Japan tightens permanent residency rules amid rising anti-immigration sentiment

Hundreds of foreign residents rushed to file permanent residency applications before fee increases took effect, with some waiting five hours to complete procedures.
The window was closing, and the cost of passage was about to rise.
Hundreds of foreign residents rushed to file permanent residency applications before Japan's new fee structure took effect.
Mark

Why would Japan make it harder to become a permanent resident when the country is aging and needs workers?

Mimi

Because public anxiety about immigration has grown faster than the economic argument for it. The government is responding to what voters say they feel, not just what demographers say they need.

Luke

But we should be careful here—do we know how widespread the anxiety actually is? The article mentions false claims circulating on social media, but it doesn't quantify how many Japanese citizens actually oppose immigration.

Mark

The Sanseito party's rise in last year's election seems like evidence though, doesn't it?

Mimi

It does suggest real political momentum. But one party's gains don't tell us the full picture of public opinion. It's one data point.

Luke

Exactly. And the article doesn't give us polling numbers or demographic breakdowns of who supports or opposes these changes. We're working with anecdotes and political signals.

Mark

So what's the actual human cost here? Who gets hurt by these new rules?

Mimi

Foreign residents who were planning to apply for permanent residency—they lose access to mortgages, employment flexibility, and a form of belonging. The fee jump alone prices out people with lower incomes. And the income threshold requirement means lower-wage workers, even if they've lived here for years, may not qualify.

Luke

Though the article does say the rules "should not immediately push anyone out of the country." So it's more about blocking future applications and making the path harder, not deportation.

Mark

What do the people actually living through this think?

Mimi

Chono's quote is telling—he sees both sides but worries the momentum for diversity has stalled. He's fluent in Japanese, he's been here a decade, and even he's uncertain about the country's direction.

Luke

And he's exactly the kind of person these rules might not stop—he can probably meet the income and language thresholds. The people most affected are those who can't.

  • A twentyfold fee increase, new income thresholds, and mandatory Japanese language skills have transformed permanent residency from a difficult goal into a near-exclusive one overnight.
  • Hundreds of foreign residents flooded Tokyo immigration offices in the final days before the rules took effect, some waiting five hours just to preserve access to the old, more affordable system.
  • The policy reflects a sharp rightward shift in public sentiment, amplified by the Sanseito party's 'Japanese-first' platform and viral misinformation linking foreigners to welfare dependency and crime.
  • Business leaders and economists are sounding the alarm: without sustained immigration, Japan's aging economy cannot sustain itself, yet policy is moving in precisely the opposite direction.
  • For foreign residents, permanent status is not merely a legal category — it unlocks mortgages, employment freedom, and social belonging, all of which now sit behind a much higher wall.

On the first of October, Japan drew a sharper line between those it will welcome to stay and those it will keep at arm's length, raising the cost — in money, language, and income — of belonging. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's new permanent residency rules arrive at a moment of demographic contradiction: a nation growing older and emptier is nonetheless tightening the door against those who might fill its workforce and its streets. It is a tension as old as migration itself — the fear of the stranger set against the need for the stranger — and Japan is now choosing, at least for now, which side of that tension to honor.

On October 1st, Japan's government made permanent residency substantially harder to obtain for foreign residents. Under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, new rules now require applicants to earn above the national average income, demonstrate conversational Japanese, show pension contributions equivalent to thirty years in the system, and pay a fee that leapt from 10,000 yen to 200,000 yen — a twentyfold increase.

The days before the rules took effect saw an immediate human response. At a central Tokyo immigration office, hundreds of people queued for hours to file under the old system. Among them was Yujie Chono, a 22-year-old American-born university student who spent five hours waiting. Fluent in Japanese and a decade-long resident, he gave voice to the central contradiction: Japan's shrinking, aging population creates real labor shortages, yet public sentiment has turned sharply against the foreign workers those shortages demand.

Takaichi framed the changes as enabling 'orderly coexistence,' acknowledging that a growing foreign population has stirred 'anxiety and a sense of unfairness' among Japanese citizens. The political current behind her is unmistakable. Last year's upper house elections saw the rise of the Sanseito party, which calls immigration a 'silent invasion,' and anti-immigration messaging — often built on false claims about welfare use and public safety — has spread widely on social media.

The business community sees the situation differently. The Nikkei recently urged Japan to stop treating foreign workers as temporary and instead invest in their integration through language education and better working conditions. Many economists warn that without sustained immigration, Japan's economy and social systems face serious strain. Yet policy continues moving the other way, with the ruling Liberal Democratic Party also tightening business manager visas.

The new rules will not displace anyone already living in Japan, but they will deter future applications and raise the barriers to the stability that permanent residency provides. For those who stood in line in Tokyo, the message needed no translation: the window was closing, and the cost of staying had just risen sharply.

On Thursday, October 1st, Japan's government made it substantially harder for foreign residents to secure permanent residency status. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, responding to what she describes as growing public anxiety about immigration, introduced a package of new requirements that will roll out in stages. The changes demand that applicants prove their annual income exceeds the national average, demonstrate they can hold casual conversations in Japanese, and pay a fee that has jumped from 10,000 yen to 200,000 yen—a twentyfold increase.

The timing created immediate pressure. At an immigration office in central Tokyo, hundreds of people lined up in the days before the new rules took effect, racing to submit applications under the old fee structure. Yujie Chono, a 22-year-old American-born university student, spent five hours waiting to file his paperwork. Speaking fluent Japanese, he articulated the tension at the heart of Japan's immigration debate: the country's shrinking and aging population creates genuine labor shortages across many industries, yet public sentiment has turned sharply against accepting more foreigners.

The previous system had been vague. It did not specify income thresholds, pension requirements, or language proficiency levels. Under the new rules, applicants must demonstrate pension benefits equivalent to someone who has paid into the system for thirty years and show they understand Japanese social norms. For many foreign residents, permanent residency represents more than status—it provides access to mortgages, employment flexibility, and a form of social belonging that temporary visa holders cannot easily obtain.

Takaichi framed the tightening as necessary governance. In a post on X, she acknowledged that as the foreign population grows, Japanese citizens increasingly feel "anxiety and a sense of unfairness." She positioned the new rules as enabling "orderly coexistence" rather than wholesale rejection. Yet the political backdrop is unmistakable. Last year's upper house election saw the sharp rise of the Sanseito party, which campaigns on a "Japanese-first" platform and describes immigration as a "silent invasion." Anti-immigration messaging has flourished on social media, often accompanied by false claims—that foreigners consume a disproportionate share of Japan's welfare spending, that they make streets less safe.

Chono, who has lived in Japan for a decade, acknowledged both sides of the argument. He recognized the cultural anxiety driving the policy shift but also warned that Japan needs young people "to support its future." He observed that momentum toward cultural diversity, which had seemed to build in recent years, has stalled.

The business community and economic analysts are sounding a different alarm. The Nikkei business daily recently published an editorial urging Japan to stop treating foreigners as temporary labor and instead invest in their long-term integration through expanded Japanese-language education and improved working conditions. Many business leaders argue that without sustained immigration, Japan cannot sustain its economy or social systems. Yet policy is moving in the opposite direction. Earlier, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party tightened regulations for business manager visas, forcing entrepreneurs to leave if they fail to meet new conditions.

The new permanent residency rules will not immediately expel anyone already in the country, but they will likely deter applications and make it harder for foreign residents to achieve the stability and social standing that permanent status provides. The fee increase alone—from roughly $80 to $1,275—creates a significant barrier. For those waiting in line at the Tokyo immigration office, the message was clear: the window was closing, and the cost of passage was about to rise.

I understand that over-accepting foreigners might dilute Japan's unique culture. But at the same time, given its low birth rate and ageing population, Japan has to accept foreigners.
— Yujie Chono, 22-year-old permanent residency applicant
Japan should stop viewing foreigners merely as a temporary labour force and instead promote their long-term settlement by expanding Japanese-language education and improving their treatment.
— Nikkei business daily editorial
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em CNA ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