment. Attorneys for Combs did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the recantation.
Citações Notáveis
There was no truth to any of my claims against Jay-Z, and I was not being paid for my statements— The accuser, in her court declaration
The law firm filed the case without conducting any independent investigation, background inquiry, or due diligence, and without obtaining any corroboration of the allegations— The accuser, describing the law firm's process
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em ABC News & Headlines – Australian Broadcasting Corporation ↗