Japan's Crown Prince Signals Discomfort With Male-Only Succession Law

I have mixed feelings about it, and it's rather strange if I don't
Crown Prince Akishino carefully expressed doubt about the male-only succession law while constrained by his position as an imperial family member.
Mark

So the Crown Prince basically said he disagrees with the law his own government just passed. How is that even allowed?

Mimi

He was very careful about it. He didn't say he disagrees—he said he has "mixed feelings" and that he can't really talk about it. But yes, the fact that he said anything at all is significant. Imperial family members are supposed to stay out of politics.

Luke

But did he actually say anything substantive? "Mixed feelings" and "society needs progress" could mean almost anything. We don't know if he thinks the law should be reversed, or if he just wishes the government had consulted the family more.

Mimi

That's fair. He's constrained by his position. But the timing matters—he said this right after the law passed, and he specifically mentioned that there's no difference between men and women in serving the imperial family. That's a direct statement about the core principle the law just enshrined.

Mark

And Princess Aiko is his niece, right? So this is personal for him too.

Mimi

Yes. She's 24, hugely popular, and completely excluded from succession because she's a woman. The throne will go to Akishino, then to his teenage son, then to a 90-year-old uncle. The family is shrinking and aging, and the law just made the problem worse by narrowing who can inherit.

Luke

But we should be careful here—we don't know if Akishino thinks Aiko should be empress. He didn't say that. He said there's no difference between men and women in serving the imperial family, which is different from saying women should be able to become emperor.

Mimi

True. But in context, that statement is pretty clearly a critique of the male-only rule. Why else would he say it right after the law passed?

Mark

What about the adoption provision? That seems like a strange solution to the succession problem.

Mimi

It allows the government to adopt distant male relatives into the immediate royal family to produce heirs. But only if they're male and trace their line through the father. So it's designed to solve the shortage of male heirs without actually changing the principle that only men can rule.

Luke

And we don't know yet if that will even work. The family is still shrinking. Adopting a 15-year-old distant relative is not the same as having a stable succession plan.

Mark

Has Japan always had this male-only rule?

Mimi

No. Japan has had eight female emperors. The last one ruled in the 1700s. The male-only rule was written into law in 1890, when Japan was promoting patriarchal systems. It carried over into the current law in 1947.

Luke

So this isn't ancient tradition—it's a 130-year-old policy that was deliberately chosen for political reasons.

Mimi

Exactly. And the current emperor's father tried to modernize the monarchy and make it more connected to the people. This new law seems to push in the opposite direction.

  • Japan's conservative government has enshrined a male-only succession rule into law, directly excluding 24-year-old Princess Aiko — widely beloved and widely seen as a natural heir — from ever ascending the throne.
  • Crown Prince Akishino, the man who will almost certainly become emperor, publicly broke from the government's position, saying he sees no difference between men and women in serving the imperial family — a statement that is quietly extraordinary for someone in his role.
  • Protests have erupted over the law, with critics calling it not merely outdated but a deliberate act of gender discrimination, one that codifies patriarchal hierarchy into the very institution meant to embody the nation.
  • The succession math has grown precarious: the throne is set to pass through Akishino to his 19-year-old son, and then to a 90-year-old uncle — a thinning line that the new law attempts to address by allowing adoption of distant male relatives rather than recognizing female heirs.
  • Japan's own history complicates the government's certainty — the country has had eight female monarchs, and the male-only rule itself dates only to 1890, a product of deliberate patriarchal policy rather than ancient tradition.

In Japan, where the imperial institution is expected to speak with one voice — the voice of continuity — Crown Prince Akishino has introduced something rare: a note of doubt. Standing before cameras on Thursday, the man next in line to the Chrysanthemum Throne said he harbors 'mixed feelings' about a newly passed law that restricts imperial succession to men, excluding his own popular niece, Princess Aiko, from ever becoming empress. His words were careful, bounded by the constraints of his position, yet they land with unusual weight in a country where the royal family is shrinking, the succession line is aging, and a conservative government has just answered one of Japan's oldest institutional questions by reaching further into the past.

On Thursday, Crown Prince Akishino did something members of Japan's imperial family are rarely supposed to do: he expressed doubt about his own government's law. Speaking at a news conference before a trip to Paraguay, the younger brother of Emperor Naruhito and next in line for the throne said he has 'mixed feelings' about a newly passed revision to the Imperial House Law — one that restricts imperial succession exclusively to men. 'I believe there is no difference between men and women' in fulfilling the duties of the imperial family, he said, before acknowledging the bind he was in: 'It is a difficult question, and the reality is that I can't talk about it.'

What he could not fully say, the law makes plain. The revision excludes Princess Aiko — his niece, 24 years old, and among the most popular members of the royal family — from the line of succession entirely. The crown will instead pass from Emperor Naruhito to Akishino, then to Akishino's 19-year-old son Prince Hisahito, and after him to the emperor's 90-year-old uncle. The imperial family is shrinking, and the new law has made it smaller still.

