Japan, China hold maritime talks as Beijing simulates Taiwan attack

Diplomacy proceeding in parallel with military posturing
Japan and China maintain regular talks even as Beijing conducts military exercises, trying to manage competition without conflict.
Mark

So they're talking while China is literally running war games. How does that work?

Mimi

It's not as contradictory as it sounds. The talks are part of a standing dialogue that goes back over a decade. Both sides understand that some level of military posturing is going to happen. The question is whether they can keep it from turning into something uncontrolled.

Luke

But we should be clear about what the timing means. China scheduled those exercises specifically because of Tsai's visit to the U.S. It's not coincidence—it's a message.

Mimi

Right. And Japan understood that message. That's why Matsuno made that statement about the Taiwan Strait mattering for international stability. He was saying: we see what you're doing, and we think it's significant.

Mark

What's actually at stake in these waters?

Mimi

Sovereignty over some islands, but also something bigger—the principle of whether China can use military pressure to change the status quo in the region. If it works with Taiwan, it could embolden similar moves elsewhere.

Luke

Though we should note: the U.S. commitment to defend the islands is stated policy, but it's not automatic. There's still room for interpretation about what would actually trigger that commitment.

Mark

And the hotline they set up—does that actually prevent anything?

Mimi

It's a pressure valve. When coast guard ships are facing off, or when planes come close, having a direct line means someone can pick up a phone instead of letting things escalate through normal channels.

Luke

It's also a sign that both sides recognize the risk is real. You don't set up a hotline unless you're worried about accidents becoming incidents.

Mark

So what happens next?

Mimi

This is the pattern now. China does exercises, Japan watches and comments, they meet and talk, and then it happens again. The question is whether that pattern holds or whether one side miscalculates.

  • China launched sweeping military drills around Taiwan immediately after President Tsai met U.S. House Speaker McCarthy, treating the visit as a direct provocation requiring a forceful response.
  • Japan's government declared it was watching the exercises 'with great interest,' framing Taiwan Strait stability not as a regional preference but as a condition for international order.
  • Beneath the diplomatic pleasantries, old wounds remained open — at their last meeting, China had rebuked Japan for commenting on Taiwan and demanded its ships withdraw from contested East China Sea waters.
  • A newly established military hotline between the two nations offers a thin but deliberate lifeline — a channel designed to stop an incident at sea from becoming something neither side can walk back.
  • Diplomacy and military posturing ran on parallel tracks Monday, each side performing resolve while leaving just enough room to avoid the collision both claim they do not want.

As Chinese warships and aircraft encircled Taiwan in simulated strikes, diplomats from Japan and China met in a long-standing maritime dialogue — a quiet reminder that even rival powers understand the value of a table to sit across. The exercises, Beijing's response to Taiwan's president meeting with American lawmakers, unfolded alongside talks meant to govern the very waters where such tensions could one day turn catastrophic. In the space between military demonstration and diplomatic conversation, both nations are navigating the oldest of human tensions: how to signal strength without surrendering the possibility of peace.

On a Monday in April, as Chinese fighter jets and naval vessels conducted simulated strikes around Taiwan, senior diplomats from Japan and China sat down to discuss how to prevent a collision at sea. The meeting was part of a dialogue running since 2012, a regular channel for managing friction between two major powers in one of the world's most contested waterways — but the timing gave it an unmistakable edge.

The exercises were Beijing's answer to Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen's recent meeting with U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, which China condemned as interference in what it considers an internal matter. China's Hong Liang arrived at the talks calling for cooperation and an "in-depth conversation," while warplanes and warships simultaneously rehearsed strikes on the island — a demonstration of resolve staged in deliberate parallel with the diplomacy.

Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno told reporters Tokyo was monitoring the drills closely, and framed the stakes carefully: stability in the Taiwan Strait was not merely Japan's concern, but a condition for the stability of the entire international community. It was a measured statement — not an accusation, but a signal.

The two nations carry a long history of friction in these waters. The East China Sea holds islands Japan calls the Senkaku and China calls the Diaoyu, with coast guard vessels from both sides regularly circling each other nearby. At their November meeting, China had criticized Japan for speaking about Taiwan and demanded Tokyo pull its ships from the disputed seas. The United States, meanwhile, has made clear it would treat any Chinese seizure of those islands as an attack on an ally — a commitment that shapes every encounter in the region.

Small efforts to contain the risk are visible. Last month, the two countries established a military hotline to help defuse air and sea incidents before they escalate. The Monday meeting itself was another such effort — diplomacy running alongside military posturing, both sides signaling resolve while leaving the door open to managing their rivalry without letting it become war.

On a Monday in April, as Chinese fighter jets and naval vessels maneuvered in formation around Taiwan, senior diplomats from Japan and China sat down across a table to talk about how to avoid a collision at sea. The meeting was part of a dialogue that has continued since 2012, a regular channel meant to manage the friction between two major powers in one of the world's most contested waterways. But the timing was pointed. Taiwan's president, Tsai Ing-wen, had just returned from the United States, where she met with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy—a visit Beijing treated as a provocation, a breach of what it considers its internal affairs. The military exercises were China's answer.

Hong Liang, who leads China's boundary and ocean affairs division at the foreign ministry, arrived at the talks with a stated goal: cooperation. He wanted, he said, an "in-depth conversation" with his Japanese counterpart, Takehiro Funakoshi, who directs Japan's Asian and Oceanian affairs. But the subtext was harder to ignore. China views Taiwan as a renegade province and has never renounced the use of force to bring it under control. The wargames happening simultaneously—with Chinese warplanes and ships simulating strikes on the island—were a demonstration of that resolve, timed to coincide with the diplomatic meeting.

Japan's government was watching closely. Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno told reporters that Tokyo had been monitoring China's drills "with great interest." More pointedly, he framed the stakes in regional terms: stability in the Taiwan Strait mattered not just for Japan's security, but for the stability of the entire international community. It was a careful statement—not an accusation, but a signal that Japan saw what was happening and considered it significant.

The two nations have a long history of friction in these waters. The East China Sea contains disputed territory that both claim: islands that Japan calls the Senkaku and China calls the Diaoyu. Coast guard vessels from both countries regularly encounter each other in the waters around them. At their last meeting in November, Hong had criticized Japan for commenting on Chinese activity in the Taiwan Strait and had asked Tokyo to withdraw its ships from the contested seas. The dynamic is one of constant, low-level tension punctuated by moments of higher alarm.

The United States, which has no official position on who owns the islands, has made clear that any Chinese attempt to seize them would be treated as an attack on an American ally. That commitment shapes everything that happens in these waters. It is the reason China views Japan's statements about Taiwan as interference, and the reason Japan cannot remain silent when military exercises occur nearby.

There are small signs of effort to prevent the friction from igniting into something worse. Last month, China and Japan established a military hotline—a direct communication channel meant to help defuse air and sea incidents before they spiral. It is a modest tool, but it reflects an understanding on both sides that the risks are real and that some mechanism for talking down a crisis is necessary. The Monday meeting, happening as the wargames continued, was another such effort: diplomacy proceeding in parallel with military posturing, each side trying to signal both resolve and a willingness to manage the competition without letting it become conflict.

The importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait is not only important for the security of Japan, but also for the stability of the international community as a whole.
— Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno
Hong Liang said he was seeking cooperation in the maritime area with Japan and expected an in-depth conversation with his counterparts.
— Hong Liang, Chinese delegation chief
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su Reuters ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti