Japanese anime star sues TikTok over AI voice cloning in landmark case

A voice is the symbol of one's personality, protected by law.
Japan's justice ministry clarified that voice falls under existing publicity rights protections, though enforcement remains untested.
Mark

So Tsuda is suing TikTok because someone used an AI version of his voice to narrate videos. But the account is already gone—what's he actually asking the court to do?

Mimi

The account was deleted, yes, but the lawsuit is about whether TikTok should have been held responsible for hosting it in the first place. He's also asserting that his voice is his property, protected under publicity rights.

Luke

Right, but here's the thing—TikTok says the voice is generic. We don't have audio samples in the reporting, so we're taking Tsuda's word that it's distinctively his. That's a factual question the court has to answer.

Mimi

Fair point. But the account did have 200,000 subscribers and made real money—upwards of $3,200 a month. That's not nothing.

Mark

And TikTok's argument is basically that it's just a platform, not responsible for what users post?

Mimi

Exactly. They're saying they provide a forum for creative content within free speech protections. They're also questioning whether Tsuda even qualifies as having "national fame" under Japanese law.

Luke

Which is interesting because he's the voice of a major character in "Jujutsu Kaisen," a show that's globally recognized. But "national fame" is a legal term with a specific meaning in Japan, and we don't know how the court defines it.

Mark

What happens if Tsuda wins?

Mimi

It could set a precedent that voices are protected intellectual property. The Japan Actors Union is watching closely—they're worried that if TikTok wins, AI voice cloning will explode on social media.

Luke

But the justice ministry already published guidelines last month saying voice is protected under publicity rights. So the legal framework might already exist. The question is whether the court will enforce it.

Mark

Does this matter outside Japan?

Mimi

Absolutely. The International Federation of Actors says copyright laws worldwide aren't keeping up with AI. OpenAI had to apologize to Scarlett Johansson over a synthetic voice. This case could influence how other countries think about voice ownership.

Luke

Though we should note—those guidelines are non-binding. And Ueno, the IP professor, says it's "very unlikely" Tsuda will be outright denied publicity rights, but that's his prediction, not a certainty.

  • Kenjiro Tsuda, voice of major characters in 'Jujutsu Kaisen' and 'Yu-Gi-Oh!', sued TikTok over AI-cloned voice videos
  • Anonymous account generated 200,000+ subscribers and estimated 500,000 yen ($3,200) monthly revenue
  • Believed to be Japan's first lawsuit defending individual vocal identity against AI cloning
  • Court ruling expected Wednesday; justice ministry published non-binding voice protection guidelines in August

Kenjiro Tsuda, known for 'Jujutsu Kaisen' and 'Yu-Gi-Oh!', claims TikTok hosted videos with an AI clone of his voice that generated significant revenue without permission. The case highlights growing concerns across Japan's animation industry about AI voice cloning, with the Japan Actors Union arguing voice is a fundamental right requiring legal protection.

A prominent Japanese anime voice actor is suing TikTok over AI-generated videos using a clone of his distinctive voice, in what's believed to be Japan's first case defending vocal identity against AI copies.

Kenjiro Tsuda, a voice actor whose baritone has defined characters in some of anime's biggest franchises, walked into Tokyo District Court this week to argue that his voice is his own—and that TikTok had no right to let someone else profit from a synthetic copy of it.

Tsuda is known for roles in "Jujutsu Kaisen" and "Yu-Gi-Oh!", shows watched by millions. An anonymous account on TikTok, using an avatar that resembled one of his characters, began posting videos narrated in a voice Tsuda says is unmistakably his: deep, distinctive, trained over decades. The videos mixed images with AI-generated speech about urban legends and conspiracy theories. The account accumulated more than 200,000 subscribers and generated an estimated 500,000 yen—roughly $3,200—in monthly revenue. None of that money went to Tsuda. The account has since been removed, but the question of who bears responsibility for it remains.

This is believed to be Japan's first lawsuit defending an individual's vocal identity against AI cloning. It arrives at a moment when the country's animation industry is grappling with a technology that can replicate what voice actors spend years perfecting. Yuko Sasaki, executive director of the Japan Actors Union and herself a voice actor, told reporters that a performer's voice is "the result of years of rigorous training and apprenticeship." The union has thrown its weight behind Tsuda's case, arguing that voice ownership should be recognized as a fundamental right. A parallel campaign called "No More" has mobilized other performers against unauthorized AI voice mimicry.

TikTok's defense is straightforward: the voice in question is generic, the platform argues, and any similarity to Tsuda's is subjective. The company has also questioned whether Tsuda qualifies as having "national fame"—a legal threshold that matters in Japan's unfair competition laws. More broadly, TikTok contends it is simply a host for user-generated content, protected by free speech principles. The platform says it did nothing more than provide a forum where users could post creative material.

The stakes extend far beyond one actor or one platform. Japan has no explicit law protecting a person's voice, though the justice ministry published non-binding guidelines last month clarifying that voice falls under existing protections for publicity rights and the right to prevent unauthorized use of one's likeness. Whether those guidelines will shape Wednesday's verdict is unclear. Tatsuhiro Ueno, a professor of intellectual property law at Waseda University, believes it is "very unlikely" that Tsuda will be denied publicity rights altogether, given his prominence. He also predicts the ruling will draw international attention, particularly because Tsuda's role in "Jujutsu Kaisen" has made his voice recognizable across Europe and beyond.

The case reflects a broader anxiety rippling through entertainment industries worldwide. OpenAI apologized in 2024 after releasing a synthetic voice resembling Scarlett Johansson without her consent. The International Federation of Actors warned last year that copyright and data protection laws in many countries are not keeping pace with generative AI technology. In Japan's animation sector, the concern is acute. Actor Bin Shimada, part of the "No More" campaign, warned that if TikTok prevails, "unbridled" AI voice cloning could follow, potentially discouraging younger performers from entering the field.

Yet some in the industry hold a different view. Michihiro Ikemizu, an 83-year-old veteran voice actor, expressed solidarity with Tsuda but also confidence that AI, no matter how sophisticated, cannot replicate what human performers bring to their work. "You need to constantly feel and adapt while performing your role," Ikemizu said. "That's something AI can never do. That's our only weapon." The court's decision on Wednesday will determine not whether that weapon remains effective, but whether the law recognizes that voice actors have the right to wield it.

A voice is the result of years of rigorous training and apprenticeship. It's something we spend lots of time and money perfecting.
— Yuko Sasaki, executive director of the Japan Actors Union
You need to constantly feel and adapt while performing your role. That's something AI can never do.
— Michihiro Ikemizu, veteran voice actor
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en afp.com ↗
Contáctanos FAQ