The revision contains two provisions. The first allows princesses who marry commoners to retain their imperial status — a modest concession that still excludes their husbands and children from the royal family. The second, more contentious measure permits the adoption of distant male relatives into the immediate royal family, provided their lineage runs through the paternal line. It is a mechanism designed to manufacture heirs rather than recognize the ones already present.

Critics have taken to the streets, arguing the law is not simply anachronistic but deliberately constructed to remove Princess Aiko from power while cementing gender discrimination into national law. The historical irony is sharp: Japan has had eight female monarchs, the most recent ruling from 1762 to 1770. The male-only rule itself dates only to 1890, written into law during an era when Japan was actively promoting patriarchal systems — and carried largely unchanged into the current Imperial House Law of 1947.

Akishino's public ambivalence carries unusual weight precisely because he is not supposed to have it. Imperial family members are expected to stand above politics, to embody the institution rather than question it. Yet here was the future emperor saying that society must continue to progress, that diverse viewpoints matter. He was threading a needle — acknowledging the legitimacy of the debate without directly confronting the government that had just closed it. Against the backdrop of former Emperor Akihito's decades-long effort to modernize and humanize the monarchy, the new law sits uneasily. What the government has now fixed in place, the next emperor appears to be quietly, carefully, questioning.

Crown Prince Akishino stood before cameras on Thursday and said something a member of Japan's imperial family is rarely supposed to say: that he harbors doubts about the government's own law. The younger brother of Emperor Naruhito, and next in line for the throne, expressed what he called "mixed feelings" about a revision to the Imperial House Law that the conservative government of Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi had just pushed through—a revision that enshrines a principle as old as modern Japan itself: only men can become emperor.

"I believe there is no difference between men and women" in fulfilling the roles required of the imperial family, Akishino said at a news conference held ahead of a trip to Paraguay to commemorate the 90th anniversary of Japanese emigration there. The statement was careful, measured, the language of someone acutely aware of the constraints placed on his position. He acknowledged the tension directly: "I have mixed feelings about it, and it's rather strange if I don't." Yet he also retreated into the bounds of what an imperial family member can safely say. "It is a difficult question, and the reality is that I can't talk about it."

What Akishino could not fully articulate, the law itself makes brutally clear. The revision excludes his own niece, Princess Aiko, from the line of succession. She is 24 years old, widely popular across Japan, and by most measures the person many Japanese citizens would prefer to see inherit the throne. But she is a woman, and under the new rule, that disqualifies her entirely. Instead, the crown will pass from Naruhito to Akishino, then to Akishino's 19-year-old son, Prince Hisahito. After him comes the emperor's 90-year-old uncle. The math is stark: the imperial family is shrinking, aging, and the law has just made it smaller still.

The revision itself contains two major changes. The first allows princesses who marry commoners to retain their imperial status and continue performing royal duties—a modest concession that nonetheless keeps their husbands and children outside the royal family entirely. The second, more controversial provision permits the adoption of unmarried male descendants, aged 15 or older, from distant branches of the imperial line into the immediate royal family, but only if they trace their lineage through the paternal line. This mechanism is designed to produce heirs, to solve the succession crisis by reaching into the family tree and pulling down distant male relatives.

The law has ignited protests. Critics argue it is not merely anachronistic but deliberately constructed to eliminate Princess Aiko from power while simultaneously codifying discrimination against women and cementing a patriarchal system into law. The irony is not lost on observers: Japan has had eight female monarchs in its history. The most recent was Empress Gosakuramachi, who ruled from 1762 to 1770. The male-only succession rule itself is far younger than the institution it governs—it was first written into law in 1890, when Japan was actively promoting patriarchal systems. That 1890 law was largely carried forward into the current Imperial House Law of 1947, where it has remained ever since.

Akishino's public ambivalence carries weight precisely because he is not supposed to have it. Imperial family members are expected to remain above politics, to embody the institution rather than critique it. Yet here was the man who will almost certainly be emperor, saying that society must continue to progress, that people with different views should keep thinking about what is best. He was threading a needle—acknowledging the legitimacy of the question without directly challenging the government that had just answered it.

There is also a shadow cast by history. Former Emperor Akihito, who abdicated in 2019, spent his reign trying to bring the monarchy closer to the Japanese people, to make amends for the legacy of the Second World War and to modernize an institution that had long seemed distant and untouchable. His son Naruhito has followed that path. The new succession law, with its emphasis on patriarchal bloodline and its exclusion of a popular female heir, sits uneasily against that legacy of opening and reconciliation. What the government has solidified in law, the next emperor appears to be quietly questioning.

I believe there is no difference between men and women in serving the roles of the imperial family to respond to social needs
— Crown Prince Akishino
The society needs to keep making progress, and I believe it is important for people with different views to keep thinking what's best
— Crown Prince Akishino
Contattaci Domande frequenti